Re: [Dovecot] ATTN: David Miller Re: Config review (2.0.5)

2010-10-11 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Daniel L. Miller : > I find this an all too frequent occurrence in e-mail correspondence > - that humor doesn't translate well. My statement had NOTHING to do > with the original author - and everything to do with the fact that > *I* am a Linux novice in general, a noob e-mail admin in particu

Re: [Dovecot] ATTN: David Miller Re: Config review (2.0.5)

2010-10-10 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:57 -0400, Jerrale G wrote: > > On 10/7/2010 8:16 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > >fts = squat > > > > I'm probably talking out of the wrong hole again - but have you tried > > removing squat from your plugin list to see if it makes a difference? > Daniel Miller, > >

Re: [Dovecot] ATTN: David Miller Re: Config review (2.0.5)

2010-10-10 Thread Daniel L. Miller
On 10/10/2010 2:57 PM, Jerrale G wrote: I'm probably talking out of the wrong hole again - but have you tried removing squat from your plugin list to see if it makes a difference? Daniel Miller, Please do not get all defensive when someone asks why they're having performance issues. You a

Re: [Dovecot] ATTN: David Miller Re: Config review (2.0.5)

2010-10-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Jerrale G : > Please do not get all defensive when someone asks why they're having > performance issues. You act like he said "Because of dovecot, i'm > having POP3 or IMAP performance problems". He only said he noticed a > change since going to 2.0.5. Indeed. > You could have suggested to try