[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-06-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 Hi-Angel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-06-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #14 from Hi-Angel --- Created attachment 132157 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=132157=edit fix FTR, attaching the fix. However I don't know when I get it sent to the ML because I can't

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-06-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #13 from Hi-Angel --- Possible fix https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2017-June/159872.html It solves the problem, but needs more work to exclude other bugs of alike type. -- You are receiving

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #12 from Hi-Angel --- (EDIT: replaced tabs with space in the table) So, actually there're 4 different combinations: | usual run | nosb | HEAD | fails | passes|

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #11 from Hi-Angel --- So, actually there're 4 different combinations: | usual run | nosb | HEAD | fails | passes| HEAD

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #10 from Hi-Angel --- Not sure why, but I can't get it passing with "nosb" anymore :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #9 from Hi-Angel --- Hmm, wait. Now for some reason it fails with nosb also. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ dri-devel

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #8 from Hi-Angel --- Created attachment 131063 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=131063=edit ps,vs,nosb dump HEAD with reverted eb8aa93c03 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #7 from Hi-Angel --- Created attachment 131062 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=131062=edit ps,vs,nosb dump HEAD -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #6 from Timothy Arceri --- Thanks. Looks like a bug in sb optimisations so the output of R600_DEBUG=vs,ps,nosb on HEAD would also be useful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #5 from Hi-Angel --- Created attachment 131044 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=131044=edit ps,vs dump HEAD with reverted eb8aa93c03 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #4 from Hi-Angel --- Created attachment 131043 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=131043=edit ps,vs dump HEAD -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #3 from Hi-Angel --- (In reply to Timothy Arceri from comment #2) > Does it work if you set: > > R600_DEBUG=nosb Yeah, this way it does pass. > Also it would be helpful if you could attach a before and after

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-04-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #2 from Timothy Arceri --- Does it work if you set: R600_DEBUG=nosb Also it would be helpful if you could attach a before and after shader dump using. R600_DEBUG=vs,ps -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-04-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 --- Comment #1 from Hi-Angel --- Ah, a fail output: $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/constantine/Projects/mesa/lib LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=/home/constantine/Projects/mesa/lib/gallium

[Bug 100785] [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail

2017-04-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100785 Bug ID: 100785 Summary: [regression, bisected] arb_gpu_shader5 piglit fail Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: