Oetiker wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> I spent some quality time yesterday, tuning dovecot on a server which
>> >> serves as
>> >> an imap-proxy in front of a zimbra setup
>> >> the imap p
I spent some quality time yesterday, tuning dovecot on a server which
> >> serves as
> >> an imap-proxy in front of a zimbra setup
> >> the imap proxy does ldap client-cert authentication and works well.
> >>
> >> BUT
> >>
> >>
- On Sep 3, 2021, at 9:01 AM, Aki Tuomi aki.tu...@open-xchange.com wrote:
>> On 03/09/2021 09:35 Tobias Oetiker wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I spent some quality time yesterday, tuning dovecot on a server which serves
>> as
>> an imap-pr
> On 03/09/2021 09:35 Tobias Oetiker wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I spent some quality time yesterday, tuning dovecot on a server which serves
> as an imap-proxy in front of a zimbra setup
> the imap proxy does ldap client-cert authentication and works well.
>
>
Hi All,
I spent some quality time yesterday, tuning dovecot on a server which serves as
an imap-proxy in front of a zimbra setup
the imap proxy does ldap client-cert authentication and works well.
BUT
I found that the imap-login processes seem to gain 100 MB per connection they
are
Hi,
I'm running Dovecot 2.3.9-2 as an IMAP/POP3 Proxy in front of several
Dovecotbackends. No Director, only static routing to the backends of each user.
The proxies are also working as "SSL offload engines". SystemOS: Debian Stretch
(9.11) on LXC Virtualization
Sometimes I get the following e
2017-12-15 18:21 GMT+01:00 Aki Tuomi :
> Return from passdb, 'proxy host=your-new-host port=143 ssl=starttls'
So, instead of returning the current db output: "user, password,
userdb_mail, userdb_sieve, .."
is enough to only return "proxy host=your-new-host port=143 ssl=starttls" ?
Will doveco
On Fri, December 15, 2017 3:21 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>> On December 15, 2017 at 6:57 PM Gandalf Corvotempesta
>> wrote:
>>
>>
...
>> server would be proxied to the newer one automatically ?
>>
>> Any additional software or only a configuration change is required ?
>
> Return from passdb, 'proxy
A record or
> wait for all users to change their domain configuration.
>
> TL;DR: is possible to use dovecot as IMAP proxy so that even after
> changing our dns records, any user directly connecting to my old
> server would be proxied to the newer one automatically ?
>
&
from the old server to the newer one.
As most of domains are not managed by me and some other domains are
pointing to our server via IP, I can't simply change the A record or
wait for all users to change their domain configuration.
TL;DR: is possible to use dovecot as IMAP proxy so that
thx, I'll try it. Currently I use stunnel as a quick and dirty work around.
Tom
Am 6. Januar 2017 18:04:57 MEZ schrieb Sami Ketola :
>
>> On 5 Jan 2017, at 22.56, tom wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I try to setup a IMAP proxy for my old Exchange serve
> On 5 Jan 2017, at 22.56, tom wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I try to setup a IMAP proxy for my old Exchange server.
> Running Dovecot v2.x on Centos 7.
>
> So far I follow http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ImapcProxy and it seem
> to work. The only but major thi
Hello,
I try to setup a IMAP proxy for my old Exchange server.
Running Dovecot v2.x on Centos 7.
So far I follow http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ImapcProxy and it seem
to work. The only but major thing is with this setup - the
communication between proxy and backend is not encrypted. :(
To fix
Quoting KT Walrus :
On Oct 12, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
Quoting KT Walrus :
I’m in the process of setting up a Dovecot IMAP proxy to handle a
number
of IMAP server domains. At the current time, I have my users divided
into 70 different groups of users (call them G1 to G70
> On Oct 12, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
>
> Quoting KT Walrus :
>
>> I’m in the process of setting up a Dovecot IMAP proxy to handle a
> number
>> of IMAP server domains. At the current time, I have my users divided
>> into 70 different groups of us
Quoting KT Walrus :
I’m in the process of setting up a Dovecot IMAP proxy to handle a
number
of IMAP server domains. At the current time, I have my users divided
into 70 different groups of users (call them G1 to G70). I want each
group to configure their email client to access their
I’m in the process of setting up a Dovecot IMAP proxy to handle a number of
IMAP server domains. At the current time, I have my users divided into 70
different groups of users (call them G1 to G70). I want each group to configure
their email client to access their mailboxes at a domain name
On 28 Jun 2016, at 16:07, Luca Lesinigo wrote:
>
> We are preparing an IMAP proxy based on dovecot-2.2.22, basic proxy
> functionality is already working and I’m trying to understand if having the
> FTS service configured on the dovecot *proxy* would be of any use.
