Le 8 juil. 09 à 04:54, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 22:53 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I had hoped no one would ever try to use ACLs with mbox format.. I
don't
think I want to try to make it work.
Oops, forgot to delete the second sentence. I did it anyway after some
interna
Le 8 juil. 09 à 04:53, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
[...]
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/f3c6cabae3af
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/4c8175452173
[...]
[...]http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/bf4f542ec6df
[...]
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/5d1a52e8d320
Ouch!
After having s
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 22:53 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I had hoped no one would ever try to use ACLs with mbox format.. I don't
> think I want to try to make it work.
Oops, forgot to delete the second sentence. I did it anyway after some
internal struggling. :)
signature.asc
Description: Thi
I had hoped no one would ever try to use ACLs with mbox format.. I don't
think I want to try to make it work.
> And indeed, a file named "dovecot-acl-list" has now been created under
> the _mailboxes directory:
..
> Is such a file supposed to be created there?
It's created to mailbox root direc
Le 28 juin 09 à 18:26, Axel Luttgens a écrit :
[...]
Is such a file supposed to be created there?
If yes, why? I would have tended to believe that it is more a server
internal matter than a name having to appear in the namespace.
[...]
Re-reading the above, I thought it could be worth to so
