On 9/10/2013 9:20 PM, Gerson Moraes wrote:
Op 5-9-2013 21:55, Gerson Moraes schreef:
I would like to know if a patch to the main project would be
appreciated. Could you also please confirm if there are any future
plans involving this feature, like an optional configuration for
custom envelope-
Hi Stephan,
how do you prevent loops, e.g. both sides have an autoresponder
activated?
We use the parameter "days" available for setting the frequency of
vacation messages.
For example, if "days" is set to 1, only one auto-response will be
generated for the same e-mail per day.
So, it prevents
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerson Moraes wrote:
> I would like to know if a patch to the main project would be
> appreciated. Could you also please confirm if there are any future
> plans involving this feature, like an optional configuration for
> custom envelope-from?
how d
Op 5-9-2013 21:55, Gerson Moraes schreef:
I would like to know if a patch to the main project would be
appreciated. Could you also please confirm if there are any future
plans involving this feature, like an optional configuration for
custom envelope-from?
Since it is not direct a violation o
Op 5-9-2013 21:55, Gerson Moraes schreef:
I would like to know if a patch to the main project would be
appreciated. Could you also please confirm if there are any future
plans involving this feature, like an optional configuration for
custom envelope-from?
Since it is not direct a violation o
Greetings,
I have found an issue in the interaction between sieve vacation messages
and the SPF, DKIM and DMARC email validation systems.
For example, let's say we have a message coming from a...@a.com to b...@b.com
at a server imap.mydomain.com. The account b...@b.com has a vacation rule
in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Ch Chai wrote:
When I try to active Vacation Notice using Egroupware, I can see (.sieve)
generated in mail server. but not working.
* Which sieve related lines can you see in your dovecot logfiles?
* Is .dovecot.sieve corr
Ch Chai wrote:
> pigeonhole - 2.0.15
There is definitely no pigeonhole version 2.0.15, see [1].
- latest pigeonhole version for Dovecot 2.0.x is 0.2.6
- latest pigeonhole version for Dovecot 2.1.x is 0.3.3
Which mechanism are you using for delivery from your MTA to Dovecot?
dovecot-lda or any oth
original message-
From: "Daniel Parthey" daniel.part...@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
To: "Ch Chai" chc...@acelsys.com
CC: dovecot@dovecot.org
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 02:08:14 +0100
-
> Hi,
>
> Happy new year to everyone
Ch Chai skrev den 2012-12-31 08:11:
* found this path when by run this command : doveadm log find
Debug: /var/log/dovecot-debug.log
Info: /var/log/dovecot-info.log
above 2 is a good example on how to make it logs
Warning: /var/log/dovecot.log
Error: /var/log/dovecot.log
Fatal: /var/log/dovec
Hi,
Happy new year to everyone on this list :)
Ch Chai wrote:
> >> >> When I try to active Vacation Notice using Egroupware, I can see
> >> >> (.sieve)
> >> >> generated in mail server. but not working.
> >> >
> >> > * Which sieve related lines can you see in your dovecot logfiles?
> > You c
original message-
From: "Daniel Parthey" daniel.part...@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
To: "Ch Chai" chc...@acelsys.com
CC: dovecot@dovecot.org
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 05:56:55 +0100
-
> Ch Chai wrote:
>> > Ch Chai wrote:
original message-
From: "Daniel Parthey" daniel.part...@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
To: "Ch Chai" chc...@acelsys.com
CC: dovecot@dovecot.org
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 05:56:55 +0100
-
> Ch Chai wrote:
>> > Ch Chai wrote:
Ch Chai wrote:
> > Ch Chai wrote:
> >> When I try to active Vacation Notice using Egroupware, I can see
> >> (.sieve)
> >> generated in mail server. but not working.
> >
> > * Which sieve related lines can you see in your dovecot logfiles?
> > * Is .dovecot.sieve correctly symlinked to .si
original message-
From: "Daniel Parthey" daniel.part...@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
To: "Ch Chai" chc...@acelsys.com
CC: dovecot@dovecot.org
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 04:18:46 +0100
-
> Ch Chai wrote:
>> When I try to ac
Ch Chai wrote:
> When I try to active Vacation Notice using Egroupware, I can see (.sieve)
> generated in mail server. but not working.