>
> I d
>
> On June 28, 2016 at 7:07 AM Luca Lesinigo wrote:
>
> We are preparing an IMAP proxy based on dovecot-2.2.22, basic proxy
> functionality is already working and I’m trying to understand if having the
> FTS service configured on the dovecot *proxy* would be of any
We are preparing an IMAP proxy based on dovecot-2.2.22, basic proxy
functionality is already working and I’m trying to understand if having the FTS
service configured on the dovecot *proxy* would be of any use.
I do suspect it would be useless, I guess dovecot in imap proxy mode just
forwards
> In proxy and director configuration you can configure only the passdb lookup.
Thanks. I got my installation working yesterday. I have proxies for LMTP and
IMAP (no POP3) backed by a farm of Dovecot servers. The IMAP proxy listens on
70 different IPs/ports and does passdb lookups
Il 07/06/2016 17:42, KT Walrus ha scritto:
If I’m running only imap-login service in my dovecot imap proxy, do I need to
configure userdb or only passdb?
In proxy and director configuration you can configure only the passdb
lookup.
--
Alessio Cecchi
Postmaster @ http://www.qboxmail.it
If I’m running only imap-login service in my dovecot imap proxy, do I need to
configure userdb or only passdb?
plugin did
> not load and run.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> From: Zhong, Xun
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 11:47 AM
> To: 'dovecot@dovecot.org'
> Subject: plugin can't be loaded in imap proxy mode
>
> When dovecot v2.2.21 work in IMAP proxy mode, plugi
, March 23, 2016 11:47 AM
To: 'dovecot@dovecot.org'
Subject: plugin can't be loaded in imap proxy mode
When dovecot v2.2.21 work in IMAP proxy mode, plugin can not be loaded and
work, so my question is: plugins do not work in proxy mode?
Anyone can help me ? Thanks a lot.
When dovecot v2.2.21 work in IMAP proxy mode, plugin can not be loaded and
work, so my question is: plugins do not work in proxy mode?
Anyone can help me ? Thanks a lot.
Hi List!
I **HATE** Exchange-Server. I think it's not able to manage E-Mails,
but we have to use it at work...
Well, we need to read the E-Mails from outside, so I configured
Dovecot with IMAPC to connect to the Exchange-Server.
It works, but I have a problem...
If I receive an E-Mail, an
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Le Moing, Guenhaël <
guenhael.le-mo...@capgemini.com> wrote:
>
> So my main question are :
>
>
> 1) I just made a test and changed "lmtp_proxy" to "yes" in my
> 20_lmtp.cong file, but, strangely, this did not cah nge anything ! The LMTP
> process still recei
ve to start another LMTP serevr, but not
configured in proxy mode of course,
- Same for IMAP : IMAP proxy first checking LOGIN credentials, and
then forwarding to IMAP server running on backend.
As a first step, I would like to continue using my files to authenticate uses
(so passwd fil
Hi Trent,
Thanks for your exhaustive explanation now it is clear. What was unclear to me
was the fact that the IMAP proxy server has to take care of the
authentication in this case of using a master user and therefore it
needs access to the passwords (in my case stored in the mailbox table in
Hello,
I would like to know if it possible to have a dovecot IMAP proxy frontend where
CRAM-MD5 can be used as auth mechanism (assuming I would be using a master
user/password on the dovecot IMAP backend/mailbox)? I have read a few times the
following http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase
Am 17.01.2014 18:09, schrieb CM Reddy:
> I am experimenting to use Dovecot as an IMAP proxy to GMAIL server. I would
> like configure my localhost as an Dovecot IMAP proxy and trying to access
> my GMAIL using the Thunderbird email client. Please share the steps to
> configure a
Hi All,
I am experimenting to use Dovecot as an IMAP proxy to GMAIL server. I would
like configure my localhost as an Dovecot IMAP proxy and trying to access
my GMAIL using the Thunderbird email client. Please share the steps to
configure and access my mails from GMAIL server.
