On 2012-03-05 12:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.3.2012, at 18.12, Charles Marcus wrote:
Thunderbird has an annoying behavior where it sends a new/separate
query each time a character is typed, beginning with the very first
character:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541400
This
On 5.3.2012, at 18.12, Charles Marcus wrote:
> One last question then (couldn't find an answer on the wiki)...
>
> I'm currently planning on using fts/clucene, but I'm thinking I'd like the
> following to apply also to dovecots internal indexes too...
>
> What is the minimal number of character
On 2012-03-05 9:48 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.3.2012, at 13.24, Charles Marcus wrote:
Thunderbird has a 'Quickfilter Toolbar' with a little searchbox
that applies a filter of the current folder message view pane (to
show you only messages in the pane that meet the criteria
specified). The de
On 5.3.2012, at 13.24, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-02-28 9:57 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> So, Solr in Dovecot works perfectly.
>
> Timo, a follow-up on this...
>
> Thunderbird has a 'Quickfilter Toolbar' with a little searchbox that applies
> a filter of the current folder message view pan
On 2012-02-28 9:57 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So, Solr in Dovecot works perfectly.
Timo, a follow-up on this...
Thunderbird has a 'Quickfilter Toolbar' with a little searchbox that
applies a filter of the current folder message view pane (to show you
only messages in the pane that meet the cr
On 2012-03-05 3:43 AM, kada...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 02/03/12 13:40, Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 2012-02-28 11:28 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-02-28 11:05 AM, kfx wrote:
Ok I feel ashame... it was a third party init scrip who was the
problem :(
So... you're saying that Thunderbird now
Stan,
* Stan Hoeppner :
> On 3/4/2012 4:47 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> > On 04.03.2012 23:29, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> not worth discussing seems a bit naive, or arrogant, or both. Given how
> >> long it takes, never in some cases, for Mozilla to fix IMAP related
> >> prob
On 3/4/2012 4:47 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> On 04.03.2012 23:29, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>
>
>> not worth discussing seems a bit naive, or arrogant, or both. Given how
>> long it takes, never in some cases, for Mozilla to fix IMAP related
>> problems in TBird, you can't blame the OP for l
On 04.03.2012 23:29, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> not worth discussing seems a bit naive, or arrogant, or both. Given how
> long it takes, never in some cases, for Mozilla to fix IMAP related
> problems in TBird, you can't blame the OP for looking in other
> directions for a solution. Note the bug
On 3/4/2012 11:39 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> It has been demonstrated that dovecot+fts is working properly and that this
> not a dovecot issue.
Most software contains workarounds to bugs/misfeatures in other vendors'
programs. Dovecot already has many:
NFS:
mmap_disable = no
mail_nf
On 2012-03-04 11:59 AM, Christian Roessner
wrote:
you will see that it uses solr. So from my point of view it would be
a Thunderbird thing.
As I said, I would like confirmation *from the OP* about his last
comment that his problem with Thunderbird was actually fixed by fixing
whatever 'third
On Mar 4, 2012, at 7:57 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-03-03 4:16 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>> On Mar 3, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>> On 2012-03-02 5:13 PM, Robin wrote:
This mailing list is for dovecot, not Thunderbird support. The lack of
replies to Thunderb
>>>
>
>> well as I wrote in the mini-tutorial, if you use roundcube search,
>
> ? First post from you in this thread, much less a reference to some
> mini-tutorial you wrote
This:
http://www.roessner-network-solutions.com/2012/02/19/full-text-search-with-solr-and-dovecot-on-ubuntu-10-04/
is
On 2012-03-04 11:21 AM, Christian Roessner
wrote:
The OP showed where *something* was misbehaving - maybe you should
read an entire thread before jumping in?
The bottom line, though, until it can be determined that it *is* a
Thunderbird bug, we won't know if it is a dovecot bug or not, will
we?
> The OP showed where *something* was misbehaving - maybe you should read an
> entire thread before jumping in?
>
> The bottom line, though, until it can be determined that it *is* a
> Thunderbird bug, we won't know if it is a dovecot bug or not, will we?
well as I wrote in the mini-tutorial,
On 2012-03-03 4:16 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Mar 3, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-02 5:13 PM, Robin wrote:
This mailing list is for dovecot, not Thunderbird support. The lack of
replies to Thunderbird usage questions no doubt reflects this.
What precisely about
On Mar 3, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-03-02 5:13 PM, Robin wrote:
>> This mailing list is for dovecot, not Thunderbird support. The lack of
>> replies to Thunderbird usage questions no doubt reflects this.
>
> What precisely about a possible bug with *any* IMAP client wh
On 2012-03-02 5:13 PM, Robin wrote:
This mailing list is for dovecot, not Thunderbird support. The lack of
replies to Thunderbird usage questions no doubt reflects this.
What precisely about a possible bug with *any* IMAP client when using
dovecot+fts makes you think that this is not on topi
On 03/02/2012 05:13 PM, Robin wrote:
On 3/2/2012 4:40 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Please respond... I need to know whether or not I need to pursue this,
since we use Thunderbird in house and will be switching soon to
dovecot...
This mailing list is for dovecot, not Thunderbird support. The lack
On 3/2/2012 4:40 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Please respond... I need to know whether or not I need to pursue this,
since we use Thunderbird in house and will be switching soon to dovecot...
This mailing list is for dovecot, not Thunderbird support. The lack of
replies to Thunderbird usage ques
On 2012-02-28 11:28 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-02-28 11:05 AM, kfx wrote:
Ok I feel ashame... it was a third party init scrip who was the
problem :(
Sorry for the noise and thank you for dovecot
So... you're saying that Thunderbird now correctly uses server side search?
Please resp
On 2012-02-28 11:05 AM, kfx wrote:
Ok I feel ashame... it was a third party init scrip who was the problem :(
Sorry for the noise and thank you for dovecot
So... you're saying that Thunderbird now correctly uses server side search?
--
Best regards,
Charles
Ok I feel ashame... it was a third party init scrip who was the problem :(
Sorry for the noise and thank you for dovecot
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 15:47 +0100, kfx wrote:
> > Did you enable the 'Run search on server' option in the Advanced Search
> > window? Doing this *should* result in Thunderbird using dovecots indexes
> > server side.
> >
>
> Yes I did.
>
> Some more info:
>
> by telnet'ing directly and issuing:
>
On 02/28/2012 03:23 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-02-28 8:41 AM, kfx wrote:
Dovecot 2.1.1 and latest solr. Indexing seems ok because the size of the
solr's data directory is growing and log shows things like this:
Feb 28 14:30:45 indexer-worker(username): Info: Indexed 12239 messages
in Su
On 2012-02-28 8:41 AM, kfx wrote:
Dovecot 2.1.1 and latest solr. Indexing seems ok because the size of the
solr's data directory is growing and log shows things like this:
Feb 28 14:30:45 indexer-worker(username): Info: Indexed 12239 messages
in SubFolder
but thunderbird returns nothing (it s
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 14:41 +0100, kfx wrote:
> but thunderbird returns nothing (it says not match found for "hello"
> for example).
Test by talking IMAP protocol, not by using Thunderbird.
On 02/28/2012 03:04 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.2.2012, at 2.14, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote:
Ok, I had to fix a few things. First of all, I had to declare mail_plugins
= fts fts_solr in global file (dovecot.conf). After doing that, running
doveadm fts optimize stopped giving me errors.
I ra
On 2012-02-27 9:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.2.2012, at 2.14, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote:
However, whenever I run a search thru thunderbird (searching the
from/to/subject/body fields),
I think Thunderbird does this search internally, not via IMAP.
You could test by opening the Advance
On 28.2.2012, at 12.15, Robin wrote:
> I too was bitten by the configuration issue. The wiki/docs suggest that you
> only need to put the fts fts_solr plugin spec into imap "section", which
> never worked for me, unlike fts_squat which did). Putting it into the
> "global" plugin list made it a
I think Thunderbird does this search internally, not via IMAP. You can test
this by talking IMAP protocol directly:
telnet localhost 143
a login user pass
b select inbox
c search text hello
Yes, you definitely want to check things are being accelerated by
issuing direct IMAP commands via teln
On 28.2.2012, at 2.14, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote:
> Ok, I had to fix a few things. First of all, I had to declare mail_plugins
> = fts fts_solr in global file (dovecot.conf). After doing that, running
> doveadm fts optimize stopped giving me errors.
>
> I ran doveadm index -user INBOX (and other
Btw, since 2.1 is out-performing our old solution so badly, I thought I'd
drop some numbers.
- The old setup takes over ~4.5 seconds to perform our most common
operation.
- The new setup takes ~0.2 second to perform the same operation on the same
dataset.
- approx 22 faster, with less than half t
Ok, I had to fix a few things. First of all, I had to declare mail_plugins
= fts fts_solr in global file (dovecot.conf). After doing that, running
doveadm fts optimize stopped giving me errors.
I ran doveadm index -user INBOX (and other folders). I'm assuming this
actually did something because ja
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 18:26 -0500, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote:
> hi everyone,
>
> However, how can I verify that solr is working properly?
You should see in logs things like:
indexer-worker(user@domain): Info: Indexed 1 messages in INBOX
It should be in Dovecot's info log (see "doveadm log find
hi everyone,
However, how can I verify that solr is working properly?
Background:
- I'm trying to setup 2.1 with fts_solr and eventually test maildir/mdbox.
- I used the following webpage as reference to setup solr:
http://www.roessner-network-solutions.com/2012/02/19/full-text-search-with-so
36 matches
Mail list logo
