El Jueves, 30 de Octubre de 2008 a las 20:15, Timo Sirainen escribió:
> On Oct 30, 2008, at 9:02 PM, John Lightsey wrote:
> > A little late, but I don't see any mention of /etc/lsb-release in
> > the LSB specification. You probably want the output of /usr/bin/
> > lsb_release -d
>
> I don't think
On Oct 30, 2008, at 9:02 PM, John Lightsey wrote:
A little late, but I don't see any mention of /etc/lsb-release in
the LSB specification. You probably want the output of /usr/bin/
lsb_release -d
I don't think dovecot should execute external binaries. Sounds scary.
PGP.sig
Description: T
On Oct 29, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
First however it checks for /etc/lsb-release and if it exists, prints
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION contents. I guess Ubuntu is the only distro
currently using that file..
A little late, but I don't see any mention of /etc/lsb-release in the
LSB spe
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 10/29/2008 2:41 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
/etc/gentoo-release
Added.
Hmmm... this doesn't really contain useful info though...
~ # cat /etc/gentoo release
Gentoo Base System release 1.12.11.1
Looks just fine.
maybe some forme of the uname command?
~ # uname -orpm
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 16:02 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 10/29/2008 1:39 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Any other suggestions that I could add before 1.1.6 release, which I'm
> > really trying to release today? :)
>
> Add the contents of non-default dovecot-sql.conf, dovecot-ldap.conf and
> may
On 10/29/2008 1:39 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Any other suggestions that I could add before 1.1.6 release, which I'm
> really trying to release today? :)
Add the contents of non-default dovecot-sql.conf, dovecot-ldap.conf and
maybe dovecot-db.conf to the output?
;)
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 10/29/2008 2:41 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> /etc/gentoo-release
>
> Added.
>
>> Hmmm... this doesn't really contain useful info though...
>>
>> ~ # cat /etc/gentoo release
>> Gentoo Base System release 1.12.11.1
>
> Looks just fine.
>
>> maybe some forme of the uname command?
>>
>> ~ # uname
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 14:37 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 10/29/2008, Andra~ 'ruskie' Levstik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Two more to add:
> > /etc/sourcemage-release
> > /etc/slackware-version
>
> One more:
>
> /etc/gentoo-release
Added.
> Hmmm... this doesn't really contain useful inf
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The filesystem is looked up by getting the mount information for the
> directory in mail_location. That's not correct in all setups, but
> probably correct for most.
I was wondering why this felt like it was too easy. dovecot -n can't
easil
On 10/29/2008, Andra~ 'ruskie' Levstik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Two more to add:
> /etc/sourcemage-release
> /etc/slackware-version
One more:
/etc/gentoo-release
Hmmm... this doesn't really contain useful info though...
~ # cat /etc/gentoo release
Gentoo Base System release 1.12.11.1
mayb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:18 +0100, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
/etc/sourcemage-release
Does this contain Sourcemage name in some way?
cat /etc/sourcemage-release
Source Mage GNU/Linux 0.9.6.1 i486-
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:18 +0100, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> /etc/sourcemage-release
Does this contain Sourcemage name in some way?
> /etc/slackware-version
Does this contain Slackware name in some way?
(Most seem to, but Debian is an exception and contains only "lenny/sid"
with me, so I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Two more to add:
/etc/sourcemage-release
/etc/slackware-version
:)
- --
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker
Be sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodies.
Ryle hira
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 06:51 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 10/26/2008, Bill Cole ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > As the Dovecot website says in reference to this mailing list, you
> > should specify your Dovecot version, your OS and version (and with
> > Linux, the specific distribution,) your CP
On 10/27/2008 12:29 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
>> Maybe 'dovecot -n' could also provide basic system info (it already does
>> for the dovecot version)? I know the command varies depending on said
>> architecture, but for most systems it could probably easily figure this out?
>>
>> Just a thought...
>
But then Dovecot wouldn't be able to take evasive action when the
ancient computers of Magrathea fire missiles at us :)
Scott Silva wrote:
on 10-27-2008 3:51 AM Charles Marcus spake the following:
On 10/26/2008, Bill Cole ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
As the Dovecot website says in refer
on 10-27-2008 3:51 AM Charles Marcus spake the following:
> On 10/26/2008, Bill Cole ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> As the Dovecot website says in reference to this mailing list, you
>> should specify your Dovecot version, your OS and version (and with
>> Linux, the specific distribution,) your CPU
On 10/26/2008, Bill Cole ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> As the Dovecot website says in reference to this mailing list, you
> should specify your Dovecot version, your OS and version (and with
> Linux, the specific distribution,) your CPU architecture (not
> everyone uses x86,) the type of filesystem
18 matches
Mail list logo
