Hi Tvrtko,
> Commit 9275277d5324 ("drm/i915: use pat_index instead of cache_level")
> added a dedicated gen12_pte_encode but forgot to remove the Gen12 specific
> bit from gen8_pte_encode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
> Fixes: 9275277d5324 ("drm/i915: use pat_index instead of cache_level")
On 07/07/2023 15:17, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 01:46:44PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Commit 9275277d5324 ("drm/i915: use pat_index instead of cache_level")
added a dedicated gen12_pte_encode but forgot to remove the Gen12 specific
bit from gen8_pte_e
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> Commit 9275277d5324 ("drm/i915: use pat_index instead of cache_level")
> added a dedicated gen12_pte_encode but forgot to remove the Gen12
> specific bit from gen8_pte_encode.
Reviewed-by: Fei Yang
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
> Fixes: 9275277d5324 ("drm/i915: use
On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 01:46:44PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> Commit 9275277d5324 ("drm/i915: use pat_index instead of cache_level")
> added a dedicated gen12_pte_encode but forgot to remove the Gen12 specific
> bit from gen8_pte_encode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Urs
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Commit 9275277d5324 ("drm/i915: use pat_index instead of cache_level")
added a dedicated gen12_pte_encode but forgot to remove the Gen12 specific
bit from gen8_pte_encode.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
Fixes: 9275277d5324 ("drm/i915: use pat_index instead of cache_level")
C