On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:56:11 +0100,
Christian K6nig wrote:
>
> Am 11.03.20 um 08:52 schrieb Huang Rui:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 03:34:52PM +0800, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >> Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
> >> actual output size, the succeeding calls may go
Am 11.03.20 um 08:52 schrieb Huang Rui:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 03:34:52PM +0800, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
buffer limit. Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 03:34:52PM +0800, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
> actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
> buffer limit. Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
>
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai
Reviewed-by:
Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
buffer limit. Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),