Re: overview zlib efficiency? Summary and added note

2016-03-19 Thread Harald Leithner
In the vmail directory are only attachment stored which are smaller then 64k every attachment that is bigger get into the SIS store. The SIS store has no compression but it seams that attachments are stored in raw and not base64 encoded so its saves 30%? on binary data. Also I wrote that 'du

Re: overview zlib efficiency? Summary and added note

2016-03-16 Thread Haravikk
Not sure how you’re seeing such a high ratio; I tried the same commands on my system (thanks for these btw) and my savings from compression are around 5% =D That said I’m dealing with a much smaller volume (3gb) and I’ve only identified a half dozen or so attachments that don’t have some kind

Re: overview zlib efficiency? Summary and added note

2016-03-16 Thread Harald Leithner
Hi, use "doveadm" to get all real message doveadm -f table fetch -A "size.physical" ALL | awk '{s+=$2}END{printf("%.2fMB\n", s/1024/1024);}' 189247.67MB .. 185G use "du" to get size on disc: In my case with deduplication: /srv/stroage/# du -s -h * 53G vmail 75G vmail_sis without

Re: overview zlib efficiency? Summary and added note

2016-03-16 Thread Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator
Am 15.03.16 um 16:01 schrieb Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator: > Hi, > > may be someone has already done that: Do you have a script(?) tool which > shows the efficiency of the mail compression if zlib is used? > > Something that shows the uncompressed size vrs. the compressed. Hi, maybe my