From: Mykola Lysenko <mykola.lyse...@amd.com>

Currently we reply with NACK to UP requests which might
confuse receivers. We haven't seen any actual issues with
this but should still respond to UP requests correctly.

Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <Mykola.Lysenko at amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 809959d56d78..64a0a3729643 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ static int drm_dp_encode_up_ack_reply(struct 
drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, u8 req
 {
        struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_reply_body reply;

-       reply.reply_type = 1;
+       reply.reply_type = 0;
        reply.req_type = req_type;
        drm_dp_encode_sideband_reply(&reply, msg);
        return 0;
-- 
2.1.4

Reply via email to