On 25.8.2012, at 19.09, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> Not enable mail_log for doveadm:
>>
>> protocol !doveadm {
>> mail_plugins = $mail_plugins = mail_log
>> }
>
> JFTR: That didn't work.
This would omit it from the local dsync.
>> or alternatively override it only for the dsync command with dovead
On 23.08.2012, at 22:01, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 19.8.2012, at 12.51, Michael Grimm wrote:
1) I see a lot of error messages whenever replicator is in action like
(although everything is being synced correctly):
| mail dovecot: dsync-local(test): Error: remote:
dsync
On 19.8.2012, at 12.51, Michael Grimm wrote:
>>> 1) I see a lot of error messages whenever replicator is in action like
>>> (although everything is being synced correctly):
>>>
>>> | mail dovecot: dsync-local(test): Error: remote:
>>> dsync-remote(test): Info: save: box=INBOX, uid=27,
>>> m
On 08.03.2012, at 12:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 11:26 +0100, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> Now some observations regarding replicator:
>>
>> 1) I see a lot of error messages whenever replicator is in action like
>> (although everything is being synced correctly):
>>
>>| mai
Hi --
On 08.03.2012 12:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 11:26 +0100, Michael Grimm wrote:
You can do for example:
service config {
unix_listener config {
user = vmail
}
}
I will try that later.
It seems to me, that whenever a larger number of mails arrive on
both
s
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 11:26 +0100, Michael Grimm wrote:
> Let me start with replicator's configuration ...
>
> > Below is a configuration for virtual user setup.
> [...]
> > service doveadm {
> > # if you're using a single virtual user, set this to
> > # start ssh as vmail (not root)
> > use
Hi --
On 04.03.2012 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication.
Everything isn't finished yet, but it appears to work and I've
enabled
it for my @dovecot.fi mails.
I did give it a try starting some days ago, and I can confirm that you
are right,
On 5.3.2012, at 14.35, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:45:26PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>>
>>> So, ideally (for us), dovecot should keep a log over which accounts are
>>> active (has received or checked mail), and only sync users that has been
>>> active for the last $
On 5.3.2012, at 15.11, Attila Nagy wrote:
>> dsync doesn't currently take enough advantage of modseqs and send only the
>> changed data.
> Hm. What is your estimate about the performance capability of the current
> "best" replication scheme available in Dovecot?
> I know it's hard to tell, becau
On 03/05/12 13:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.3.2012, at 14.15, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 03/04/12 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything isn't
finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my @dovecot.fi
mails. Some issue
On 5.3.2012, at 14.15, Attila Nagy wrote:
>>> On 03/04/12 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything
isn't finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my
@dovecot.fi mails. Some issues:
>>> Do you plan
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:45:26PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > So, ideally (for us), dovecot should keep a log over which accounts are
> > active (has received or checked mail), and only sync users that has been
> > active for the last $timeperiode on startup.
>
> Well, all of this could
On 03/05/12 11:08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.3.2012, at 9.25, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 03/04/12 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything isn't
finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my @dovecot.fi
mails. Some issues
On 5.3.2012, at 10.35, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
>> 1) Replicator syncs all users at startup. If you can change your userdb
>> iteration to return only one test user for replicator that avoids it. (You
>> may be able to do protocol replicator { userdb {..} } and protocol
>> !replicator { .. })
On 5.3.2012, at 9.25, Attila Nagy wrote:
> On 03/04/12 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything isn't
>> finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my @dovecot.fi
>> mails. Some issues:
>>
> Do you plan to make it mo
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:38:14PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > Great news. I would love to test it, if I will be able to run this on a
> > test
> > account, only. All other users should become synced the "old way" for the
> > time
> > being.
> >
> > Would that be possible with the cu
Hi,
On 03/04/12 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything
isn't finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my
@dovecot.fi mails. Some issues:
- public namespace isn't replicated at all
- shared namespace is replicate
On 4.3.2012, at 23.39, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> Anyway, replicator simply runs doveadm, so there's not much that can go
>> wrong. So
>> you could even ignore 1) and just let it sync everyone at startup.
>
> Does that mean that the new functionality (queue) does only run dsync
> replication
> the
Hi --
On 04.03.2012, at 12:38, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 4.3.2012, at 13.34, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> On 04.03.2012, at 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication.
>>
>> Great news. I would love to test it, if I will be able to run this on a test
>
On 4.3.2012, at 13.34, Michael Grimm wrote:
> On 04.03.2012, at 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication.
>
> Great news. I would love to test it, if I will be able to run this on a test
> account, only. All other users should become synced the
Hi --
On 04.03.2012, at 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication.
Great news. I would love to test it, if I will be able to run this on a test
account, only. All other users should become synced the "old way" for the time
being.
Would that be p
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything
isn't finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my
@dovecot.fi mails. Some issues:
- public namespace isn't replicated at all
- shared namespace is replicated, but not private mail flags
- I've only tes
22 matches
Mail list logo