- Thanks
CM Reddy
Am 10.01.2014 09:15, schrieb CM Reddy:
> Hi,
> I would like process the messages at Dovecot IMAP proxy. In one of the
> documents, it was mentioned that Dovecot proxy currently supports on the
> fly message filtering in latest releases. Will it it possible to extend the
> filte
Hi,
I would like process the messages at Dovecot IMAP proxy. In one of the
documents, it was mentioned that Dovecot proxy currently supports on the
fly message filtering in latest releases. Will it it possible to extend the
filtering feature to handle the following requirements.
1. Parse the
Hello dovecot mailing list,
I have a server running postfix and dovecot. I havea configuration
on dovecot that allows me to provide imap4/pop3 messages for local
hosted users as well as for proxied users on other servers.
Basically, i have a simple MySQL table (imapproxy) with two fi
On 06/16/2013 03:42 PM, Yonatan Broza wrote:
> I'm considering patching Dovecot to work as a transparent (and virus
> scanning) IMAP proxy.
> [...]
Have you considered non transparent caching proxy?
On 06/16/2013 01:31 PM, Eugene wrote:
Or, as an alternative, most desktop antivirus tools have a
mail-scanning capability.
But SMTP is certainly better (though IMO even that is not really
needed if you have reasonable antispam filtering and think before
opening attachments).
In my experience,
From: Reindl Harald
why would someone implement a virus scanner on the IMAP-level?
what happens with POP3?
this has to be done on SMTP level long before the message is stored
and not every time a client is downloading a message
Or, as an alternative, most desktop antivirus tools have a mail-
On 16.6.2013, at 16.42, Yonatan Broza wrote:
> I'm considering patching Dovecot to work as a transparent (and virus
> scanning) IMAP proxy.
>
> What is the appropriate feature to extend? (I've considered the following:
> IMAPC and reverse proxying, with IMAPC lookin
Am 16.06.2013 15:42, schrieb Yonatan Broza:
> I'm considering patching Dovecot to work as a transparent (and virus
> scanning) IMAP proxy
why would someone implement a virus scanner on the IMAP-level?
what happens with POP3?
this has to be done on SMTP level long before the messag
Hi,
I'm considering patching Dovecot to work as a transparent (and virus
scanning) IMAP proxy.
What is the appropriate feature to extend? (I've considered the
following: IMAPC and reverse proxying, with IMAPC looking more promising
since it actually parses IMAP communication).
At 4PM +0200 on 26/11/12 you (Graham Leggett) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have some IMAP servers fronted with separate perdition processes,
> and it would be ideal if I could collapse this down to having dovecot
> do both the IMAP proxying and the IMAP serving at the same time on the
> same IP address
On 26 Nov 2012, at 4:24 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> I have some IMAP servers fronted with separate perdition processes, and it
> would be ideal if I could collapse this down to having dovecot do both the
> IMAP proxying and the IMAP serving at the same time on the same IP addresses.
A heartfel
Hi all,
I have some IMAP servers fronted with separate perdition processes, and it
would be ideal if I could collapse this down to having dovecot do both the IMAP
proxying and the IMAP serving at the same time on the same IP addresses.
One of the fields in my LDAP entries contains the canonical
UTHENTICATE PLAIN login.
>
> The online documentation I've found suggests that I should be able to
> configure dovecot as an IMAP proxy and have it log in to Sun Messaging
> Server with AUTHENTICATE PLAIN and encode_base64("user\0admin\0adminpw")
> in response to a logi
7;ve found suggests that I should be able to
configure dovecot as an IMAP proxy and have it log in to Sun Messaging
Server with AUTHENTICATE PLAIN and encode_base64("user\0admin\0adminpw")
in response to a login from the Office 365 migration tool. I'd like to
configure dovecot to r
On 11.10.2012, at 20.35, btb wrote:
> i'm setting up an imap proxy in front of a novell groupwise server. it seems
> to so far be partially working, but dovecot is having trouble in certain
> cases. i expect that it's ultimately due to what i believe is a very poor
>
hi-
i'm setting up an imap proxy in front of a novell groupwise server. it
seems to so far be partially working, but dovecot is having trouble in
certain cases. i expect that it's ultimately due to what i believe is a
very poor implementation of imap provided by groupwise [at l
On 23.3.2012, at 20.24, Gedalya wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 02:12 PM, Luca Lesinigo wrote:
>> Il giorno 23/mar/2012, alle ore 11:50, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
>>> Are you thinking about actual "dummy" proxying (which is normally what
>>> Dovecot proxying is about) or about the "imapc" backend
>>> (ht
proxy could talk just imap
to the backends and use that to serve both POP3 and IMAP to clients. And it's
possibly what happens with the imapc backend, but I need to do some RTFM about
it.
