Re: [Drakelist] Sherwood Mods

2012-01-03 Thread Ron
I would prefer that everyone stay here with this list, and just delete things you're not interested in or offended by.  Multiple groups would mean a loss of information from folks who know about the rigs in various configurations.  Fragmenting the group into separatist groups will just

Re: [Drakelist] Sherwood Mods

2012-01-03 Thread Ron Rubin
This is a big enough tent for all views on Drake Radios. The expertise of this group is amazing. Let’s not dilute a really good resource. 73, Ron K3RON From: drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net [mailto:drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net] On Behalf Of Ron Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012

Re: [Drakelist] L4B Oddity

2012-01-03 Thread Steve Wedge
I remember those little rolls well, as well as working on those old Tek room-heaters. The CRT's had the most wonderfully sharp traces, though - especially the 547 :) Steve, W1ES/4 -Original Message- From: Garey Barrell k4...@mindspring.com Sent: Jan 2, 2012 10:26 PM To: Don Cunningham

Re: [Drakelist] Sherwood Mods

2012-01-03 Thread Steve Wedge
I think there's enough room on here for everyone, and I certainly wouldn't want to dilute what is already a small subset (Drake Folks) of a small subset of folks (hams). If a post isn't of interest, one can always use the "delete" key. 73 enjoy those Drakes however you like... Steve, W1ES/4

Re: [Drakelist] Slightly Off-Topic: EICO 717 KEYER

2012-01-03 Thread Curt
Wow...that sounds familiar! I was a kid in HS in 1963--I could not afford a TO or any other keyer, so I built one in Electronics class. I think I found the TO article somewhere or someone gave it to me. Used it for a while, got my Extra while a Sr in HS and celebrated by buying an Eico

Re: [Drakelist] Slightly Off-Topic: EICO 717 KEYER

2012-01-03 Thread Eddy Swynar
On 2012-01-03, at 8:35 AM, Curt wrote: I could not afford a TO or any other keyer, so I built one in Electronics class. Hi Curt, Back in the very early 70's, I had occasion to meet VE3CSK in London, Ontario, while I attended university there... Zenon used, exclusively, a homebrewed an

Re: [Drakelist] Sherwood Mods

2012-01-03 Thread Gary Poland
Ok, one last comment and I’ll shut up. Regardless of how you feel about the Sherwood mods my point is, for me anyway, its not practical because of the cost. Whether I did it myself or not, I cannot justify putting that kind of money into a radio that’s 30 plus years old. I have had a couple

Re: [Drakelist] Sherwood Mods

2012-01-03 Thread Bob Fish
This is a perfect opportunity to exercise my right to remain silent. But, as usual, I will foolishly waive that right. As many of you know, engineers may set out in the beginning to build the best possible radio (or whatever product), but as the project progresses, other priorities begin to

Re: [Drakelist] Sherwood Mods

2012-01-03 Thread kc9cdt
Yes...for sure.. In all lists there are times when a subject comes up that a certain person(s) are not intereseted in...it's normal. I learn from all aspects of things...even if I have a different approach. Thanks to ALL the great talent here... You make the Drake experience a more pleasant

Re: [Drakelist] Sherwood Mods

2012-01-03 Thread Garey Barrell
Lee - I understand what you are saying... I too am one that prefers to keep 'vintage' gear, Drake or otherwise, as it was! The quirks and shortcomings of these radios is 'who they are', and modifying them changes them from 'vintage' to 'just another radio'. When they were new, and Rob

Re: [Drakelist] Sherwood Mods

2012-01-03 Thread Paul Christensen
We have no problem discussing the modifications, certainly they are HIS [Jim] radios to destroy as he sees fit, and I can keep mine as pristine as I choose. Ouch, that one hurt, Garey. I would hope that not everyone agrees a modified Drake can no longer be pristine. Apart from my

Re: [Drakelist] Sherwood Mods

2012-01-03 Thread Garey Barrell
Paul Christensen wrote: We have no problem discussing the modifications, certainly they are HIS [Jim] radios to destroy as he sees fit, and I can keep mine as pristine as I choose. Ouch, that one hurt, Garey. I would hope that not everyone agrees a modified Drake can no longer be pristine.

Re: [Drakelist] Sherwood Mods

2012-01-03 Thread Jim Shorney
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:31:42 -0500, Garey Barrell wrote: others like Jim(!) who just can't wait to take a soldering iron to a previously unmolested radio!! :-) We have no problem discussing the modifications, certainly they are HIS radios to destroy as he sees fit Well, old man, if that had

[Drakelist] Tune TR4C

2012-01-03 Thread Greg Hemmings N4WVE
I purchased a TR4C and am having trouble tuning it. I followed the manual but when I switch to cw-x nothing happens...it stays in receive and has no output power. Please help! -- Sent from my Android phone with SkitMail. Please excuse my brevity.___

Re: [Drakelist] Sherwood Mods

2012-01-03 Thread kc9cdt
Gang, OK...lets look at a different perspective Lets say you want the BEST radio you can have...for rag chew, weak DX and contesting... AND you only want a Drake in your shack..(to go with your Collins and Halli stuff) for whatever your reason may be... (there are vintage equipment

Re: [Drakelist] Tune TR4C

2012-01-03 Thread Jerry Semones
Make sure you have your sideband switch also in the 'X' position. Jerry K4FJK - Original Message - From: Greg Hemmings N4WVE To: drakelist@zerobeat.net Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 6:46 PM Subject: [Drakelist] Tune TR4C I purchased a TR4C and am having trouble tuning

Re: [Drakelist] Tune TR4C

2012-01-03 Thread Gary Poland
Greg, I assume you do not have a key plugged into the key jack? Do you hear the sidetone? Also try advancing the VOX GAIN pot on the side in the cw direction, turned the ANTI VOX pot fully CCW. You may have a problem with the VOX circuit or a weak 6EV7 tube. You might try reseating it just

Re: [Drakelist] Sherwood Mods

2012-01-03 Thread Jim Shorney
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 07:27:42 -0800, Bob Fish wrote: A good design is submitted for approval and the marketing dept. returns it and says,this isn't going to cut it, get the cost down. So you start making compromises . That's exactly what designing to a price point is. It happens all the time.

[Drakelist] L4B oddity

2012-01-03 Thread richard radke
All, Thanks to everyone who made suggestions. Solder on the pins all look ok. .5Ω's on each filament. I'm guessing a grid to filament short/ leak when it gets hot. I did notice a slight bit of clouding near the top of the envelope that wasn't there before. Maybe from running the

Re: [Drakelist] L4B oddity

2012-01-03 Thread Jim Shorney
Do you ever run with color on the plates? It's required that they get a little bit red in operation for the gettering to work. Also, just a tiny bit of extra resistance in the filament pin is all it takes to dim a tube. An ordinary Ohmmeter won't register the difference. 73 -Jim On Tue, 3

Re: [Drakelist] L4B oddity

2012-01-03 Thread David
Agree. Using an ohm meter would show little unless zero. For example, if the resistance caused by the pin adds 0.1 ohm, then for a 15 amp filament, that is a 1.5 volt drop; 30% less than normal. If you had a grid to filament short you were right on time for the new year's fireworks. I have

Re: [Drakelist] L4B oddity

2012-01-03 Thread K9sqg
To see if there are filament problems, I have found that attaching flea clips to the filament wires (not pins) and running leads outside the amp to a vtvm or vom is a way to see if there is a problem in the filament circuit. Since high voltage is involved, this is NOT something a novice should