On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lord ker...@teksavvy.com wrote:
On 10-11-19 11:39 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Lordker...@teksavvy.com wrote:
My non-Intel graphics notebook (has ATI X1400 graphics) also has a resume
regression with 2.6.36. But it does
On 10-11-19 05:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lordker...@teksavvy.com wrote:
It now comes back at resume time.
So that patch helped?
I think so. It didn't used to resume from suspend with 2.6.36, and now it does.
But suffers long delays (also sometimes
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Mark Lord ker...@teksavvy.com wrote:
On 10-11-19 05:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lordker...@teksavvy.com wrote:
It now comes back at resume time.
So that patch helped?
I think so. It didn't used to resume from suspend
On Friday, November 19, 2010, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20462
> > Subject : 2.6.36-rc7-git2 - panic/GPF: e1000e/vlans?
> > Submitter : Nikola Ciprich
> > Date
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
> On 10-11-19 05:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lord ?wrote:
>>
>>> It now comes back at resume time.
>>
>> So that patch helped?
>
> I think so. ?It didn't used to resume from suspend with 2.6.36, and now
On 10-11-19 05:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
>
>> It now comes back at resume time.
>
> So that patch helped?
I think so. It didn't used to resume from suspend with 2.6.36, and now it does.
>> But suffers long delays (also sometimes with 2.6.35)
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
> On 10-11-19 11:39 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Lord ?wrote:
>>
>>> My non-Intel graphics notebook (has ATI X1400 graphics) also has a resume
>>> regression with 2.6.36. ?But it does work fine with 2.6.35
On 10-11-19 11:39 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
>
>> My non-Intel graphics notebook (has ATI X1400 graphics) also has a resume
>> regression with 2.6.36. But it does work fine with 2.6.35 (and earlier,
>> back many years). As a result, I'm stuck
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
> On 10-11-18 06:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced
>> before
>> 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking
>> team.
>> If any of them have
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before
2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.35 regressions, please let us
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Lord ker...@teksavvy.com wrote:
On 10-11-18 06:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced
before
2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking
team.
If any of them
On 10-11-18 06:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before
> 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking
> team.
> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
>
> If you know of any
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20462
> Subject ? ? ? ? : 2.6.36-rc7-git2 - panic/GPF: e1000e/vlans?
> Submitter ? ? ? : Nikola Ciprich
> Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2010-10-15 7:10 (35 days old)
> Message-ID ? ? ?:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20462
Subject : 2.6.36-rc7-git2 - panic/GPF: e1000e/vlans?
Submitter : Nikola Ciprich extmaill...@linuxbox.cz
Date : 2010-10-15 7:10 (35
14 matches
Mail list logo