* Which sieve related lines can you see in your dovecot logfiles?
* Is .dovecot.sieve correctly symlinked to .sieve?
* Can you post the contents of the x
To Dovecot,
When I try to active Vacation Notice using Egroupware, I can see (.sieve)
generated in mail server. but not working.
OS : Fedora 14
Installed Packages:
- Postfix
- Dovecot (2.0.15) note : come with Fedora 14
- Dovecot-pigeonhole (2.0.15) note: come with Fedora 14
- ispconfig 2
-
On 26/11/12 20:17, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 11/26/2012 6:31 PM, cfowler wrote:
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for example
re
At 6PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
> On 26-11-2012 17:59, Ben Morrow wrote:
> > At 5PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
> >> Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
> >> Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
> >> vacation
On 11/26/2012 6:59 PM, Ben Morrow wrote:
At 5PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
This setting turns that check off, in which case Pigeonhole
will send a vacation response (despite the standard) but sends it from
Postmaster.
Actually, this shouldn't have happened. Originally, it would
On 11/26/2012 6:31 PM, cfowler wrote:
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for example
reply, sieve script and dovecot -n output)
On 26-11-2012 17:59, Ben Morrow wrote:
At 5PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for exam
At 5PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
> Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
> Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
> vacation.
> Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for example
> reply, sieve script and do
Am 26.11.2012 18:31, schrieb cfowler:
> Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
<> is not really the postmaster address, its special for the mailer daemon
> Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
> vacation.
at my knowledge, does not work
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for example
reply, sieve script and dovecot -n output)
Any help appreciated!
-
Hi to all
Here is the following scheme: Dovecot in a link with AD.
For LDA and IMAP different views are used in a base.
For example there is a user with such e-mail type - 1.n...@domain.ltd
with the name of authorization auth_1.name.
Incoming male folds up in /var/mail/domain/auth_1.name
When
Hi,
I'm sure that it WAS working, but I can't guarantee...
On a system with dovecot 2.0.16 and dovecot-pigeonhole-2.0_0.2.5.
Today a user reported that vacation autoreponse did not work for him.
As I have checked the dovecot logs, I see such a message:
Jun 04 13:39:51 lmtp(9986, u...@xxx.com):
save me a
lot of work.
Thank you once again
From: Tamsy
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] vacation plugins for squirrelmail
Seems not to be attached to my former mail. Here it comes again, inline:
avelsieve
/*global $avelsieve_cyrusadmins_map;
$avelsieve_cyrusadmins_map = array(
'cyrusimap' => 'cyrussieve'
);*/
$conservative = false;
$useimages = true;
global $translate_return_msgs;
$translate_return_msgs = false;
$imagetheme = 'famfamfam';
//$imagetheme =
enable_rules;
$avelsieve_enable_rules = array();
global $avelsieve_rules_settings;
$avelsieve_rules_settings = array();
foreach($avelsieve_enable_rules as $r) {
if(file_exists(SM_PATH . 'plugins/avelsieve/config/rule.'.$r.'.php')) {
require(SM_PATH . 'plugins/ave
avelsieve_enable_rules;
$avelsieve_enable_rules = array();
global $avelsieve_rules_settings;
$avelsieve_rules_settings = array();
foreach($avelsieve_enable_rules as $r) {
if(file_exists(SM_PATH . 'plugins/avelsieve/config/rule.'.$r.'.php')) {
require(SM_PATH . 'p
__
From: Artur Zaprzała
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Cc: Daminto Lie
Sent: Thursday, 12 April 2012 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] vacation plugins for squirrelmail
Daminto Lie wrote:
Hi,
I am afraid I
have a question to ask of you all. I have just completed setting up a mail
server running on Ubu
g changes to the dovecot.conf.
Any help would be very much appreciated.
