On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 10:16 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> imap(pid 5720 user user1): Error: Maildir: Symlink destination doesn't exist:
> /path/to/mail/user2/cur/1285336100.M879758P1166.my.mail.server,S=41045,W=41755:2,FS
This is still something I don't understand. There shouldn't be symlinks.
Or m
> Wonder if attached patch fixes it.
Yes. Thanks!
Wonder if attached patch fixes it. It's about the only bug I can think of in
the hardlink-copying code. The code in hg happened to fix it already
differently.
diff
Description: Binary data
On 24.9.2010, at 23.27, Mike Abbott wrote:
>> Oh, interesting.. What about if you run it with two users?
>
> With two users that same assertion trips. One user runs fine.
And this is with service imap { client_limit = 5 }? It doesn't trigger with
limit=1?
> Oh, interesting.. What about if you run it with two users?
With two users that same assertion trips. One user runs fine.
On 24.9.2010, at 23.05, Mike Abbott wrote:
>> What about just:
>>
>> imaptest clients=10 user=user1 pass=test no_tracking logout=0 copybox=Copies
>
> No crashes this way. It seems to need the different users.
Oh, interesting.. What about if you run it with two users? Like:
imaptest user=user1
> What about just:
>
> imaptest clients=10 user=user1 pass=test no_tracking logout=0 copybox=Copies
No crashes this way. It seems to need the different users.
> This is with v2.0.3 release, not hg?
Correct, 2.0.3 plus your asserts from this thread.
> --enable-devel-checks
Doh, that's what I
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 22:25 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 16:18 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> > Seems related to maildir_copy_hardlink(). No crashes with
> > maildir_copy_with_hardlinks=no.
>
> This is with v2.0.3 release, not hg? I did some changes already related
> to this
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 16:18 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> Seems related to maildir_copy_hardlink(). No crashes with
> maildir_copy_with_hardlinks=no.
This is with v2.0.3 release, not hg? I did some changes already related
to this code in hg.. I'll check 2.0.3 too.
Seems related to maildir_copy_hardlink(). No crashes with
maildir_copy_with_hardlinks=no.
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 15:23 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> > I'll try to narrow it down further (nix the search, turn off quotas, etc.).
>
> imaptest clients=60 user=user\%d pass=test no_tracking logout=25
> copybox=Copies
> does it too... (no search commands)
What about just:
imaptest clients=10
> I'll try to narrow it down further (nix the search, turn off quotas, etc.).
imaptest clients=60 user=user\%d pass=test no_tracking logout=25 copybox=Copies
does it too... (no search commands)
And it happens with zero mail_plugins everywhere.
But this does not trip that assertion:
imaptest clie
> imaptest logout=1 clients=4
> imaptest logout=1 user=tss2 box=shared/tss/INBOX clients=4
Yes, I can reproduce this assertion failure:
Panic: file maildir-save.c: line 79 (maildir_file_move): assertion failed:
(*mf->tmp_name != '\0')
with:
imaptest clients=60 user=user\%d pass=test no_tracking l
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 12:07 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> imap(pid 72709 user specmail773): Panic: file maildir-save.c: line 79
> (maildir_file_move): assertion failed: (*mf->tmp_name != '\0')
I added one more assert, but I doubt that catches this:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/c7a5d25dceb6
> So are you saying that this directory was actually created by Dovecot?
Yes. No migration, no Courier.
> Are these easy to reproduce?
Yes, on my system. I'll try imaptest.
> user1 is accessing user2's INBOX?
Not intentionally. User1 and user2 happen to be logged in at the same time and
w
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 16:51 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > imap(pid 5720 user user1): Error:
> > open(/path/to/mail/user2/tmp/1285335855.M242128P1165.my.mail.server,S=41045,W=41755)
> > failed: No such file or directory
> > imap(pid 5721 user user2): Error: Maildir: Found unwanted directory
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 10:16 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> Hm, I found more revealing errors after sending that message. These are
> scrubbed a little differently, to show two user names:
Are these easy to reproduce?
> imap(pid 5720 user user1): Error:
> open(/path/to/mail/user2/tmp/1285336854.M1
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 09:59 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> ./:2,FST:
> total 88
> drwx-- 3 vmail vmail102 Sep 24 09:00 .
> drwx-- 8 vmail vmail272 Sep 24 09:06 ..
> -rw--- 5 vmail vmail 41045 Sep 24 08:44
> 1285335855.M242128P1165.my.mail.server,S=41045,W=41755
> #
>
> Do
Hm, I found more revealing errors after sending that message. These are
scrubbed a little differently, to show two user names:
imap(pid 5720 user user1): Error:
open(/path/to/mail/user2/tmp/1285336854.M157825P5720.my.mail.server) failed: No
such file or directory
imap(pid 5720 user user1): Err
Dovecot-2.0.3 reported:
Error: Maildir: Found unwanted directory /path/to/mail/user/cur/:2,FST, but
rmdir() failed: Directory not empty
and sure enough, this directory really does exist and contain a valid message
file:
# cd /path/to/mail/user/cur/
# ls -lR
total 384
drwx-- 8 vmail vmai
20 matches
Mail list logo
