and, as stated in this thread, the doveadm sync command will persist.
For a 8 user environment, it should be enough to do this via crontab,
every some minutes.
Am 25.01.24 um 19:22 schrieb pgnd:
Currently, replication is my life saver.
depending on your use case, and how critical that is,
+1
El 24/1/24 a les 23:33, Gerben Wierda ha escrit:
Respectfully, I would like to ask: please do not remove replication, please
rethink this.
Currently, replication is my life saver. I run two postfix/dovecot combos (on
different operating systems), with dovecot synchronising via replication.
> On 25/01/2024 11:57 EET Michael Grant via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> I keep seeing this come up over and over. My understanding is it’s not
> getting removed, it’s just moving to the paid version of Dovecot. What is
> the cost for a small user license of dovecot that incudes replication
Ok, very very nice of you to make such redundant setup for these people. For
such small amount I would just keep one server, and have everyone wait when it
fails. ;)
Ok with such small user group you do not have any issues with performance with
any hardware. I was creating recently a test
I keep seeing this come up over and over. My understanding is it’s not getting
removed, it’s just moving to the paid version of Dovecot. What is the cost for
a small user license of dovecot that incudes replication anyway? Is the price
that outrageous?
I have two postfix/(replicating)dovecot/rspamd/etc servers, 6-8 human users, on
a total of 15-20 devices (iOS and macOS)
Yours,
Gerben Wierda (LinkedIn, Mastodon)
R_IT_Strategy (main site)
Book: Chess_and_the_Art_of_Enterprise Architecture
Book: Mastering_ArchiMate
YouTube_Channel
On 25
How many servers do you have? How many active clients do you have?
>
> Respectfully, I would like to ask: please do not remove replication, please
> rethink this.
>
> Currently, replication is my life saver. I run two postfix/dovecot combos
> (on different operating systems), with dovecot
On 2024-01-24 16:35, Steven Varco wrote:
Although I’m also a very happy dovecot replication user, I don’t think this
decision will be reverted, sadly.
However, despite of messing with NFS, I will try setting up a three-node
GlusterFS Cluster to give redundant storage to dovecote as mail store
Although I’m also a very happy dovecot replication user, I don’t think this
decision will be reverted, sadly.
However, despite of messing with NFS, I will try setting up a three-node
GlusterFS Cluster to give redundant storage to dovecote as mail store and hope
it performs well enough… Has