Thank you
From: Artur Zaprzała
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Cc: Daminto Lie
Sent: Thursday, 12 April 2012 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] vacation plugins for squirrelmail
Daminto Lie wrote
Daminto Lie wrote:
Hi,
I am afraid I have a question to ask of you all. I have just completed setting
up a mail server running on Ubuntu Server 10.04. It has postfix, dovecot
1.2.19, LDAP and squirrelmail as the webmail. I have also created virtual users
accounts on the system through LDAP. I
Hi,
I am afraid I have a question to ask of you all. I have just completed setting
up a mail server running on Ubuntu Server 10.04. It has postfix, dovecot
1.2.19, LDAP and squirrelmail as the webmail. I have also created virtual users
accounts on the system through LDAP. I can send and receive
On 2/3/2012 5:41 PM, Gedalya wrote:
On 02/03/2012 10:27 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* l...@airstreamcomm.net:
We are moving our inbound mail to use dovecot LMTP in the near
future and
we are looking for suggestions on how to implement a mysql based
vacation
system. If anyone has experience w
On 02/03/2012 01:34 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 03.02.2012 19:32, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 03.02.2012 17:41, schrieb Gedalya:
On 02/03/2012 10:27 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* l...@airstreamcomm.net:
We are moving our inbound mail to use dovecot LMTP in the near future
and
we are loo
Am 03.02.2012 19:32, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 03.02.2012 17:41, schrieb Gedalya:
>> On 02/03/2012 10:27 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>> * l...@airstreamcomm.net:
We are moving our inbound mail to use dovecot LMTP in the near future
and
we are looking for suggestions on how to
Am 03.02.2012 17:41, schrieb Gedalya:
> On 02/03/2012 10:27 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * l...@airstreamcomm.net:
>>> We are moving our inbound mail to use dovecot LMTP in the near future
>>> and
>>> we are looking for suggestions on how to implement a mysql based
>>> vacation
>>> system. If an
On 02/03/2012 10:27 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* l...@airstreamcomm.net:
We are moving our inbound mail to use dovecot LMTP in the near future and
we are looking for suggestions on how to implement a mysql based vacation
system. If anyone has experience with this, good or bad please let us
kno
* l...@airstreamcomm.net :
> We are moving our inbound mail to use dovecot LMTP in the near future and
> we are looking for suggestions on how to implement a mysql based vacation
> system. If anyone has experience with this, good or bad please let us
> know.
Why not use sieve?
--
Ralf Hildebran
We are moving our inbound mail to use dovecot LMTP in the near future and
we are looking for suggestions on how to implement a mysql based vacation
system. If anyone has experience with this, good or bad please let us
know.
Op 16-6-2011 16:08, Vegard Svanberg schreef:
Vacation (Sieve) replies to the envelope address. However, I have a
customer which receive e-mails from a service which sends e-mails on
behalf of a user (submitted through a web form).
So an e-mail would be like (envelope from and from-header is
webf
Vacation (Sieve) replies to the envelope address. However, I have a
customer which receive e-mails from a service which sends e-mails on
behalf of a user (submitted through a web form).
So an e-mail would be like (envelope from and from-header is
webformfromwhate...@foobar.com):
From: webformfrom
Hi Stephan, you were right.
The problem was that there is 2 instances of dovecot running, and while
I configured one of them, the other is listening in port 2000.
Thanks again and my apologies for the inconvenience.
Pablo
Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 8-5-2011 1:47, Pablo Luchetti schreef:
Thanks
Hello Stephan:
Here are 4 distinct tests with all data requested.
In all of them, dovecot answer is:
NO "Script name 'sogo' is reserved for internal use."
I don't understand why. Remember that I captured the traffic with
tcpflow, and then, when telneting
to port 2000, if I change
PUTSCRIPT "sogo
Op 8-5-2011 1:47, Pablo Luchetti schreef:
Thanks Stephan, but doesn't work.
I try both
plugin:
sieve: ~/sieve/
and
plugin:
sieve: ~/.dovecot.sieve
Could you enable mail_debug and show me any relevant log lines?
Regards,
Stephan.
Thanks Stephan, but doesn't work.
I try both
plugin:
sieve: ~/sieve/
and
plugin:
sieve: ~/.dovecot.sieve
But still have message:
NO "Script name 'sogo' is reserved for internal use."
Regards,
Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:14 PM, Pablo Luchetti wrote:
Hi, I have a problem with dovec
Thanks Stephan, but doesn't work.
I try both
plugin:
sieve: ~/sieve/
and
plugin:
sieve: ~/.dovecot.sieve
But still have message:
NO "Script name 'sogo' is reserved for internal use."
