On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:17, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-05-21 9:04 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
>> Where is the "reply to list" button on Evolution? I don't see one there,
>> either. All it has are "reply" and "reply to all". The reply sends to the
>> sender alone if it's a case where there ar
On 21.5.2010, at 16.04, Phil Howard wrote:
> There are a number of posters on the list where the reply goes directly to
> the list alone. I don't know what it is they do with the headers to get it
> to come out that way. Maybe you can ask them what they do, then do that.
http://dovecot.org/cgi-
Charles Marcus put forth on 5/21/2010 10:17 AM:
> On 2010-05-21 9:04 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
>> Where is the "reply to list" button on Evolution? I don't see one there,
>> either. All it has are "reply" and "reply to all". The reply sends to the
>> sender alone if it's a case where there are 2 ad
On 2010-05-21 9:04 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
> Where is the "reply to list" button on Evolution? I don't see one there,
> either. All it has are "reply" and "reply to all". The reply sends to the
> sender alone if it's a case where there are 2 addresses to send to (reply to
> all would send to 2 in
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 18:45, Noel Butler wrote:
> like you said, you dont really do mail servers
>
> Id LOVE to see you try even 100K users in mail server situation that is
> ever changing, you'd soon open your eyes up.
>
I know it would mean more hits to the DB.
> The reason we moved from
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 08:54 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
>
> I guess you've been bitten by a proper database solution given
> your apprehension for using one.
>
> It's called experience. I could explain many cases where SQL is
> overkill and overhead. But I don't do mail
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 01:46, Eray Aslan wrote:
> We use Michael Tokarev's tinycdb:
>
> * stable on disk format
> * has atomic updates
> * has a tiny library in case you want to link it statically
> * uses a lot less memory when the process count is large, i.e. scales well
> * rebuilding the dat
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 17:14, Noel Butler wrote:
> I guess you've never used it with tens and tens of thousands of users, let
> alone user numbers well into 6 figures
> and why on gods (or any) earth would I use that load of crap being backed
> up by another form? that clearly makes no sense, w
On 05/18/2010 12:14 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 09:28 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
>> its your network (I hope for your sake).. its up to you how
>> efficient it
>> is.
>>
>> CDB is very fast.
>
> yes it is, if you only have a small number of users.
We use
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 09:28 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 17:48, Noel Butler
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> MySQL makes it such a dream, even with customers adding
> aliases and so
> on, its a simple instruction to mysql via the web portal from
>
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 17:48, Noel Butler wrote:
> CDB, oh dear god, you want to go back in time?
> CDB is no better than any other flatfile based system, it was horrible
> with qmail and it'll be horrible with anything else above a couple
> thousand users, you clearly dont add/del users all the
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 09:05 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 19:25, Noel Butler wrote:
> >
> > %d is derived from the right hand side of a username, dovecot's deliver
> > couldn't care less about verifying the domain, since that is the MTA's
> > job.
> >
>
> No doubt. Howe
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 19:25, Noel Butler wrote:
> > And it did seem to do that already. Mail was sent to dovecot/deliver.
> It
> > included the domain name. But deliver just didn't construct the
> > mail_location correctly due to %d being empty. The resulting path with
> the
> > empty spac
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 16:17 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 14:38, Bradley Giesbrecht <
> bradley.giesbre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > On May 11, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Virtual docum
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 14:38, Bradley Giesbrecht <
bradley.giesbre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On May 11, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert > >wrote:
>>
>> Virtual documentaion: http://www.postfix.org/virtual.8.html
>>>
>>>
>> This seems to be
On May 11, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert >wrote:
Virtual documentaion: http://www.postfix.org/virtual.8.html
This seems to be a delivery agent of its own. I don't want Postfix
to do
the delivery. I want Dovecot to do the delivery s
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> Virtual documentaion: http://www.postfix.org/virtual.8.html
>
This seems to be a delivery agent of its own. I don't want Postfix to do
the delivery. I want Dovecot to do the delivery so it can create the
additional cache/index files (whate
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> Post back if you get this fixed.
>
Bsically, what I need to know from THIS list is exactly what conditions the
dovecot/deliver program needs in order to properly fill in the %d variable
for mail_location. Once I know that ... know exactly w
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:59, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> I have to admit that I am somewhat confused. You have "postfix" listed
> as user/group in the dovecot.conf file, yet you have "vmail" listed as
> the user in 'master.cf". That doesn't look right.
>
I'm not sure which way things are supposed t
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 18:16, Jerry wrote:
>
> > Please post the output of "dovecot -n" and "postconf -n". Better,
> > provide output from the postfinger tool. This can be found at
> > http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger.
> >
>
> I have r
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 18:16, Jerry wrote:
> Please post the output of "dovecot -n" and "postconf -n". Better,
> provide output from the postfinger tool. This can be found at
> http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger.
