On Thu Jul 9 17:02:12 2015 GMT+0100, Steven Newbury wrote:
> On Thu Jul 9 16:04:35 2015 GMT+0100, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Steven Newbury
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu Jul 9 03:32:40 2015 GMT+0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > >> On 09.07.2015 06:01, Steven
On Thu Jul 9 17:02:12 2015 GMT+0100, Steven Newbury wrote:
> On Thu Jul 9 16:04:35 2015 GMT+0100, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Steven Newbury
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu Jul 9 03:32:40 2015 GMT+0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > >> On 09.07.2015 06:01, Steven
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 23:44 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
...
>
> >
> > I guess it doesn't really matter since patching out the code
> > "fixes"
> > it...
> As you wish. Personally I tend to give it a bit more before giving
> up.
>
I typically would, but it isn't my machine, and my priority is
On Thu Jul 9 16:04:35 2015 GMT+0100, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Steven Newbury
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu Jul 9 03:32:40 2015 GMT+0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> On 09.07.2015 06:01, Steven Newbury wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 21:56 +0100, Steven Newbury
On 09.07.2015 06:01, Steven Newbury wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 21:56 +0100, Steven Newbury wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 09:18 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>>> On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:50:30 +0100 Steven Newbury
>>> wrote:
>>>
Would gles1 be sufficient to run a Wayland compositor, I'm
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Steven Newbury wrote:
>
>
> On Thu Jul 9 03:32:40 2015 GMT+0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 09.07.2015 06:01, Steven Newbury wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 21:56 +0100, Steven Newbury wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 09:18 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>> >>>
On Thu Jul 9 03:32:40 2015 GMT+0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 09.07.2015 06:01, Steven Newbury wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 21:56 +0100, Steven Newbury wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 09:18 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:50:30 +0100 Steven Newbury
> >>> wrote:
Hi Steven,
A couple of more (wild) ideas, below but first...
On 8 July 2015 at 17:48, Steven Newbury wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 17:10 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 8 July 2015 at 14:55, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Steven Newbury <
>> > steve at
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 21:56 +0100, Steven Newbury wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 09:18 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:50:30 +0100
> > Steven Newbury wrote:
> >
> > > Would gles1 be sufficient to run a Wayland compositor, I'm
> > > guessing probably not..?
> >
> > If you
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 09:18 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:50:30 +0100
> Steven Newbury wrote:
>
> > Would gles1 be sufficient to run a Wayland compositor, I'm
> > guessing probably not..?
>
> If you can find a Wayland compositor that is written to composite
> with
>
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 17:10 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 8 July 2015 at 14:55, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Steven Newbury <
> > steve at snewbury.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed Jul 8 14:20:28 2015 GMT+0100, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015
On 8 July 2015 at 14:55, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Steven Newbury
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed Jul 8 14:20:28 2015 GMT+0100, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Steven Newbury
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue Jul 7 15:12:28 2015 GMT+0100, Alex
On Wed Jul 8 14:20:28 2015 GMT+0100, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Steven Newbury
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue Jul 7 15:12:28 2015 GMT+0100, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Steven Newbury
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I've tried an xserver-1.16,
On Tue Jul 7 15:12:28 2015 GMT+0100, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Steven Newbury
> wrote:
> >
> > I've tried an xserver-1.16, and ddx, libdrm without LTO and with
> > gcc4.9. Exactly the same thing. I wondered whether the unused i810
> > could be interfering but
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Steven Newbury wrote:
>
>
> On Wed Jul 8 14:20:28 2015 GMT+0100, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Steven Newbury
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue Jul 7 15:12:28 2015 GMT+0100, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Steven
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Steven Newbury wrote:
>
>
> On Tue Jul 7 15:12:28 2015 GMT+0100, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Steven Newbury
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I've tried an xserver-1.16, and ddx, libdrm without LTO and with
>> > gcc4.9. Exactly the same thing. I
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 10:12 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Steven Newbury > wrote:
> >
> > I've tried an xserver-1.16, and ddx, libdrm without LTO and with
> > gcc4.9. Exactly the same thing. I wondered whether the unused
> > i810
> > could be interfering but
> manages
> > > > to fall back to starting up an X session without using DRM
> > > > swrast
> > > > -only, not something you want to experience on such a weak CPU!
> > > >
> > >
> > > If the kernel driver loads properly and you get a
d you get a kms console you
> > > should be good to go.
> > >
> > > > Manually starting X fails with the "[drm] failed to set drm
> > > > interface
> > > > version." error.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Maybe th
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Steven Newbury wrote:
>
> I've tried an xserver-1.16, and ddx, libdrm without LTO and with
> gcc4.9. Exactly the same thing. I wondered whether the unused i810
> could be interfering but triggering a device "remove" before starting
> X made no difference.
>
> I'm
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:50:30 +0100
Steven Newbury wrote:
> Would gles1 be sufficient to run a Wayland compositor, I'm
> guessing probably not..?
If you can find a Wayland compositor that is written to composite with
GLES1, that's all you need from the "Wayland side". (Yeah, this has
nothing to
console you
> > should be good to go.
> >
> > > Manually starting X fails with the "[drm] failed to set drm
> > > interface
> > > version." error.
> > >
> >
> > Maybe the ddx with that old system was build without KMS support?
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 23:26 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 09:06:28PM +0100, Steven Newbury wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 15:42 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Steven Newbury <
> > > steve at snewbury.org.uk
> > > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon,
; should be good to go.
>
> > Manually starting X fails with the "[drm] failed to set drm
> > interface
> > version." error.
> >
>
> Maybe the ddx with that old system was build without KMS support?
Everything is freshly compiled. The error itself is
manages
to fall back to starting up an X session without using DRM swrast
-only, not something you want to experience on such a weak CPU!
Manually starting X fails with the "[drm] failed to set drm interface
version." error.
It's a very old system, PCI-only(!) Coppermine-128, belonging to a
frie
n such a weak CPU!
>
If the kernel driver loads properly and you get a kms console you
should be good to go.
> Manually starting X fails with the "[drm] failed to set drm interface
> version." error.
>
Maybe the ddx with that old system was build without KMS support?
Alex
Hi,
I've been trying to get DRM/KMS working with the current graphics
stack (xf86-video-ati 7.5, xserver-1.17) on a R200 series card. I
assumed this should be working since KMS was implemented for it a
while back, and it has been working with xf86-video-ati-6.x.
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Steven Newbury wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been trying to get DRM/KMS working with the current graphics
> stack (xf86-video-ati 7.5, xserver-1.17) on a R200 series card. I
> assumed this should be working since KMS was implemented for it a
> while back, and it has been
28 matches
Mail list logo