Regards,
Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:14 PM, Pablo Luchetti wrote:
Hi, I have a problem with dovec
On 5/6/2011 10:14 PM, Pablo Luchetti wrote:
Hi, I have a problem with dovecot's sieve and SOGo (
http://www.sogo.nu/ )
I have installed last version of sogo ( 1.3.6) in one virtual machine
with ubuntu, lucid.
In another virtualmachine with ubuntu jaunty is running dovecot (
1:1.1.11-0ubuntu4.
Hi, I have a problem with dovecot's sieve and SOGo ( http://www.sogo.nu/ )
I have installed last version of sogo ( 1.3.6) in one virtual machine
with ubuntu, lucid.
In another virtualmachine with ubuntu jaunty is running dovecot (
1:1.1.11-0ubuntu4.1 )
When try to activate vacation function,
dovecot 1.2.9
---
I wanna know how the vacation script works.
I don't understand why it tries to find locally (using LDAP) a
recipient for the "vacation notification email". On the log,
"sender_em...@gmail.com" is the person sending email to
"la...@my.domain.org", which is on vacation.
On 8/11/10 1:03 PM Charles Marcus wrote:
If the below replies to *all* messages, it is broken. I don't understand
the code, but I don't see any attempt to detect any of the numerous
situations where a vacation message shoul NOT be sent (like dovecot list
messages, for just one example).
thats w
If the below replies to *all* messages, it is broken. I don't understand
the code, but I don't see any attempt to detect any of the numerous
situations where a vacation message shoul NOT be sent (like dovecot list
messages, for just one example).
Richard Gliebe wrote:
> On 8/11/10 10:43 AM Jerrale
On 8/11/10 10:43 AM Jerrale G wrote:
Yes, you can use procmail and maildrop. It isn't integrated; so, the
configuration will be extensive. It would be better, in this case, to
only use dovecot for sasl and have procmail or maildrop an executable of
your SMTP (postfix or w/e)
~/.procmail is th
On 8/11/2010 4:19 AM, Richard Gliebe wrote:
On 8/11/10 10:02 AM Jerrale G wrote:
Let the list know if you need anymore help!
is there another solution available than sieve?
As I read, sieve works only with dovecot 1.1 and above.
At the moment, we are running v 1.0.7.
and I need a "out of of
On 8/11/10 10:02 AM Jerrale G wrote:
Let the list know if you need anymore help!
is there another solution available than sieve?
As I read, sieve works only with dovecot 1.1 and above.
At the moment, we are running v 1.0.7.
and I need a "out of office" solution for our running version of dove
On 8/11/2010 3:18 AM, Richard Gliebe wrote:
Hi all,
is it possible to install/activate a "out of office" messages for each
user in dovecot?
I've read about the Sieve scripts, but can't find a howto to install
it on your dovecot 1.0.7 installation.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve
...
Wit
Hi all,
is it possible to install/activate a "out of office" messages for each
user in dovecot?
I've read about the Sieve scripts, but can't find a howto to install it
on your dovecot 1.0.7 installation.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve
...
With v1.1 it's possible to include other Sieve sc
Timo Sirainen wrote, On 2010. 03. 10. 10:50:
On 10.3.2010, at 10.57, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
The autoreply function is wors fine, but the email address are not saved, so
when the sender sents more mail, an autoreply email is received again and again.
Hmm, the text part looks broken,
On 10.3.2010, at 10.57, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>> The autoreply function is wors fine, but the email address are not saved, so
>> when the sender sents more mail, an autoreply email is received again and
>> again.
>
> Hmm, the text part looks broken, esp. with "text:" token, but you said, it's
Papp Tamás wrote:
hi All,
One of my users created this sieve script via roundcube's avelsieve
implementation:
The text is in hungarian.
The autoreply function is wors fine, but the email address are not
saved, so when the sender sents more mail, an autoreply email is
received again and a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Papp Tamás wrote:
The autoreply function is wors fine, but the email address are not saved, so
when the sender sents more mail, an autoreply email is received again and
again.