The same proxy_maybe (dummy proxy) setup works great for POP3 too. Very
simple to set up, works like
to the backends and use that to serve both POP3 and IMAP to clients. And it's
possibly what happens with the imapc backend, but I need to do some RTFM about
it.
> However, I can confirm you that IMAP IDLE does work with imap proxy.
That's great, I really want to provide the bes
On 21.3.2012, at 16.43, Luca Lesinigo wrote:
> The issue I'm investigating right now is how to manage a single IMAP / POP /
> SMTP / webmail "entry point" for multiple mail servers... in other words an
> IMAP proxy.
Are you thinking about actual "dummy"
w to manage a single IMAP / POP /
> SMTP / webmail "entry point" for multiple mail servers... in other words an
> IMAP proxy.
> It would be desirable for multiple reasons:
I have recently deployed a very similar setup: imap proxy, mailbox sharding...
Although not exactly li
ably go straight
to dovecot-2.1.x) and I'd like to get it right from the beginning so I'm here
asking for some advice.
The issue I'm investigating right now is how to manage a single IMAP / POP /
SMTP / webmail "entry point" for multiple mail servers... in other words an
I
On 16/03/2012 15:45, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-16 11:22 AM, Ed W wrote:
If the answer is that he will write a Z-Push/Activesync module for SOGo
then I'm all ears! I have been watching SOGo for some time and the main
thing I would miss is that every phone I have ever owned has largely
li
On 2012-03-16 11:22 AM, Ed W wrote:
If the answer is that he will write a Z-Push/Activesync module for SOGo
then I'm all ears! I have been watching SOGo for some time and the main
thing I would miss is that every phone I have ever owned has largely
limited/broken Funambol based sync and annoyin
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 15:22 +, Ed W wrote:
> > I also learned something very interesting yesterday concerning SOGo
> > and dovecot during a sales call with a SOGo rep, but I'll wait and see
> > if Timo cares to chime in on this one... ;)
> >
>
> If the answer is that he will write a Z-Push/A
On 14/03/2012 10:58, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-13 6:29 PM, Terry Carmen wrote:
I'm going to hope everything is OK for a while, since my goal is to
retire
all the old Exchange servers and move all the users to dovecot/maildir
within the next couple of months.
However it's always nice to
On 03/14/2012 06:58 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-13 6:29 PM, Terry Carmen wrote:
I'm going to hope everything is OK for a while, since my goal is to
retire
all the old Exchange servers and move all the users to dovecot/maildir
within the next couple of months.
However it's always nice
On 2012-03-13 6:29 PM, Terry Carmen wrote:
I'm going to hope everything is OK for a while, since my goal is to retire
all the old Exchange servers and move all the users to dovecot/maildir
within the next couple of months.
However it's always nice to know there are options. 8-)
I'm currently
- Message from Timo Sirainen -
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:05:14 +0200
From: Timo Sirainen
Reply-To: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] [Solved] Another hint from the clue box 8-)
imapc/imap proxy user mailbox server location
To: Terry Carmen
On 13.3.2012, at 23.44, Terry Carmen wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 04:06 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> This describes a regular dummy proxying setup. Sure you could still do that,
>> but it's not imapc proxying.
>> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy
>
> The above URL worked beau
On 03/13/2012 04:06 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
This describes a regular dummy proxying setup. Sure you could still do
that, but it's not imapc proxying.
