On 2012-08-16 7:58 AM, Ed W wrote:
On 16/08/2012 12:24, Charles Marcus wrote:
Actually, maybe (and maybe not, I honestly haven't thought this
through at all, and this might be a really dumb idea), instead of
specific support for this one feature, I wonder if it would make more
sense to actually
On 16/08/2012 12:24, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-08-16 7:12 AM, Ed W wrote:
My opinion is that this is very easily to implement in at least Postfix
and probably other servers, hence I would suggest this is a function for
the MTA, not for the Dovecot relay?
Well, true enough for simpler inst
On 2012-08-16 7:12 AM, Ed W wrote:
My opinion is that this is very easily to implement in at least Postfix
and probably other servers, hence I would suggest this is a function for
the MTA, not for the Dovecot relay?
Well, true enough for simpler installations, but integrating something
like t
On 16/08/2012 09:11, Cor Bosman wrote:
What would be really cool is if you also kept statistics on certain metrics,
like how many emails a specific sender has sent. If this is done right, it
could become a centralised spam sender back-off system over multiple smtp
servers. Maybe something for
>> What would be really cool is if you also kept statistics on certain metrics,
>> like how many emails a specific sender has sent. If this is done right, it
>> could become a centralised spam sender back-off system over multiple smtp
>> servers. Maybe something for the future. We now pay f
On 16.8.2012, at 10.02, Cor Bosman wrote:
>> I'm also considering implementing an SMTP submission server, which works
>> only as a proxy to the real SMTP server. The benefits of it would mainly
>> be:
>
> What would be really cool is if you also kept statistics on certain metrics,
> like how man
On 16/08/2012 08:02, Cor Bosman wrote:
I'm also considering implementing an SMTP submission server, which works
only as a proxy to the real SMTP server. The benefits of it would mainly
be:
What would be really cool is if you also kept statistics on certain metrics,
like how many emails a specif
>
> I'm also considering implementing an SMTP submission server, which works
> only as a proxy to the real SMTP server. The benefits of it would mainly
> be:
What would be really cool is if you also kept statistics on certain metrics,
like how many emails a specific sender has sent. If this is d
On 13/08/2012 19:27, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Timo Sirainen :
I'm also considering implementing an SMTP submission server, which works
only as a proxy to the real SMTP server. The benefits of it would mainly
be:
* It could support BURL command and other extensions required by
LEMONADE. Th
On 2012-08-13 2:27 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Timo Sirainen:
I'm also considering implementing an SMTP submission server, which works
only as a proxy to the real SMTP server. The benefits of it would mainly
be:
* It could support BURL command and other extensions required by
LEMONADE.
* Timo Sirainen :
> I'm also considering implementing an SMTP submission server, which works
> only as a proxy to the real SMTP server. The benefits of it would mainly
> be:
>
> * It could support BURL command and other extensions required by
> LEMONADE. The real SMTP server would see only regula
v2.2 hg now has support for NOTIFY extension. The only thing missing is
support for SubscriptionChange events. Now would be a good time for IMAP
clients to start implementing and testing it. :) I remember K9
developers at least said they were just waiting for Dovecot to support
it first.
v2.2 impl
12 matches
Mail list logo
