Re: [drakelist] Amateur Radio is second class

2004-10-31 Thread George KB2Z
It's the David and Goliath syndrome. Second class, secondary usage, it's all the same. BPL translates into big bucks. It's not going to go away. For now be happy that the FCC hasn't auctioned off our entire HF spectrum. We should all see the handwriting on the wall. It's plainly stated Dont

RE: [drakelist] Amateur Radio is second class

2004-10-31 Thread Thom R. Lacosta
Thom R. Lacosta [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang -- On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Richard Bell wrote: I have a sense of how this is suppose to work, after spending 7 years as a senior member of a constitutional

Re: [drakelist] Amateur Radio is second class

2004-10-31 Thread Thom R. Lacosta
Thom R. Lacosta [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang -- On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, George KB2Z wrote: It's the David and Goliath syndrome. Second class, secondary usage, it's all the same. BPL translates into big

RE: [drakelist] Amateur Radio is second class

2004-10-31 Thread Richard Bell
PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 9:54 AM To: Richard Bell Cc: Drake List; recipient list not shown: Subject:RE: [drakelist] Amateur Radio is second class On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Richard Bell wrote: I have a sense of how this is suppose to work, after spending 7 years as a senior

Re: [drakelist] Amateur Radio is second class

2004-10-31 Thread Eugene Balinski
Eugene Balinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang -- I have one question about BPL. What is the lower frequency limit of their operation ? Does it extend into the AM broadcast band ? If so, then the

RE: [drakelist] Amateur Radio is second class

2004-10-31 Thread Dan Ringer
Dan Ringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang -- On 31 Oct 2004 at 10:53, Thom R. Lacosta wrote: Can you shed some light on the effectiveness of email to elected officials? My two senators in Maryland

Re: [drakelist] Amateur Radio is second class

2004-10-30 Thread Aeinst583
In a message dated 10/30/04 6:39:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/10/28/100/?nc=1 I think K3HRN IS RIGHT... THE FCC IS TREATING US AS SECOND CLASS CITIZENS: No Special Protections for Amateurs BPL operators would be required to notch certain bands,

Re: [drakelist] Amateur Radio is second class

2004-10-30 Thread Jason Buchanan
Jason Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/10/28/100/?nc=1 Fire up your linears and your beacon stations - if you're working the

Re: [drakelist] Amateur Radio is second class

2004-10-30 Thread Dan Cotsirilos
Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 10:16 AM Subject: Re: [drakelist] Amateur Radio is second class Jason Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterence to the drakelist gang