On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 12:58:25AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 03:38:23PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 6/23/24 03:29, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > In case of non-OF match (which
> > > > > includes the c
Hi Caleb,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 03:30:30AM +0200, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> The TCM oncell is the next generation of Synaptics touchscreen ICs.
> These run a very featured firmware with a reasonably well defined API.
> It is however entirely incompatible with the existing RMI4 interface.
>
> Unfo
Hi Caleb,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 03:30:26AM +0200, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> +examples:
> + - |
> +#include
> +#include
> +
> +i2c {
> + clock-frequency = <40>;
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + touchscreen@4b {
> +compatible = "syna,s3908";
> +reg = <0x
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 03:38:23PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/23/24 03:29, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > In case of non-OF match (which
> > > > includes the case where you use software nodes) the match data is coming
> > > > from
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 02:04:00AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/22/24 03:58, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Sui,
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 04:36:50AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> > > Because the software node backend of the fwnode API framewo
Hi Sui,
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 04:36:50AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> Because the software node backend of the fwnode API framework lacks an
> implementation for the .device_get_match_data function callback. This
> makes it difficult to use(and/or test) a few drivers that originates
> from DT wo
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 11:07:53AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2024 at 07:41, Limonciello, Mario
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >> Also a direct acpi_lid_open() call seems a bit iffy. But I guess if
> > >> someone needs this to work on non-ACPI system they get to figure out
> > >> how to
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:51:21PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2024, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > For per key controllable rgb LEDs we need to discuss a coordinate
> > system. I propose using a fixed size of 16 rows of 64 keys,
> > so 64x16 in standard WxH notation.
> >
> > And then sto
indow?
>
> I was also considering to rename config VT_HW_CONSOLE_BINDING to
> VT_CONSOLE_BINDING, as the dependency is on VT, not HW_CONSOLE, but
> at the moment, that seemed more churn than value of clarification.
>
> arch/m68k/amiga/config.c| 2 +-
> drivers/input
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:13:34AM +, Sean Young wrote:
> drivers/input/misc/da7280.c | 4 +--
> drivers/input/misc/pwm-beeper.c | 4 +--
> drivers/input/misc/pwm-vibra.c| 8 +++---
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov # for input
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 03:30:49PM -0800, Alexey Makhalov wrote:
> Switch from VMWARE_HYPERCALL macro to vmware_hypercall API.
> Eliminate arch specific code. No functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Makhalov
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov
Please feel free to merge w
Hi Allen,
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 06:01:39PM +, Allen Ballway wrote:
> Cyernet T10C has a bad default PWM frequency causing the display to
> strobe when the brightness is less than 100%. Create a new quirk to use
> the value from the BIOS rather than the default register value.
>
> Signed-off
Hi Doug,
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:27:54PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> The big motivation for this patch series is mostly described in the patch
> ("drm/panel: Add a way for other devices to follow panel state"), but to
> quickly summarize here: for touchscreens that are connected to a pa
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 11:23:44PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 8:08 PM Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
>
> > > - return !gpio_get_value(ts->gpio_pendown);
> > > + return !gpiod_get_value(ts->gpio_pendown);
> >
>
is simply something I cannot test, so take
> the easier approach of just providing some GPIO descriptors in
> this case as I don't want the patch to grow too intrusive.
>
> As we see that several device trees have incorrect polarity flags
> and just expect to bypass the gpiolib
Hi Linus,
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 01:16:55PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> Populate the devices on the Nokia 770 CBUS I2C using software
> nodes instead of platform data quirks. This includes the LCD
> and the ADS7846 touchscreen so the conversion just brings the LCD
> along with it as software
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 11:22:16AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The ADS7846 has some limited support for using GPIO descriptors,
> let's convert it over completely and fix all users to provide
> GPIOs in descriptor tables.
>
> The Nokia 770 now has dynamic allocation of IRQ numbers, so this
> nee
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 11:35:32AM +, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:57:06PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Switch the driver from legacy gpio API that is deprecated to the newer
> > gpiod API that respects line polarities described in ACPI/DT.
> >
There is no need for this driver to be OF-specific, so switch it to
use device_get_match_data() and stop including various of-related
headers.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
drivers/video/backlight/hx8357.c | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a
recognize the legacy name and keep compatibility with older
DTSes.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
All preparation gpiolib work to handle legacy names and polarity quirks
has landed in mainline...
drivers/video/backlight/hx8357.c | 82 ++--
1 file changed,
devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node() is going away and GPIO consumers should
use generic device/firmware node APIs to fetch GPIOs assigned to them.
