On Tuesday, January 4 at 10:08 AM, quoth Kyle Wheeler:
I just upgraded to v2.0.8 and was able to reproduce the problem. :(
I don't see anything in the hg changelog summaries since 2.0.8 was
released that suggest something related to this... hrm.
If it helps understand the problem, here's a s
On Tuesday, January 4 at 12:14 PM, quoth Timo Sirainen:
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 08:33 -0700, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
I'm using Dovecot 2.0.6. Here's the output of dovecot -n:
..
2 LIST "" "INBOX"
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "INBOX"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "INBOX"
2 OK List completed.
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 08:33 -0700, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> I'm using Dovecot 2.0.6. Here's the output of dovecot -n:
..
> 2 LIST "" "INBOX"
> * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "INBOX"
> * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "INBOX"
> 2 OK List completed.
I remember fixing something related to this. Also I co
On Thursday, December 30 at 12:33 PM, quoth Timo Sirainen:
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 14:40 -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
I am trying to use two namespaces to create an "archival" directory
that is stored as mboxes (the rest of my tree is all stored as
maildirs). However, when I add the second namespac
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 14:40 -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> I am trying to use two namespaces to create an "archival" directory
> that is stored as mboxes (the rest of my tree is all stored as
> maildirs). However, when I add the second namespace, suddenly Dovecot
> starts emitting, in response to
Hello,
I am trying to use two namespaces to create an "archival" directory
that is stored as mboxes (the rest of my tree is all stored as
maildirs). However, when I add the second namespace, suddenly Dovecot
starts emitting, in response to the LIST command, a second version of
the INBOX that
On 07/19/2010 07:09 PM jorge martinez wrote:
> Hello, i have an issue with vpopmail, this created a sub folder named "0"
> and all the new users created inside this folder into the domain folder.
>
> Weel i don understand why vpopmail do that, but i want to know if the option
> in dovecot.conf nam
Hello, i have an issue with vpopmail, this created a sub folder named "0"
and all the new users created inside this folder into the domain folder.
Weel i don understand why vpopmail do that, but i want to know if the option
in dovecot.conf namespaces i can make it to search the Maildir in both
dir
On 19.2.2010, at 18.44, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
> I was following the earlier namespaces discussion and I would like to
> repost a doubt. I need to have some kind of archiving, it means, store old
> messages into a cheap storage. But I couldn´t think any other solution
> than symlinks.
Symli
Hi,
I did some researches and I could reproduce item: 1 - storage inbox in
quick disks and other folders in cheaper ones.
Something like this:
namespace private {
separator = .
prefix =
location = maildir:/tmp/%u/Maildir
inbox = yes
hidden = yes
list = no # for v1.1+
}
namespace p
Hi,
I was following the earlier namespaces discussion and I would like to
repost a doubt. I need to have some kind of archiving, it means, store old
messages into a cheap storage. But I couldn´t think any other solution
than symlinks.
Then, I thought about store 'Sent Items' (as having old messa
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 10:13 +0200, Jernej Porenta wrote:
> With upper settings, dovecot crashes upon login. (GDB trace is here:
> http://www2.arnes.si/~krklubsls13/dovecot-gdb.txt).
>
> If I change "list = no" to list = yes|children, everything is working fine.
Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.o
Hey everyone,
I am trying to migrate old UW-IMAP setup to dovecot 1.2.2 using
namespaces as recommended for UW-IMAP backwards compatibility:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces
I am trying to use these settings:
mail_location = mbox:~/:INBOX=~/.mailbox
# default namespace
namespace private {
Found the clue I was looking for at
http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg08557.html. Seems
to be working fine now.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Namespaces-and-shared-folders-tp20727713p20737738.html
Sent from the Dovecot mailing list archive at Nab
On Nov 28, 2008, at 6:44 PM, bbell2000 wrote:
Great suggestion. I've changed my namespaces as follows:
Rather do it the other way around:
namespace private {
separator =
prefix = INBOX.
prefix =
location = maildir:~/Maildir
inbox = yes
}
namespace public {
separator = /
prefi
giuliano wrote:
>
>
> I prefer to define everything, even the values that have a default, so
> I would define
> location (even if mail_location should apply to the default namespace)
> and the separator.
>
Great suggestion. I've changed my namespaces as follows:
namespace private {
On F 28 Nov, 2008, at 02:16 , bbell2000 wrote:
I had a working dovecot install before I tried to implement shared
folders
using namespaces.
I added the following to /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:
namespace private {
separator =
prefix =
inbox = yes
}
I prefer to define every
I had a working dovecot install before I tried to implement shared folders
using namespaces.
I added the following to /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:
namespace private {
separator =
prefix =
inbox = yes
}
namespace public {
separator = /
prefix =
location = maildi
John Doe wrote:
The SEPARATOR should just refer to the storage structure and the PREFIX
should refer to the hierarchy. So if you use "/" as your SEPARATOR, then
your storage structure will be user-directory/folder/sub-folder and if
you use "." as your storage structure (the default), then you
> The SEPARATOR should just refer to the storage structure and the PREFIX
> should refer to the hierarchy. So if you use "/" as your SEPARATOR, then
> your storage structure will be user-directory/folder/sub-folder and if
> you use "." as your storage structure (the default), then your storage
John Doe wrote:
Hi,
I am new to dovecot and I am a bit confused with how
namespaces/prefixes/separators are handled by the clients and dovecot...
I tried to understand the desciption from the conf file but without success.
