Re: Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)

2017-02-26 Thread Stephan Bosch
Op 7/31/2016 om 4:27 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: > Hi, > > I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two > hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. > > In short, I have two hosts which replicate in a master-master type > setup where almost all of the reads and

Re: Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)

2016-09-26 Thread Stephan Bosch
Hi, Could you guys send us your current configuration (output from `dovecot -n`)? First of all, we would like to compare it to a configuration-related problem we've seen in the wild. That is a bit of a long shot. That issue revolves around the target username not always being the same for

Re: Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)

2016-09-12 Thread Stephan Bosch
Op 8-9-2016 om 0:40 schreef Jean-Luc Wasmer: Hey guys, I was gonna report this issue too. New script FILES get replicated right away but changes to an existing file are only replicated with a full sync (looks like this is every 24h by default). My assumption is this happens bc there’s no

Re: Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)

2016-09-07 Thread Jean-Luc Wasmer
Hey guys, I was gonna report this issue too. New script FILES get replicated right away but changes to an existing file are only replicated with a full sync (looks like this is every 24h by default). My assumption is this happens bc there’s no index file for sieve scripts. Cheers, Jean-Luc

Re: Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)

2016-09-07 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 24/08/2016 10:58 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: Op 8/1/2016 om 3:37 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: In other words, the rules did eventually get propagated across, and based on the file sizes they are complete. But there is obviously something amiss with handling of dates (which in turn may relate

Re: Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)

2016-08-23 Thread Stephan Bosch
Op 8/1/2016 om 3:37 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: > > > On 1/08/2016 10:01 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> Op 7/31/2016 om 4:27 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two >>> hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. >

Re: Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)

2016-07-31 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 1/08/2016 10:01 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: Op 7/31/2016 om 4:27 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: Hi, I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. Has anyone else experienced the replication problem? Are sieve

Re: Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)

2016-07-31 Thread Stephan Bosch
Op 7/31/2016 om 4:27 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: > Hi, > > I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two > hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. > > In short, I have two hosts which replicate in a master-master type > setup where almost all of the reads and

Re: Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)

2016-07-31 Thread Michael Grimm
Reuben Farrelly wrote: > I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two hosts, > specifically to do with sieve script replication. […] > Has anyone else experienced the replication problem? Are sieve scripts > actually replicating in live time

Sieve Script Replication Gliches (Report #2)

2016-07-30 Thread Reuben Farrelly
Hi, I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. In short, I have two hosts which replicate in a master-master type setup where almost all of the reads and writes happen to just one of the two hosts. They are