Re: [Dovecot] NONEXISTENT status code

2009-11-23 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 17:58 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > NONEXISTENT > > > > The operation attempts to delete something that does not exist. > > > > NONEXISTENT should be used for RENAME or DELETE (also the UID EXPUNGE) > > commands. > > Well, that sucks.. I'll ask Arnt if he had an

Re: [Dovecot] NONEXISTENT status code

2009-11-20 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:43 -0700, Michael M. Slusarz wrote: > From RFC 5530[3]: > > NONEXISTENT > > The operation attempts to delete something that does not exist. > > NONEXISTENT should be used for RENAME or DELETE (also the UID EXPUNGE) > commands. Well, that sucks.. I'll ask Arnt

[Dovecot] NONEXISTENT status code

2009-11-20 Thread Michael M. Slusarz
I'm going to take exception to the way dovecot (1.2.8) is returning the NONEXISTENT response code in certain cases. For example, these transactions: c: 1 EXAMINE "foo" S: 1 NO [NONEXISTENT] Mailbox doesn't exist: foo C: 2 STATUS "foo" (MESSAGES) S: 2 NO [NONEXISTENT] Mailbox doesn't exist: