On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> On 2010-10-18 9:47 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
>
>> V2 of dovecot has had the following releases (to recap)
>>
>> 2.0.0 2010-08-16
>> 2.0.1 2010-08-24
>> 2.0.2 2010-09-08
>> 2.0.3 2010-09-17
>> 2.0.4 2010-09-26
>> 2.0.5 2010-10-01
>>
> 2.0.6 201
On 2010-10-18 9:47 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
V2 of dovecot has had the following releases (to recap)
2.0.0 2010-08-16
2.0.1 2010-08-24
2.0.2 2010-09-08
2.0.3 2010-09-17
2.0.4 2010-09-26
2.0.5 2010-10-01
2.0.6 2010-10-25
2.0.7 2010-11-12
FreeBSD added dovecot2 to the ports recently (finally)
Than
On Monday, October 18 at 04:12 PM, quoth Jim Pazarena:
some over whelming need to update, and I would really like to know
what this is
Mail folders containing both messages and sub-folders is what I/my
clients desire.
I used Maildir++ layout with mboxes on dovecot 1.2.x. It wasn't
documente
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> V2 of dovecot has had the following releases (to recap)
>
> 2.0.0 2010-08-16
> 2.0.1 2010-08-24
> 2.0.2 2010-09-08
> 2.0.3 2010-09-17
> 2.0.4 2010-09-26
> 2.0.5 2010-10-01
>
> I am on FreeBSD, and the port committers want to wait till
>
I am on FreeBSD 8.1/amd64 and running Dovecot 2.0.5 on 8+ boxes. I
just tweaked my port source to install the 2.0.x version instead of
1.2.x. It's been very stable for us without any issues.
-c
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> V2 of dovecot has had the following releases
On 10/18/2010 2:12 PM, Jerry wrote:
Five updates in something like 63 days is certainly not encouraging. I
am sure that Timo is doing the best he can; however, unless you had
some over whelming need to update, and I would really like to know what
this is, I would recommend waiting. By the way, I
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:47:42 -0700
Jim Pazarena articulated:
> V2 of dovecot has had the following releases (to recap)
>
> 2.0.0 2010-08-16
> 2.0.1 2010-08-24
> 2.0.2 2010-09-08
> 2.0.3 2010-09-17
> 2.0.4 2010-09-26
> 2.0.5 2010-10-01
>
> I am on FreeBSD, and the port committers want to w
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 11:08 -0700, Brad Davidson wrote:
> Timo - I noticed in the TODO you've got:
> doveadm director assign
>
> That would sure be nice to have for testing - add a test host with
> weight 0 and assign guinea pig users to it on the fly!
Hmm. Actually now that I think of it, thi
> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 13:46 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> > I am running 2.0.5 (svn repository) in production for about a
>> > thousand users without major issues.
>>
>> Please Sir, on what OS and architecture ?
>
> I think the stability has less to do with that, and more to do with what
> p
We're using 2.0.5 Director in front of a 1.2.15 POP/IMAP cluster for 60k
accounts. I figure we might look at upgrading the backend to 2.0.x
sometime in December after some additional shake-down and testing.
Timo - I noticed in the TODO you've got:
doveadm director assign
That would sure be nice
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 13:46 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > I am running 2.0.5 (svn repository) in production for about a
> > thousand users without major issues.
>
> Please Sir, on what OS and architecture ?
I think the stability has less to do with that, and more to do with what
parts of Dove
>
>
> I am running 2.0.5 (svn repository) in production for about a
> thousand users without major issues.
Please Sir, on what OS and architecture ?
--
Dennis
I am running 2.0.5 (svn repository) in production for about a
thousand users without major issues.
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:47:42
-0700, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> V2 of dovecot has had the following
releases (to recap)
>
> 2.0.0 2010-08-16
> 2.0.1 2010-08-24
> 2.0.2
2010-09-08
> 2.0.3 2010-09-17
> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 09:47 -0700, Jim Pazarena wrote:
>
>> So, my question is, respectfully, is dovecot V2.0.5 stable enough
>> for prime-time on a busy ISP mail server? I'll install it myself
>> independent of the FreeBSD ports tree if so.
>
> It's getting better :) I'll make 2.0.6 release thi
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 09:47 -0700, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> So, my question is, respectfully, is dovecot V2.0.5 stable enough
> for prime-time on a busy ISP mail server? I'll install it myself
> independent of the FreeBSD ports tree if so.
It's getting better :) I'll make 2.0.6 release this week ag
V2 of dovecot has had the following releases (to recap)
2.0.0 2010-08-16
2.0.1 2010-08-24
2.0.2 2010-09-08
2.0.3 2010-09-17
2.0.4 2010-09-26
2.0.5 2010-10-01
I am on FreeBSD, and the port committers want to wait till
dovecot V2 "stabilizes" prior to adding it to the FreeBSD
ports base.
So
16 matches
Mail list logo