With each conf I create the following path /f1/f2 on the client (thund
Hi,
I am new to dovecot and I am a bit confused with how
namespaces/prefixes/separators are handled by the clients and dovecot...
I tried to understand the desciption from the conf file but without success.
With each conf I create the following path /f1/f2 on the client (thunderbird)
and get th
On Aug 1, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Evaggelos Balaskas wrote:
Am i asking this because i've already read this page:
Unless you're using a single UID for all the users, you'll need to
have
a dovecot-shared file in each shared maildir
Yes, but dovecot-shared also controls whether seen flags are priv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am i asking this because i've already read this page:
Unless you're using a single UID for all the users, you'll need to have
a dovecot-shared file in each shared maildir
so in my previous email i wrote : (same uid.gid)
and that in the public locati
On 8/1/2008 7:06 AM, Evaggelos Balaskas wrote:
but ... when one user reads an email from the public folder
then the status (flag read) changes to all users.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes
Scroll down to 'Flag Sharing' and you find:
"Flag sharing
With Maildir dovecot-shared file cont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
i need to create a public maildir folder for virtual users so i did this:
dovecot-1.0.15:
namespace public {
prefix = public/
separator = /
location =
maildir:/var/mail/shared:INDEX=/var/mail/shared/%u/index/:CONTROL=/var/
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Jason Frisvold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I'm thinking renaming the folders may be the way to go... It's
> easy on the test machine, not many folders.. The live system is a tad
> larger.. :P But, I think I have a working script already.. We shall
> see.
On 7/22/08, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I converted from Binc to Dovecot a while back, and I didn't use namespaces
> at all. Since I had been using the IMAPdir schema in Binc, I had to rename
> all the folders to match the Maildir++ schema, but that was a pretty simple
> script to wr
On Tuesday, July 22 at 10:33 AM, quoth Jason Frisvold:
I'm working to convert from a bincIMAP setup to a Dovecot setup.
I've tried messing around with namespaces to make the conversion
transparent, but I'm getting nowhere. Are namespaces necessary? Or
can I proceed by recursively renaming th
Hi all,
I'm working to convert from a bincIMAP setup to a Dovecot setup. I've
tried messing around with namespaces to make the conversion
transparent, but I'm getting nowhere. Are namespaces necessary? Or
can I proceed by recursively renaming the folders on the server? A
transparent solution w
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 09:21:19PM +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
On 12/02/2007 08:59 PM, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 23:59 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
>>> I'd like to provide shared mailboxes with maildi
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
On 12/02/2007 09:35 PM, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
On 02.12.2007 23:21, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
[...]
I'd like to be able to deliver e.g. new mail to the technical support
directly to "Shared/
On 12/02/2007 09:35 PM, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
>> On 02.12.2007 23:21, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I'd like to be able to deliver e.g. new mail to the technical support
>>> directly to "Shared/tech/" but if that's not possible, it is
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
On 02.12.2007 23:21, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
[...]
I'd like to be able to deliver e.g. new mail to the technical support
directly to "Shared/tech/" but if that's not possible, it isn't a big
problem, I'll just use "Shared/tech/INCOMING".
Che
On 02.12.2007 23:21, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
On 12/02/2007 08:59 PM, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 23:59 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
I'd like to provide shared mailboxes with maildir that should appea
On 12/02/2007 08:59 PM, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 23:59 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
>>> I'd like to provide shared mailboxes with maildir that should appear
>>> like 'Shared/' to the clients.
>>>
>>> Using the namespace
On 12/02/2007 02:45 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 23:59 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
>> I'd like to provide shared mailboxes with maildir that should appear
>> like 'Shared/' to the clients.
>>
>> Using the namespace configuration below, everything works fine, exept
>>
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 23:59 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
I'd like to provide shared mailboxes with maildir that should appear
like 'Shared/' to the clients.
Using the namespace configuration below, everything works fine, exept
one thing: Mail
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 23:59 +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
> I'd like to provide shared mailboxes with maildir that should appear
> like 'Shared/' to the clients.
>
> Using the namespace configuration below, everything works fine, exept
> one thing: Mail clients (only tested with Thunderbi
On 12/02/2007 09:41 AM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> On 02.12.2007 1:59, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
>> I'd like to provide shared mailboxes with maildir that should appear
>> like 'Shared/' to the clients.
>>
>> Using the namespace configuration below, everything works fine, exept
>> one thing: Mai
On 02.12.2007 1:59, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to provide shared mailboxes with maildir that should appear
like 'Shared/' to the clients.
Using the namespace configuration below, everything works fine, exept
one thing: Mail clients (only tested with Thunderbird) won't allow to
Hi!
I'd like to provide shared mailboxes with maildir that should appear
like 'Shared/' to the clients.
Using the namespace configuration below, everything works fine, exept
one thing: Mail clients (only tested with Thunderbird) won't allow to
put mails directly in 'Shared/mailboxname' (the folde
On Aug 14 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 21:58 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Timo and all. imap/cmd-create.c contains the following bit of code:
..
So. Am I missing something, or crazy, or is this really a bug? Thanks,
It's a bug. Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 21:58 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Timo and all. imap/cmd-create.c contains the following bit of code:
..
> So. Am I missing something, or crazy, or is this really a bug? Thanks,
It's a bug. Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/33690bb286af
signature.asc
De
Hi Timo and all. imap/cmd-create.c contains the following bit of code:
len = strlen(full_mailbox);
if (len == 0 || full_mailbox[len-1] != ns->sep)
directory = FALSE;
else {
/* name ends with hierarchy separator - client is just
45 matches
Mail list logo
