Ack, I gotta get in on this too...
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 07:03:40PM -0400, AMD-760MP wrote:
> > To further perpetuate this insanely off-topic thread, using a USB mouse
> gets finer control. I'm not sure about lag, but there's certainly a lot
> more precision. As a matter of fact, when I switc
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Greg Hughes wrote:
>Inline assembly experts,
>
>I've been palying with RedHat 7.1 Beta. This ships with gcc 2.96.77,
>which is much better than the 2.96 bundled with RedHat 7.0. This
>compiler can build the xc tree from the trunk, but it chokes trying to
>build the mesa-3-5
Adam your problem is shown in these lines from Q3:
Using XFree86-VidModeExtension Version 2.0
XF86DGA Mouse (Version 2.0) initialized
XFree86-VidModeExtension Activated at 640x480
Using 8/8/8 Color bits, 24 depth, 0 stencil display.
GL_RENDERER: Mesa GLX Indirect
Initializing OpenGL extensions
.
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 05:52:54PM -0500, adam.edgar wrote:
> I just installed the cvs debs from warp and have found the radeon performance
> to be awfull. My setup is as follows:
> Duron 650
> 256 MB Ram
> Radeon 32 MB ddr
> Debian Sid (Unstable)
> Linux 2.4.3(also
I just installed the cvs debs from warp and have found the radeon performance
to be awfull. My setup is as follows:
Duron 650
256 MB Ram
Radeon 32 MB ddr
Debian Sid (Unstable)
Linux 2.4.3(also tried 2.4.2-ac26)
When I run q3 areana the opening sequence is p
OK... I just upgraded to 2.4.3, recompiled the DRM modules from DRI cvs,
and it's working. Was something done to the CVS code to make it work with
2.4.3, and, if so, could it have had a negative impact on 2.4.2?
Adam
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
> This isn't just limited to
Yes, infact the new .debs are now up.
Zephaniah E. Hull.
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 10:15:17PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
> Is this patch going to be included in the next build?
>
>
> - Pasi K?rkk?inen
>
>^
> . .
>
This isn't just limited to my Radeon, now, either. It's happening with my
G400. I've attached the full log file from when I tried with my Radeon
with a CVS pull from this afternoon.
Anyone want to take a look and tell me what they think? After X locks, I
can still move around with a serial co
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 11:05:35AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > This may or may not have anything to do with your situation, but I
> > noticed a distinct improvement when I switched from using a serial mouse
> > to using a PS/2 mouse. I got a lot more control and my skill level in
> > q
My previous message went to the wrong mailing list. I'm quite sorry.
Adam
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 11:16:13AM -0700, Daryll Strauss wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 02:07:36PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually, the problem is that libGL itself was miscompiled, I'm working
> > > on tracking this down an
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Leon van Stuivenberg wrote:
> > Application transferred too few scanlines
>
> Could be stream corruption, but i'm not sure. i've seen this at this end
> too at some point. if you have TRACKH and OUTPUTH in ~/.bcast/bcastrc,
> what are they set to?
>
> Or try enabling debug
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 11:16:13AM -0700, Daryll Strauss wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 02:07:36PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> >
> > Actually, the problem is that libGL itself was miscompiled, I'm working
> > on tracking this down and properly fixing it.
> >
>
Actually, after a little
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 09:58:05AM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 05:52:22PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
> > Is anyone else getting this:
> >
> > /usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to `va_start'
> > /usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to `va_end'
> > collect2: ld r
>
> > On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:40:44AM +0200, Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
> >> Ok
> >>
> >> Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with
> >> gears.
> >>
> >> I get 125.623 frames/s.
> >>
> >> The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march.
> >> The computer is an
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 05:52:22PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
> > Is anyone else getting this:
> >
> > /usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to `va_start'
> > /usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to `va_end'
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 05:52:22PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
> Is anyone else getting this:
>
> /usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to `va_start'
> /usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to `va_end'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> While trying to link your own (SDL/OpenGL) app t
Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:40:44AM +0200, Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
> >> Ok
> >>
> >> Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with
> >> gears.
> >>
> >> I get 125.623 frames/s.
> >>
> >> The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march.
>
Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
>
> Am think i should also add something to my first post.
>
> I testet gears in a 1024*768 screen resolution with 16 bpp.
> But i didn't changed the screen size of gears itself.
>
> So is that the reason? Should i start XFree in 640*480, or better 320*200 to get
>1000 f
> Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>>
>> > I was getting ~1400 fps with my Radeon on a 600MHz Duron (ASUS A7V,
>> > KT133 chipset), even with AGP 1x. Something's going horribly wrong
>> > with
>> > your system...
>>
>> Are you serious? In all the times I've pulled and tested CVS code, I've
>> never gotte
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
> > I was getting ~1400 fps with my Radeon on a 600MHz Duron (ASUS A7V,
> > KT133 chipset), even with AGP 1x. Something's going horribly wrong with
> > your system...
>
> Are you serious? In all the times I've pulled and tested CVS code, I've
> never gotten above 1000
Hello!
Is anyone else getting this:
/usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to `va_start'
/usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to `va_end'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
While trying to link your own (SDL/OpenGL) app to libGL.so..
I'm using debian unstable and todays .deb's of dri.
-
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
> > I was getting ~1400 fps with my Radeon on a 600MHz Duron (ASUS A7V,
> > KT133 chipset), even with AGP 1x. Something's going horribly wrong with
> > your system...
>
> Are you serious? In all the times I've pulled and tested CVS code, I've
> never gotten above 1000
> I was getting ~1400 fps with my Radeon on a 600MHz Duron (ASUS A7V,
> KT133 chipset), even with AGP 1x. Something's going horribly wrong with
> your system...
Are you serious? In all the times I've pulled and tested CVS code, I've
never gotten above 1000 fps with my Radeon 64 Meg DDR on my 7
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:40:44AM +0200, Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
>> Ok
>>
>> Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with
>> gears.
>>
>> I get 125.623 frames/s.
>>
>> The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march.
>> The computer is an Athlon 500 MHz 128 MB r
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 07:40:40PM +1000, Chris Proctor wrote:
>
> I think these numbers are software rendering. On my machine
> with a Voodoo3 2000 and a dual Pentium Pro 200 I get the following:
>
> DRI:85 fps (monitor rate)
> LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT: 46 fps
> FX_GL
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 08:33:24PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> Those numbers are probably fairly typical, if very poor compared to win32
> numbers. Glide 3 is not exactly fast in Linux unfortunately. As a
> result, 3dfx cards with DRI yield rather disappointing results. Don't
> take that
27 matches
Mail list logo