Hmm, the text part looks broken, esp. with "text:"
hi All,
One of my users created this sieve script via roundcube's avelsieve
implementation:
# This script has been automatically generated by avelsieve
# (Sieve Mail Filters Plugin for Squirrelmail)
# Warning: If you edit this manually, then the changes will not
# be reflected in the users' f
On December 2, 2009 2:31:12 AM -0800 Frank Cusack
wrote:
If you want to use this patch, you might want to consider using a
magic number (e.g. 999) for :days instead of 0, so that users unaware
of the magic number can't easily send unthrottled vacation responses.
Just change the
"Just" is
On November 29, 2009 10:15:55 AM -0800 Frank Cusack
wrote:
Easy enough for me to patch the sieve code which is likely what I'll do.
Here it is. I decided to store the timestamp (dup) info even though
it isn't used when deciding to send a response, because
1) it saves the addresses that vacat
Just wanted to followup to encourage anyone who thought this was a stupid
idea to speak up. I know in the past we (other companies I've been at)
have always had an autoresponder program and the MTA was set to deliver
to that program. I see no reason for that to not just be sieve.
-frank
On Nov
On November 24, 2009 11:44:52 AM +0800 Patrick Nagel
wrote:
set 'days' to 1, there was an outcry by other project managers that the
contacts would probably not read the auto reply on the first time, or
forget about it immediately, and then send more mails during the day. I
had a lengthy discussi
On November 24, 2009 11:44:52 AM +0800 Patrick Nagel
wrote:
Someone will probably ask why an auto reply to the same person more than
once a day might be necessary.
In my case I want an autoresponder for a shared email account. info@
"Your message has been received, thank you blah bah".
Easy
Fire the new manager, eh?
Now you need to keep TWO old addresses working for the same position!
Stop compounding the issue! ;)
Thomas Berezansky
Merrimack Valley Library Consortium
Quoting Charles Marcus :
On 11/24/2009, Patrick Nagel (patrick.na...@star-group.net) wrote:
2. Add the x-ma
On 11/24/2009, Thomas Harold (thomas-li...@nybeta.com) wrote:
> 3. (slightly different) Have the vacation auto-reply set and also use
> the sieve redirect method after the vacation message gets processed?
>
> redirect :copy "newmana...@example.com";
Different how? Thats was my #1 option, combined
On 11/24/2009, Patrick Nagel (patrick.na...@star-group.net) wrote:
>> 2. Add the x-managers account to your replacements email client, so they
>> can check it as well as theirs.
> 2. is what we did.
>> In either case you could also enable the vacation message notification
>> if you like, but once
On 11/24/2009 6:27 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 11/23/2009, Patrick Nagel (patrick.na...@star-group.net) wrote:
Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly by
the other project managers. They wanted to have some "transit time" in
which the replacement guy would still acce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charles,
On 2009-11-24 19:27, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 11/23/2009, Patrick Nagel (patrick.na...@star-group.net) wrote:
>> Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly by
>> the other project managers. They wanted to have so
On 11/23/2009, Patrick Nagel (patrick.na...@star-group.net) wrote:
> Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly by
> the other project managers. They wanted to have some "transit time" in
> which the replacement guy would still access the leaving guy's mailbox.
>
> They fe
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
Shouldn't that be more like:
reject "this guy is gone";
keep;
Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly by
the other project managers. They wanted to have some "transit time" in
which the replace
On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>> Ah, but that's why I had the "keep" there! The reject message of
>> course could have been nicer and said how the guy is gone but this
>> address will be read for a bit longer but anyway stop sending mail
>> here.
>
> Oh... yeah. I never got p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-11-24 11:58, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>
>>> Shouldn't that be more like:
>>>
>>> reject "this guy is gone"; keep;
>>
>> Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly
On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>> Shouldn't that be more like:
>>
>> reject "this guy is gone";
>> keep;
>
> Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly by
> the other project managers. They wanted to have some "transit time" in
> which the replacement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Timo,
On 2009-11-24 11:50, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>
>> Someone will probably ask why an auto reply to the same person more than
>> once a day might be necessary. This is why I needed it:
>> A proj
On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> Someone will probably ask why an auto reply to the same person more than
> once a day might be necessary. This is why I needed it:
> A project manager was leaving the company, and the contacts writing him
> had to be informed that they should wr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-11-24 00:38, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On November 23, 2009 1:19:00 PM +0100 Rene Bakkum
> wrote:
>>Is there an option to for example
>> auto-reply on every mail that is sendto @domain.com?
