on 5-30-2009 2:25 PM Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk spake the following:
On 30. mai. 2009, at 00.03, Scott Silva wrote:
# e2fsck -D -f /dev/hdXY
Note: This should work with both ext2 and ext3 filesystems. Depending
on the
size of your filesystem, this could take a long time. Perhaps you
should go
On 30. mai. 2009, at 00.03, Scott Silva wrote:
# e2fsck -D -f /dev/hdXY
Note: This should work with both ext2 and ext3 filesystems.
Depending on the
size of your filesystem, this could take a long time. Perhaps you
should go
get some coffee...
AFAIK an updatedb (as in locate/slocate),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:25:58PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
On 30. mai. 2009, at 00.03, Scott Silva wrote:
[...]
AFAIK an updatedb (as in locate/slocate) [...]
This won't help with the original poster's problem (which is in helping
the
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 21:28 -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, May 29 at 09:46 AM, quoth Curtis Maloney:
This is certainly one advantage dbox and maildir have -- not being
limited to the FS file size limit per folder.
That's not *entirely* accurate. Certainly no single message can
Hi Scott,
Are you saying that you can gzip a mailbox, and Dovecot will then
somehow uncompress that and send the data back out to the Desktop
Client as a normal looking IMAP box?
I have never heard of this tactic, and I am not finding any references
to it on google, though I am
On Qui, 28 Mai 2009, Curtis Maloney wrote:
But what sort of user puts 4GB of mail into a _single_ folder??
Those that never delete the emails nor move them into folders.
Everything they ever received is in the INBOX.
And yes, this happens a lot.
--
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
on 5-28-2009 4:46 PM Curtis Maloney spake the following:
robforrest wrote:
What is happening is that as users log in (via thunderbird), they are
shown
the contents of their mailboxes. However, when they try and access a
given
email, they get no response even if they wait upwards of 10
on 5-29-2009 1:42 AM Bernd Petrovitsch spake the following:
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 21:28 -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, May 29 at 09:46 AM, quoth Curtis Maloney:
This is certainly one advantage dbox and maildir have -- not being
limited to the FS file size limit per folder.
That's not
Hi all,
I'm new here and would very much appreciate any help you can give me.
We are running a rather outdated mail server that until recently has been
running beautifully. Under the pretense of it is ain't broke, don't fix
it it hasn't been updated so is running Fedora Core 4 and dovecot
On Thu, 28 May 2009 02:07:01 -0700 (PDT) robforrest wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new here and would very much appreciate any help you can give me.
We are running a rather outdated mail server that until recently has been
running beautifully. Under the pretense of it is ain't broke, don't fix
it
on 5-28-2009 2:07 AM robforrest spake the following:
Hi all,
I'm new here and would very much appreciate any help you can give me.
We are running a rather outdated mail server that until recently has been
running beautifully. Under the pretense of it is ain't broke, don't fix
it it
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 02:07 -0700, robforrest wrote:
What is happening is that as users log in (via thunderbird), they are shown
the contents of their mailboxes. However, when they try and access a given
email, they get no response even if they wait upwards of 10 minutes. I
believe that the
on 5-28-2009 9:36 AM Timo Sirainen spake the following:
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 02:07 -0700, robforrest wrote:
What is happening is that as users log in (via thunderbird), they are shown
the contents of their mailboxes. However, when they try and access a given
email, they get no response even
On May 28, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-28-2009 9:36 AM Timo Sirainen spake the following:
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 02:07 -0700, robforrest wrote:
What is happening is that as users log in (via thunderbird), they
are shown
the contents of their mailboxes. However, when they try
on 5-28-2009 12:24 PM Scott Haneda spake the following:
On May 28, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-28-2009 9:36 AM Timo Sirainen spake the following:
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 02:07 -0700, robforrest wrote:
What is happening is that as users log in (via thunderbird), they
are shown
On May 28, 2009, at 1:12 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
Can you state what the size of your several large mboxes is? I
have
been curious about this. My current email server forces me to
manage my
IMAP boxes not based on size, though I believe there is a less than
2GB
limit, but on message count.
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 13:35 -0700, Scott Haneda wrote:
My largest is about 5+ GB gzipped (I thought it was 6gb until I just
checked),
but I am on a 64 bit server and don't have a 2 gb filesize limit. I
have
several users with 2 to 3 GB inboxes on IMAP, and don't get any
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 13:35 -0700, Scott Haneda wrote:
My largest is about 5+ GB gzipped (I thought it was 6gb until I just
checked),
but I am on a 64 bit server and don't have a 2 gb filesize limit. I
have
several
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 16:00 -0500, Matt wrote:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib
What advantage is compression rather then disk space on server?
For mbox, there's no other advantage than less disk space usage. Instead
there are disadvantages, because the mbox is then read-only.
For
snip
I used to keep an eye on these clients, and set a never leave mail on
server setting on my old server. Not sure how to do this in Dovecot,
though if I have my way, everyone is going to be on IMAP, though they
are free to use it like POP if they want.
Thanks again for your reply,
robforrest wrote:
What is happening is that as users log in (via thunderbird), they are shown
the contents of their mailboxes. However, when they try and access a given
email, they get no response even if they wait upwards of 10 minutes. I
believe that the problem has arisen from their huge
At 07:46 PM 5/28/2009, Curtis Maloney wrote:
FC4 is quite old... can the kernel and filesystem you're using
properly handle files over 4GB?
This is certainly one advantage dbox and maildir have -- not being
limited to the FS file size limit per folder.
But what sort of user puts 4GB of mail
On Friday, May 29 at 09:46 AM, quoth Curtis Maloney:
This is certainly one advantage dbox and maildir have -- not being
limited to the FS file size limit per folder.
That's not *entirely* accurate. Certainly no single message can exceed
the 2GB limit even with maildir, and the other issue
On May 28, 2009, at 10:28 PM, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, May 29 at 09:46 AM, quoth Curtis Maloney:
This is certainly one advantage dbox and maildir have -- not being
limited to the FS file size limit per folder.
That's not *entirely* accurate. Certainly no single message can
exceed
24 matches
Mail list logo
