Re: [Dovecot] Maybe wrong quota recalculation behaviour on overquota delivery try

2010-09-03 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 08:19 +0200, Luca Palazzo wrote: > Hi Timo, > thanks you for reply. > I'm pretty sure you are right. Quota recalculation based on Maildir++ > standard is too I/O intensive for our system because we have lot of > maildirs migrated from old system. Mail files are missing often

Re: [Dovecot] Maybe wrong quota recalculation behaviour on overquota delivery try

2010-09-02 Thread Luca Palazzo
Hi Timo, thanks you for reply. I'm pretty sure you are right. Quota recalculation based on Maildir++ standard is too I/O intensive for our system because we have lot of maildirs migrated from old system. Mail files are missing often size in filename so now I understand why so much stat calls.

Re: [Dovecot] Maybe wrong quota recalculation behaviour on overquota delivery try

2010-09-02 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 19:14 +0200, Luca Palazzo wrote: > > Looking at mbox servers log nothing seem to happen, but stracing lmtp > process we can see stat system calls to all Maildir files, as if > dovecot > was recalculating quota and regenerating maildirsize file. > > It happens always when L