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy
The above URL worked beautifully and Dovecot is now running as a proxy
for a dozen
On 12.3.2012, at 20.57, Terry Carmen wrote:
>> If you can use userdb passwd-file and export the data to that file, it'll
>> work. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/PasswdFile
>>
>> Example line:
>>
>> user1::1000:1000::/home/user::userdb_imapc_host=exch1.example.com
>>
>> Note that you can
On 03/04/2012 09:58 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.3.2012, at 16.48, Terry Carmen wrote:
pass_attrs = ..., \
msExchHomeServerName=userdb_imapc_host=%49.100$.example.com
If the prefix differs, but all of the exchange server names have
the same length, for example 10, you can also do:
pas
On 4.3.2012, at 16.48, Terry Carmen wrote:
>> pass_attrs = ..., \
>> msExchHomeServerName=userdb_imapc_host=%49.100$.example.com
>>
>> If the prefix differs, but all of the exchange server names have the same
>> length, for example 10, you can also do:
>>
>> pass_attrs = ..., \
>> msExchHo
- Message from Timo Sirainen -
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:45:48 +0200
From: Timo Sirainen
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Another hint from the clue box 8-) imapc/imap
proxy user mailbox server location
To: Terry Carmen
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
On 2.3.2012, at
On 2.3.2012, at 0.35, Terry Carmen wrote:
> With the exchange server being returned in the msExchHomeServerName property
> as:
>
> /O=example/OU=INT/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=exchangeservername
>
> I believe this should somehow end up in the userdb section, which currently
> contains "dri
I'm running imapproxy as shown at
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ImapcProxy. In fact, that's my config
in the wiki. 8-)
It's been working, but has performance issues when the Exchange server
that's hard-coded as imapc_host=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx doesn't happen to be
the user's home exchange serv
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:46 +, Ed W wrote:
> On 27/02/2012 08:34, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 01:41 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> >> What do you need the statistics for? I could make imap_client and
> >> pop3_client support some virtual methods, like user.destroy() initia
On 27/02/2012 08:34, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 01:41 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
What do you need the statistics for? I could make imap_client and
pop3_client support some virtual methods, like user.destroy() initially,
which would be enough for your use. I guess I could add th
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 01:41 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> What do you need the statistics for? I could make imap_client and
> pop3_client support some virtual methods, like user.destroy() initially,
> which would be enough for your use. I guess I could add that for v2.2.
http://dovecot.org/patche
On 22/02/2012 23:56, Ed W wrote:
I think it has potential though. I think a lot of the current plugins
on the website could easily be rewritten, likely without performance
concerns, using a scripting based plugin system. I could see that
some other big picture pieces could potentially benefit
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 23:56 +, Ed W wrote:
> On 22/02/2012 23:41, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > I've heard LUA being a commonly used embedded language, but I'd prefer
> > to instead support several very widely used languages, such as
> > Perl/Python.
>
> I'm a perl/ruby fan myself, but I would stil
On 22/02/2012 23:41, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I've heard LUA being a commonly used embedded language, but I'd prefer
to instead support several very widely used languages, such as
Perl/Python.
I'm a perl/ruby fan myself, but I would still recommend a good look at
lua (or python) simply because the
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 22:54 +, Ed W wrote:
> >> Quick followup question - the logout log file currently logs a bunch of
> >> statistics such as mails read/deleted, bytes sent/received. How might I
> >> access these from the _deinit context as above? Apologies if this is a
> >> RTFM questio
On 22/02/2012 19:49, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 22.2.2012, at 11.38, Ed W wrote:
void postlogout_init(struct module *module) { }
void postlogout_deinit(void) {
system("/usr/local/bin/dovecot-postlogout.sh");
}
Add a few missing #includes and compile and enable for imap/pop3 and that
should be
On 22.2.2012, at 11.38, Ed W wrote:
>> void postlogout_init(struct module *module) { }
>> void postlogout_deinit(void) {
>> system("/usr/local/bin/dovecot-postlogout.sh");
>> }
>>
>> Add a few missing #includes and compile and enable for imap/pop3 and that
>> should be it.
>
> Thanks - that's
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:31:55AM +, Ed W wrote:
>
> It seems intuitive that the proxy installed locally could save you
> 2x RTT increment, which is about 0.8ms in your case. So I might
> expect the proxy to reduce rendering times by around 1.6ms simply
> because it reduces the number of rou
On 21/02/2012 20:36, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.2.2012, at 16.33, Ed W wrote:
I'm also pleased to see that there is little negative cost in using a proxy... I recently added
imap-proxy to our webmail setup because I wanted to log "last login + logout" times. I
haven't q
On 22/02/2012 08:25, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:33:24PM +, Ed W wrote:
I think the original question was still sensible. In your case it
seems like the ping times are identical between:
webmail -> imap-proxy
webmail -> imap server
I thin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:33:24PM +, Ed W wrote:
>
> I think the original question was still sensible. In your case it
> seems like the ping times are identical between:
> webmail -> imap-proxy
> webmail -> imap server
>
> I think your results show
On 21.2.2012, at 16.33, Ed W wrote:
> I'm also pleased to see that there is little negative cost in using a
> proxy... I recently added imap-proxy to our webmail setup because I wanted to
> log "last login + logout" times. I haven't quite figured out how to best lo
etween:
webmail -> imap-proxy
webmail -> imap server
I think your results show that a proxy has little (or negative) benefit
in this situation, but it seems feasible that a proxy could eliminate
several RTT trips in the event that the proxy is "closer" than the imap
server? Th
On 14.2.2012, at 5.30, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
>> Actually, this could probably be safely implemented by sending all of the
>> state to the client as a string:
>>
>> * OK [SAVEDSTATE base64-encoded-state]
>>
>> There isn't a whole lot of state to be saved really. Mailbox GUID,
>> UIDVALIDITY,
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On 14.2.2012, at 5.19, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
b login (SAVEDSTATE 1234567890) user pass
I guess the drawback for this approach is that you are explicitly
breaking the LOGIN definition.