>
> The part of this question that was overlooke
Rene Bakkum wrote:
I don't like catch-all addresses either, and I have almost never used
them myself. But our customers seems to like them sometimes, so I can't
ignore their wishes.
You can't do it with Sieve 'vacation'. Listing the exact address is
required.
~Seth
On November 23, 2009 1:19:00 PM +0100 Rene Bakkum
wrote:
Is there an option to for example
auto-reply on every mail that is sendto @domain.com?
The part of this question that was overlooked is "on every mail".
It would be nice if '0' days meant respond to every message.
Alternatively, can
Thanks for all the response.
I understand the desire to have a catch-all address, I used to do it
myself a few years ago. But the aggravation eventually caused me to
reevaluate whether it was worth all of the dictionary attack spam. So
I setup aliases in postfix for all of the addresses tha
On 11/23/2009 7:19 AM, Rene Bakkum wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to get my vacation messages to work correctly. In general it
works like how I want, and replies when a message is arived to for
example i...@domain.com, but I have some problems to get my vacation
message to work on catch-all boxes
On 11/23/2009, Pascal Volk wrote:
> No, a 'Catch-all-vacation' reply is not possible.
And is a horrible idea anyway...
On 11/23/2009 01:19 PM Rene Bakkum wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to get my vacation messages to work correctly. In general it
> works like how I want, and replies when a message is arived to for
> example i...@domain.com, but I have some problems to get my vacation
> message to work on ca
Hello all,
I am trying to get my vacation messages to work correctly. In general it
works like how I want, and replies when a message is arived to for
example i...@domain.com, but I have some problems to get my vacation
message to work on catch-all boxes. Is there an option to for example
aut
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 08:05 -0500, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:51:26 +0100
> selaci selaci replied:
>
> I guess he was in such a hurry to start on his vacation that he
> neglected to leave a message.
LOL I was thinking that too :)
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:51:26 +0100
selaci selaci replied:
I guess he was in such a hurry to start on his vacation that he
neglected to leave a message.
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
|===
|===
|===
|===
|
I should have been a country-western singer. After all, I'm
Hi there Timo.
Your suggestion worked like a charm. Thanks a lot for this and all your
hard work on Dovecot.
Tobias
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 13:56 +0100, Tobias Balle-Petersen wrote:
Hello
I'm using the vacation feature, but the vacation reply is sent when ever
a mai
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 13:56 +0100, Tobias Balle-Petersen wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm using the vacation feature, but the vacation reply is sent when ever
> a mail is received. What I want is, that the reply should only be sent
> one time to each user.
>
> My understanding is, that a list of peop
Hello
I'm using the vacation feature, but the vacation reply is sent when ever
a mail is received. What I want is, that the reply should only be sent
one time to each user.
My understanding is, that a list of people who have received the
vacation message should be stored in the file .dov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Disregard this.
The user had a type-o in his email address for the domainB part!!
Sorry for the noise.
CJ Keist wrote:
> Hello,
>Another wrinkle with vacation replies. I have user forwarding their
> mail from one domain to our mail server with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Another wrinkle with vacation replies. I have user forwarding their
mail from one domain to our mail server with the vacation reply set.
Here is the dovecot script file:
require ["fileinto", "vacation"];
# BEGIN VACATION
vacation
:days
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Giving up on the sieve plugin and switching to procmail. I found the
following link:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/procmail
This site doesn't saying anything about needing to modify the procmail
source code like here:
http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot
On 7/10/2008, kbajwa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
CentOS 5.2
Postfix 2.3.3 + updates (bundled with CentOS 5.2)
Dovecot-1.0.7 (bundled with CentOS 5.2)
Dovecot-1.1.1 (Updated from www.atrpms.com as recommended by Charles Marcus)
? Hopefully you don't have BOTH 1.0.7 and 1.1.1 installed? ;)
After
Hello:
This has been a long post but I am still trying. Here is the latest problem,
but first the system:
CentOS 5.2
Postfix 2.3.3 + updates (bundled with CentOS 5.2)
Dovecot-1.0.7 (bundled with CentOS 5.2)
Dovecot-1.1.1 (Updated from www.atrpms.com as recommended by Charles Marcus)
Problem:
==
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