Switch the driver to use devm_fwnode_gpiod_get() instead.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
Marked as "resend" since the contents of the pat
The driver is using gpiod API so it should include gpio/consumer.h and
not gpio.gh or of_gpio.h.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/drivers/video/fbdev
The driver has been switched to gpiod API, so it should include
gpio/consumer.h instead of gpio.h and of_gpio.h.
With of_gpio.h no longer included we need mod_devicetable.h for
of_device_id definition.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/encoder-opa362
With f048e8c1d169 ("omapfb: panel-lgphilips-lb035q02: Remove legacy boot
support") it is no longer possible to specify GPIO to control the
backlight. Remove code trying to request and toggle it.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../omapfb/displays/panel-lgphilips-lb035q02.c
The driver does not use gpios, so there is no need to include gpio.h.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
b
values when controlling reset lines.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-nec-nl8048hl11.c | 72 ++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-nec-nl8048hl11.c
b/drivers/video
There are no users of panel_dpi_platform_data in the mainline
kernel so support for it can be removed from the panel driver.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dpi.c | 83 ++
include/video/omap-panel-data.h| 21
There are no users of connector_atv_platform_data in the mainline
kernel so support for it can be removed from the panel driver.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../omap2/omapfb/displays/connector-analog-tv.c| 60 +++---
include/video/omap-panel-data.h
Switch the driver from legacy gpio API that is deprecated to the newer
gpiod API that respects line polarities described in ACPI/DT.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td043mtea1.c | 59 ++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 43 deletions
values when controlling reset lines.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c | 116 -
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c
b/drivers/video/fbdev
Switch the driver from legacy gpio API that is deprecated to the newer
gpiod API that respects line polarities described in ACPI/DT.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/encoder-tfp410.c | 67 +++---
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 45 deletions
Switch the driver from legacy gpio API that is deprecated to the newer
gpiod API that respects line polarities described in ACPI/DT.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/connector-hdmi.c | 49 +++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 35 deletions
values when controlling reset lines.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c | 66 ++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
b/drivers/video
There are no users of panel_acx565akm_platform_data in the mainline
kernel so support for it can be removed from the panel driver.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c | 45 +++---
include/video/omap-panel-data.h
...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
---
Dmitry Torokhov (13):
omapfb: connector-hdmi: switch to using gpiod API
omapfb: panel-sony-acx565akm: remove support for platform data
omapfb: panel-sony-acx565akm
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 03:46:35PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> This series converts various OMAPFB drivers to use the newer gpiod API
> that respects line polarity specified in DTS.
>
> Unfortunately existing DTS files specify incorrect (active high) polarity
> for reset line
The driver does not use gpios, so there is no need to include gpio.h.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
b
The driver is using gpiod API so it should include gpio/consumer.h and
not gpio.gh or of_gpio.h.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/drivers/video/fbdev
The driver is using gpiod API so it should include gpio/consumer.h and
not gpio.gh or of_gpio.h.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/drivers/video/fbdev
The driver has been switched to gpiod API, so it should include
gpio/consumer.h instead of gpio.h and of_gpio.h.
With of_gpio.h no longer included we need mod_devicetable.h for
of_device_id definition.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/encoder-opa362
There are no users of connector_atv_platform_data in the mainline
kernel so support for it can be removed from the panel driver.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../omap2/omapfb/displays/connector-analog-tv.c| 60 +++---
include/video/omap-panel-data.h
values when controlling reset lines.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-nec-nl8048hl11.c | 72 ++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-nec-nl8048hl11.c
b/drivers/video
With f048e8c1d169 ("omapfb: panel-lgphilips-lb035q02: Remove legacy boot
support") it is no longer possible to specify GPIO to control the
backlight. Remove code trying to request and toggle it.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../omapfb/displays/panel-lgphilips-lb035q02.c
There are no users of panel_dpi_platform_data in the mainline
kernel so support for it can be removed from the panel driver.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dpi.c | 83 ++
include/video/omap-panel-data.h| 21
values when controlling reset lines.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c | 116 -
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-dsi-cm.c
b/drivers/video/fbdev
Switch the driver from legacy gpio API that is deprecated to the newer
gpiod API that respects line polarities described in ACPI/DT.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td043mtea1.c | 59 ++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 43 deletions
values when controlling reset lines.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c | 66 ++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
b/drivers/video
Switch the driver from legacy gpio API that is deprecated to the newer
gpiod API that respects line polarities described in ACPI/DT.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/encoder-tfp410.c | 67 +++---
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 45 deletions
There are no users of panel_acx565akm_platform_data in the mainline
kernel so support for it can be removed from the panel driver.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-sony-acx565akm.c | 45 +++---
include/video/omap-panel-data.h
Switch the driver from legacy gpio API that is deprecated to the newer
gpiod API that respects line polarities described in ACPI/DT.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
.../fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/connector-hdmi.c | 49 +++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 35 deletions
...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
---
Dmitry Torokhov (7):
omapfb: connector-hdmi: switch to using gpiod API
omapfb: panel-sony-acx565akm: remove support for platform data
omapfb: panel-sony-acx565akm
...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
---
Dmitry Torokhov (13):
omapfb: connector-hdmi: switch to using gpiod API
omapfb: panel-sony-acx565akm: remove support for platform data
omapfb: panel-sony-acx565akm
Hi Lorenzo,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:38:11PM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2022 23:30:52 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > I would like to stop exporting OF-specific [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node()
> > so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit. We can do that by sw
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:36:00PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 12:05 PM Daniel Thompson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 11:03:15AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:35 PM Dmitry Torokhov