No breaking, extending :)
Heh. I should know better after reading about 10
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On 13.2.2012, at 23.32, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Perhaps a way for (trusted) clients to be able to do this? :)
a logout save
* OK [SAVEDSTATE 1234567890]
* BYE logged out
a OK
Actually, this could probably be safely implemented by sending all
of the state to the client
On 14.2.2012, at 5.19, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
>> b login (SAVEDSTATE 1234567890) user pass
>
> I guess the drawback for this approach is that you are explicitly breaking
> the LOGIN definition.
No breaking, extending :)
> And you don't allow reviving the state if using the AUTHENTICATE com
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On 13.2.2012, at 22.24, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
http://lists.horde.org/archives/imp/Week-of-Mon-20110523/052316.html
http://lists.horde.org/archives/imp/Week-of-Mon-20110523/052317.html
These posts neglect the fact that you don't need to issue a
CAPABILITY command i
Quoting Jan-Frode Myklebust :
BTW: do you also have information on the state of select caching in the
up-imapproxy? I got some very negative comments when googling it, and the
changelog didn't suggest there had been any improvements since..
I wouldn't trust it. IIRC, it was added years ago an
On 13.2.2012, at 23.32, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Perhaps a way for (trusted) clients to be able to do this? :)
>
> a logout save
> * OK [SAVEDSTATE 1234567890]
> * BYE logged out
> a OK
Actually, this could probably be safely implemented by sending all of the state
to the client as a string:
* O
On 13.2.2012, at 22.24, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
> http://lists.horde.org/archives/imp/Week-of-Mon-20110523/052316.html
> http://lists.horde.org/archives/imp/Week-of-Mon-20110523/052317.html
>
> These posts neglect the fact that you don't need to issue a CAPABILITY
> command if the connection is
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 01:24:25PM -0700, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
>
> Except you are most likely NOT leveraging the truly interesting part
> of imapproxy - the ability to restore the IMAP connection state via
> the XPROXYREUSE status response. This is a significant performance
> improvement sinc
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:57:31PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > $ doveconf maildir_very_dirty_syncs
> > maildir_very_dirty_syncs = yes
> >
> > but I don't think this gave the advantage I was expecting.. Was
> > expecting this to move most iops to the index-luns, but the maildir
> >
Quoting Jan-Frode Myklebust :
We've been collecting some stats to see what kind of benefits
UP/SquirrelMail's IMAP Proxy in for our SOGo webmail users. Dovecot is
running in High-performance mode http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LoginProcess
with authentication caching http://wiki2.d
On 13.2.2012, at 21.36, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
>> Other things that would be interesting to try out (both from latency and
>> disk IO usage point of view):
>>
>> - maildir_very_dirty_syncs
>
> We already have
>
> $ doveconf maildir_very_dirty_syncs
> maildir_very_dirty_syncs =
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:08:48AM -0800, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, are you running dovecot locally on those webmail
> servers as well, or is it talking to remote dovecot servers?
The webmail servers are talking with dovecot director servers which in
turn are talking with the back
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:14:22PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > The responstimes are not very fast, but they do seem to support
> > the claim that an imapproxy isn't needed for dovecot.
>
> That's what I always suspected, but good to have someone actually test it. :)
> This is with Maildir?
Y
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> We've been collecting some stats to see what kind of benefits
> UP/SquirrelMail's IMAP Proxy in for our SOGo webmail users. Dovecot is
> running in High-performance mode http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LoginProcess
&g
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
