On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 19:00 -0500, Alex wrote:
DELIVER=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver
:0 fhW
| $DELIVER -m xspamtest
Do you really want the pipe to be a (f)ilter? What do you expect deliver
to pass back? And you're feeding deliver the mail (h)eaders only,
dropping the body.
--
char
Hi,
deliver should have logged something, or alternatively the problem was
exactly that it couldn't log anything. http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA#logging
Yes, looks like permissions. I have the following now in syslog:
Nov 15 19:51:07 mail02 dovecot: lda(alexuser): Fatal:
On 17.11.2011, at 2.29, Alex wrote:
Nov 15 19:51:07 mail02 dovecot: lda(alexuser): Fatal:
setresgid(12(mail),12(mail),12(mail)) failed with euid=500(alexuser):
Operation not permitted
Where is it trying to write that it can't?
It's trying to change the process's UID/GID to mail/mail for
Hi,
Nov 15 19:51:07 mail02 dovecot: lda(alexuser): Fatal:
setresgid(12(mail),12(mail),12(mail)) failed with euid=500(alexuser):
Operation not permitted
Where is it trying to write that it can't?
It's trying to change the process's UID/GID to mail/mail for some
reason. Have you set
Hi,
DELIVER=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver
:0 fhW
| $DELIVER -m xspamtest
Do you really want the pipe to be a (f)ilter? What do you expect deliver
to pass back? And you're feeding deliver the mail (h)eaders only,
dropping the body.
Yes, thanks. I pasted from another filter we were using,
Hi,
My apologies if a previous message appeared twice. Not sure how that
happened...
Okay, that fixed it. It's now delivering mail properly, thanks.
Just to be clear I understand, if I use the following .procmailrc, it
should save all messages with the X-Spam-Status header in xspamstatus,
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 20:42 -0500, Alex wrote:
[...]
Unrelated to other dovecot specific questions...
Is there an index file that dovecot-lda updates for imap?
Yes. Which would be the advantage of using dovecot deliver, directly or
called from procmail.
Can I just eliminate it entirely and
Unrelated to other dovecot specific questions...
Is there an index file that dovecot-lda updates for imap?
Yes. Which would be the advantage of using dovecot deliver, directly or
called from procmail.
Can I just eliminate it entirely and just have procmail do all the
delivery?
Yes, you
Hi,
I have a number of procmail scripts and I've converted them to sieve,
but they didn't convert very well. Can someone show me how to convert
the following:
:0
{
:0 fhW
| /home/alex/bin/process-mail.pl
}
The script skipped right over that.
The Sieve language doesn't support
Op 15-11-2011 16:38, Alex schreef:
Hi,
The Sieve language doesn't support invoking external programs. You can
execute this program before Sieve, for instance by wrapping the LDA
invocation.
Can you describe how I might do this?
You can write a shell script that is executed from your MTA
Hi,
The Sieve language doesn't support invoking external programs. You can
execute this program before Sieve, for instance by wrapping the LDA
invocation.
Can you describe how I might do this?
You can write a shell script that is executed from your MTA instead of the
Dovecot LDA. Perform
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 13:09 -0500, Alex wrote:
Yes, you can pipe the message to the Dovecot LDA from procmail. This would
be similar to the solution described above, only using Procmail instead of a
shell script.
Are you referring to doing something like this:
Hi,
I just don't understand how to invoke procmail from deliver.
The idea was to invoke deliver from procmail. I still do this myself
since I haven't bothered changing my procmail scripts to Sieve:
DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
:0
* ^List-Id.*dovecot.dovecot.org
| $DELIVER
On 16.11.2011, at 0.14, Alex wrote:
I just don't understand how to invoke procmail from deliver.
The idea was to invoke deliver from procmail. I still do this myself
since I haven't bothered changing my procmail scripts to Sieve:
DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
:0
*
Hi,
I just don't understand how to invoke procmail from deliver.
The idea was to invoke deliver from procmail. I still do this myself
since I haven't bothered changing my procmail scripts to Sieve:
DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
:0
* ^List-Id.*dovecot.dovecot.org
| $DELIVER
On 16.11.2011, at 2.00, Alex wrote:
It's now delivering, but my deliver command must be wrong. This is my
~/.procmailrc:
..
# # /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -m spamtest
lda(root): Fatal: destination user parameter (-d user) not given
Am I doing something wrong?
Is it trying to deliver
Hi,
It's now delivering, but my deliver command must be wrong. This is my
~/.procmailrc:
..
# # /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -m spamtest
lda(root): Fatal: destination user parameter (-d user) not given
Am I doing something wrong?
Is it trying to deliver mails to root user? That's not
On 16.11.2011, at 2.08, Alex wrote:
No, I was just running as root from the command-line for an example.
The maillog shows error 75:
procmail: Assigning DELIVER=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver
procmail: Executing /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver,-m,xspamtest
procmail: Non-zero exitcode (75) from
Hi,
procmail: Assigning DELIVER=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver
procmail: Executing /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver,-m,xspamtest
procmail: Non-zero exitcode (75) from /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver
procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data succeeded
procmail: Executing /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver
Hi,
I have a fedora15 system with dovecot-v2.0.15, dovecot-pigeonhole and
and amavisd-new and would like to implement it on my system using
postfix. I've read the basic wiki documentation, but I really can't
figure out the proper starting point in my case. I've enabled
protocol lda in 15-lda.conf
On 11/15/2011 3:30 AM, Alex wrote:
I have a number of procmail scripts and I've converted them to sieve,
but they didn't convert very well. Can someone show me how to convert
the following:
:0
{
:0 fhW
| /home/alex/bin/process-mail.pl
}
The script skipped right over that.
The Sieve
21 matches
Mail list logo
