Timo Sirainen writes:
> On 1.6.2013, at 13.24, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>
>> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>>
>>> Karol Jurak writes:
>>>
On Thursday 30 of May 2013 10:33:01 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> Does anyone have a recommended way of handling this? Is it possible to
> either "flatten
On 1.6.2013, at 13.24, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>
>> Karol Jurak writes:
>>
>>> On Thursday 30 of May 2013 10:33:01 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
Does anyone have a recommended way of handling this? Is it possible to
either "flatten" the structure further, or someho
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> Karol Jurak writes:
>
>> On Thursday 30 of May 2013 10:33:01 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>>> Does anyone have a recommended way of handling this? Is it possible to
>>> either "flatten" the structure further, or somehow tell dovecot to
>>> recurse into directories? I don't mi
Karol Jurak writes:
> On Thursday 30 of May 2013 10:33:01 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> Does anyone have a recommended way of handling this? Is it possible to
>> either "flatten" the structure further, or somehow tell dovecot to
>> recurse into directories? I don't mind having a separate gnus server
On Thursday 30 of May 2013 10:33:01 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> Does anyone have a recommended way of handling this? Is it possible to
> either "flatten" the structure further, or somehow tell dovecot to
> recurse into directories? I don't mind having a separate gnus server
> for each mail account, bu
Forgive what may be a newby question, but I'm trying to get a new setup
working, and there are many different things confusing me.
I'm trying for a gnus + dovecot + mbsync arrangement, with mbsync
writing to maildirs, and gnus reading from those dirs with a dovecot
invocation. Fairly standard, I t