>
I have redacted external IP addresses and domain names.
from dovecot -n:
#
On Mon, 10 May 2010 17:30:48 -0400
Phil Howard articulated:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 17:11, Romer Ventura
> wrote:
>
> > try using -d ${recipient}, but change the format of the username in
> > dovecot.conf
> >
>
> What does "change the format of the username" mean?
>
>
>
> > What i did wa
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 17:23, Romer Ventura wrote:
> man pipe
>
> ${nexthop}
> This macro expands to the next-hop hostname.
>
> This information is modified by the h flag for case
> folding.
>
But what is next hop? I don't have any next hop that I'm awa
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 17:11, Romer Ventura wrote:
> try using -d ${recipient}, but change the format of the username in
> dovecot.conf
>
What does "change the format of the username" mean?
> What i did was to set the mail attribute for each user in AD, then perform
> a query for it and have
man pipe
${nexthop}
This macro expands to the next-hop hostname.
This information is modified by the h flag for
case folding.
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry
wrote
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry wrote:
> From my 'master.cf' file:
>
> dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
> -f ${sender} -d ${us...@${nexthop}
>
> From 'main.cf' file: (snippet)
>
> virtual_gid_m
try using -d ${recipient}, but change the format of the username in
dovecot.conf
What i did was to set the mail attribute for each user in AD, then
perform a query for it and have dovecot group users by domain, this
way i can have us...@example.net and us...@example.com
Thanks
--
Rome
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:58, Jerry wrote:
>
> See: http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix
>
> Be sure to read the entire page.
>
I have a few times. But now I'm getting a bit of a different perspective on
part of it. The parameters are:
-d : Destination username. If given, the user information
On Mon, 10 May 2010 15:35:15 -0400
Phil Howard articulated:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry
> wrote:
>
> > From my 'master.cf' file:
> >
> > dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> > flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
> > -f ${se
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry wrote:
> From my 'master.cf' file:
>
> dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
> -f ${sender} -d ${us...@${nexthop}
>
> From 'main.cf' file: (snippet)
>
> virtual_gid_
On Mon, 10 May 2010 14:06:27 -0500
Romer Ventura articulated:
> Yes, 1001 are the uid and gid in my system, check your /etc/passwd
> to get the ones for your system.
>
> mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
>
> Thanks
> --
> Romer Ventura
>
> On May 10, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Phil How
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:07, Romer Ventura wrote:
> I dont know what else.
>
> I tried to chwon postfix:postfix, vmail:vmail, postfix:vmail, vmail:postfix
> and none of them worked. I had to go with chmod 777
>
I believe that is because Postfix is running dovecot/deliver as username
derived fr
I dont know what else.
I tried to chwon postfix:postfix, vmail:vmail, postfix:vmail,
vmail:postfix and none of them worked. I had to go with chmod 777
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-05-10 1:59 PM, Romer Ventura wrote:
I had to chmod
Yes, 1001 are the uid and gid in my system, check your /etc/passwd
to get the ones for your system.
mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:44, Romer Ventura
wrote:
What about you
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:44, Romer Ventura wrote:
> What about your postfix conf..?
> mine is set to:
> virtual_gid_maps = static:1001
> virtual_mailbox_base = /srv/mail/vmail/
> virtual_mailbox_domains = $mydomain
> virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap_users.cf
> virtual_transport = d
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:42, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-05-10 1:59 PM, Romer Ventura wrote:
> > I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
>
> That's pretty much *never* a reasonable solution.
>
Absolutely right!
But it's an interim test ... in this case to see what userid the created
file would
What about your postfix conf..?
mine is set to:
virtual_gid_maps = static:1001
virtual_mailbox_base = /srv/mail/vmail/
virtual_mailbox_domains = $mydomain
virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap_users.cf
virtual_transport = dovecot
virtual_uid_maps = static:1001
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
Just realized my email was not going to the list.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:20, Romer Ventura wrote:
> I am using static uids:
> mail_uid = vmail
> mail_gid = vmail
> user = vmail
> group = vmail
>
> else it will do what you describe.
>
I have that, too. But it's not running the right userid.
On 2010-05-10 1:59 PM, Romer Ventura wrote:
> I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
That's pretty much *never* a reasonable solution.
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
678.514.6200 x224 | 678.514.6299 fax
I am using static uids:
mail_uid = vmail
mail_gid = vmail
user = vmail
group = vmail
else it will do what you describe.
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 13:59, Romer Ventura
wrote:
I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
I did chmod 777 to see what it would do, and especiall
I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
I'm getting this ...
May 10 12:45:01 eth0 postfix/local[3416]: A788D685F7: to=<
x...@.net>, relay=local, delay=13, delays=13/0/0/0.03,
dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temp
41 matches
Mail list logo
