On 10/5/2008, Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Is it still configurable, and the change you referenced above is the new
>> default?
> Yes.
Nice... :)
>> Also, instead of 'user', how about $user (local part of users email
>> address)?
> Too much trouble. :) And I'm not sure if it he
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 11:28 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 10/5/2008, Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I changed it now to:
> >
> > "Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full)"
> >
> > Although I'm wondering if that should have been "for the user"..
> >
> > Also to my surprise I no
On 10/5/2008, Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I changed it now to:
>
> "Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full)"
>
> Although I'm wondering if that should have been "for the user"..
>
> Also to my surprise I noticed that the text has been configurable in all
> v1.1 versions. You cou
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 09:46 -0400, Ron Wilhoite wrote:
> "Mailbox for $user is full - quota exceeded" or
>
> "Mail storage for $user is full - quota exceeded"
I changed it now to:
"Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full)"
Although I'm wondering if that should have been "for the user"..
Also
On 9/26/2008 12:19 PM, ML wrote:
>> "Mailbox for $user is full - quota exceeded" or
>>
>> "Mail storage for $user is full - quota exceeded"
> $user is not desirable for us, we may have forward/redirect/rewrite from
> an addresse to another and it is not desirable to show the actual name up
Make i
Le 26 sept. 08 à 15:46, Ron Wilhoite a écrit :
"Mailbox for $user is full - quota exceeded" or
"Mail storage for $user is full - quota exceeded"
$user is not desirable for us, we may have forward/redirect/rewrite
from an addresse to another and it is not desirable to show the actual
na
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Ron Wilhoite wrote:
"Mailbox for $user is full - quota exceeded" or
"Mail storage for $user is full - quota exceeded"
I like this one, too. The "quota exceeded" should remain there for the
techies (and support:).
It transl
On 09/26/2008 09:11 AM Timo Sirainen wrote:
I just realized that "quota" word probably doesn't mean much to many
non-native english speakers. Do even non-technical native speakers
understand what "Quota exceeded" really means?
Many do not understand, based on the support calls I receive askin
On 9/26/2008, Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> "Quota exceeded - not enough disk storage capasity for the user"
I like this one best, but 'capasity' should be 'capacity'.
--
Best regards,
Charles
I just realized that "quota" word probably doesn't mean much to many
non-native english speakers. Do even non-technical native speakers
understand what "Quota exceeded" really means?
It's sent by quota plugin, currently in two different situations:
1) To the user doing the operation via IMAP
ts> The first line is also configurable in v1.1. "Quota exceeded" text
ts> itself isn't though.
That's good since not every site wants to tell random outsiders that a
user's quota is full. I know it's common practice, but it's really a
holdover from the early days of email where there wasn't much
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 14:19 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Any plans on having custom Quota Exceeded messages in the future (or now)?
> I'd love to be able to put the exceeding username in the message to help
> with some issues.
v1.0.4 and later use a different message:
Your message to <[EMAIL
Any plans on having custom Quota Exceeded messages in the future (or now)?
I'd love to be able to put the exceeding username in the message to help
with some issues.
Thanks,
Cassidy
13 matches
Mail list logo