> > > wrote:
> &g
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:50:25PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 2:54 PM Daniel Thompson
> wrote:
>
> > > We need to know if i.MX is shipping device trees stored in flash,
> > > or if they bundle it with the kernel.
> >
> > This part is frequently found in add-on boards so
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:00:51PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 03:32:35PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Properties describing GPIOs should be named as "-gpios" or
> > "-gpio", and that is what gpiod API expects, however the
> &
Properties describing GPIOs should be named as "-gpios" or
"-gpio", and that is what gpiod API expects, however the
driver uses non-standard "gpios-reset" name. Let's adjust this, and also
note that the reset line is active low as that is also important t
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 03:09:05PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 9/5/22 12:47, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > > We know that count is either 1 or 2 here, so strictly speaking
> > > if (count == 1) {
> > > } else {
> > > }
> > > woul
On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 11:30:59PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> I would like to stop exporting OF-specific gpiod_get_from_of_node()
> so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit, so let's switch to the generic
> fwnode property API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
>
>
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:10:10AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 05 September 2022 15:54:53 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 09:00:46AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Sunday 04 September 2022 23:30:58 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > I w
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 09:00:46AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 04 September 2022 23:30:58 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > I would like to stop exporting OF-specific devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node()
> > so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit, so let's switch to the generic
>
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 09:19:02AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 04 September 2022 23:30:53 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > I would like to limit (or maybe even remove) use of
> > [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node in drivers so that gpiolib can be cleaned
> > a bit, so let&#x
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 11:03:38PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:37 PM Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:57:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:32 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> > > wrote:
> &g
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:47:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:02 AM Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 04 September 2022 23:30:58 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > I would like to stop exporting OF-specific devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node()
> > > so
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:41:40PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:40 PM Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:59:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:32 AM Dmitry
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 08:49:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 9/5/22 08:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 6:13 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 9/5/22 04:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:33 AM
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:59:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:32 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to stop exporting OF-specific devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node()
> > so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit, so let's switch to th
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:57:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:32 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to limit (or maybe even remove) use of
> > [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node in drivers so that gpiolib can be cleaned
> >
d-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c
b/drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c
index aa42da4d141e..393c8693b327 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#in
Now that everyone is using [devm_]fwnode_gpiod_get[_index]() APIs, we no
longer need to expose OF-specific [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node().
Note that we are keeping gpiod_get_from_of_node() but only as a private
to gpiolib function.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
diff --git a/drivers/gpio
igned-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/bd9576_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/bd9576_wdt.c
index 0b6999f3b6e8..4a20e07fbb69 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/bd9576_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/bd9576_wdt.c
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
#include
#include
#include
-#include
#include
+#in
I would like to stop exporting OF-specific gpiod_get_from_of_node()
so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit, so let's switch to the generic
fwnode property API.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
index a2c3c20
() is
because it wanted to set up a pretty consumer name for the GPIO,
and we now have a special API for that.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
index 4834198cc86b..4a8a4a8522cb 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/contr
I would like to stop exporting OF-specific devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node()
so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit, so let's switch to the generic
fwnode property API.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/bd71815-regulator.c
b/drivers/regulator/bd71815-regulator.c
I would like to stop exporting OF-specific gpiod_get_from_of_node()
so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit, so let's switch to the generic
fwnode property API.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c
b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c
index 7289872
se it
wanted to set up a pretty consumer name for the GPIO, and we now have
a special API for that.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c
index 68cd4b68e3a2..f0240107edb1 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.c
+++ b/dr
I would like to stop exporting OF-specific devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node()
so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit, so let's switch to the generic
fwnode property API.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c
b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c
nodes.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/output.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/output.c
index 47d26b5d9945..a8925dcd7edd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/output.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/output.c
@@ -133,11 +133,11 @@ int tegra_output_probe(struct tegra_output *o
nodes.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
index 8e323e93be91..929f9363e94b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
@@ -2202,10 +2202,11 @@ static int tegra_pcie_parse_dt(s
software properties (once we teach gpiolib how to handle those).
I hope that relevant maintainers will take patches through their trees and
then we could merge the last one some time after -rc1.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
Dmitry Torokhov (11):
PCI: tegra: switch to using
header
> explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov
> ---
> drivers/input/keyboard/omap-keypad.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/omap-keypad.c
> b/drivers/input/keyboard/omap-keypad.c
> index
Hi Wang,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 05:55:43PM -0800, Qing Wang wrote:
> From: Wang Qing
>
> Use the helper function time_is_{before,after}_jiffies() to improve
> code readability.
I applied changes by Danilo Krummrich converting the driver to use
ktime_t (see
https://lore.kernel.org/r/2022021516
.add = chromeos_privacy_screen_add,
> + .remove = chromeos_privacy_screen_remove,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +module_acpi_driver(chromeos_privacy_screen_driver);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ChromeOS ACPI Privacy Screen driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Rajat Jain ");
Otherwise
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 12:21:47PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Thanks for the review. Please see inline.
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:42 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rajat,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:28:49PM -0800,
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:28:50PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Add a static entry in the x86 table, to detect and wait for
> privacy-screen on some ChromeOS platforms.
>
> Please note that this means that if CONFIG_CHROMEOS_PRIVACY_SCREEN is
> enabled, and if "GOOG0010" device is found in ACPI, the
Hi Rajat,
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:28:49PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> This adds the ACPI driver for the ChromeOS privacy screen that is
> present on some chromeos devices.
>
> Note that ideally, we'd want this privacy screen driver to be probed
> BEFORE the drm probe in order to avoid a drm pro
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 12:29:18PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:50 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:28:50PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> > > Add a static entry in the x86 table, to detect and wait
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 04:02:53PM -0700, Rob Herring wrote:
> .../input/touchscreen/elan,elants_i2c.yaml| 1 +
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov
--
Dmitry
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mail
e
>
> arch/arm/common/locomo.c | 5 ++---
> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/locomo.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-sa1100/collie.c | 6 --
> drivers/input/keyboard/locomokbd.c | 4 +---
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov
> drivers/video/backlight/locomolcd.c
dProperties' or 'additionalProperties'. This has been a
> constant source of review issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
For input:
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov
--
Dmitry
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
allow for
> additionalProperties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
For input:
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov
--
Dmitry
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:16 AM Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:46:31AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 9:49 AM Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > The error messages are frequently in the caller rather than the
> > > frame
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:10 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 05:05:03PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Apparently the patchset has no more comments.
> >
> > Could you take the patches to your tree? At least 1st and 2nd.
>
> All now queued up, thanks!
I
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 9:49 AM Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 09:18:30AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > I believe it still has not been answered why this can't be pushed into
> > resource providers (clock, regulators, gpio, interrupts, etc),
> >
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 08:57:55AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
> On 30.06.2020 20:00, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 8:42 AM Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> >>
> >> On 30.06.2020 10:59, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 8:42 AM Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
>
> On 30.06.2020 10:59, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On 29/06/2020 14:28, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> >> Hi Grygorii,
> >>
> >> (...)
> >>
> /*
> * deferred_devs_show() - Show the devices in the deferred probe
> pe
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:43:20AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
> the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), but
> works with arbitrary firmware node.
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinch
; Cc: Michael Turquette
> Cc: Stephen Boyd
> Cc: Viresh Kumar
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov
> Cc: Jacek Anaszewski
> Cc: Pavel Machek
> Cc: Ulf Hansson
> Cc: Dominik Brodowski
> Cc: Alexandre Belloni
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Cc: Guenter Roeck
> Cc: Mark Brown
> C
Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), but
works with arbitrary firmware node.
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
Andrzej, Neil,
This depends on the new code tha
Hi Linus,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 05:22:07PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> > wrote:
> >
> > > If we agree in principle, I would like to have the
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
