Re: [Dri-devel] mga (g200) agp texturing.

2001-09-23 Thread Bill Currie
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:41:16PM +, ralf willenbacher wrote: > that was me i guess. > the rendering errors/lookups are likely the cause why it was never > commited to a branch. > the latest patch i found in my dri tree (16. jul) is attached. > its a gl_decal fix and the agptex stuff. > not m

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM, i810, IRQ conflict

2001-09-23 Thread Keith Whitwell
On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 21:48, you wrote: > Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > Can I remove irq from the current branch? I have no option in BIOS > > > that will > > > disable IRQ for video, but If I had I suppose that DRM would manage > > > with that. Can I simulate "no irq available"? > > > > Turning off

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM, i810, IRQ conflict

2001-09-23 Thread jhartmann
Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > Can I remove irq from the current branch? I have no option in BIOS that > > will > > disable IRQ for video, but If I had I suppose that DRM would manage with > > that. Can I simulate "no irq available"? > > Turning off the irq in hardware won't help you, you need to

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM, i810, IRQ conflict

2001-09-23 Thread jhartmann
Keith Whitwell wrote: > TAU wrote: > > > > Can you direct me on what should I do to get a cvs version working: > > Where cvs is > > what X11 parts should I compile and where to install > > should I compile anything except i810 kmod for the kernel? > > I can't find any ready RPMs for Mesa 3.5, sho

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM, i810, IRQ conflict

2001-09-23 Thread jhartmann
Keith Whitwell wrote: > Michael Zayats wrote: > > > > The configuration is following: > > > > i810 + 2.4.3 + agpgart + 4.1.0 + kmod from 4.1.0 > > > > I have the following problem: > > > > when drm loads (from /var/log/XFree86.0.log) it reports that > > it can't register IRQ handler due to anothe

Re: [Dri-devel] mga (g200) agp texturing.

2001-09-23 Thread ralf willenbacher
Bill Currie wrote: > > I've got the apg texturing patches applied to my checked out dri tree (trunk) > and I was wondering if they've ever been committed to any branch of the dri > cvs tree? I get the odd problem (programs using dri segfaulting at > indeterminate occasions, corrupted textures, "o

[Dri-devel] Sharing IRQs

2001-09-23 Thread Michael Zayats
OK, I have it working.     The problem was in dma_drm.h where 0 was passed instead of SA_SHIRQ to request_irq call. That prevented it from sharing the irq.   anything seems to work ok and I get 350 frames per second in gears!   thanks for help Keith!   with best regards,   Michael      

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM, i810, IRQ conflict

2001-09-23 Thread Michael Zayats
> Turning off the irq in hardware won't help you, you need to have a kernel > module that doesn't rely on the irq. The i810 kernel module *will* share irqs > with other devices, but it sounds like your network card won't. The message I get is: (II) I810(0): [drm] failure adding irq handler, ther

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM, i810, IRQ conflict

2001-09-23 Thread Keith Whitwell
Michael Zayats wrote: > > > > > 1) theoretic: Why at all drm needs IRQ i.e. does AGP sends info back > to > > > > the driver? > > > > > > The irq is removed in the mesa-3-5 branch. If you feel ok about > > downloading, > > > compiling and installing a cvs branch, you might be able rid of the > >

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM, i810, IRQ conflict

2001-09-23 Thread Keith Whitwell
TAU wrote: > > Can you direct me on what should I do to get a cvs version working: > Where cvs is > what X11 parts should I compile and where to install > should I compile anything except i810 kmod for the kernel? > I can't find any ready RPMs for Mesa 3.5, should I take it directly from > Mesa s

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 developers

2001-09-23 Thread Manuel Teira
El Dom 23 Sep 2001 04:50, escribiste: > According to the register ref. (p.4-26), "GB" means "BGA package, AGP: > both 1x and 2x)." I have an LT Pro, which has "LB" in the device ID. > This is in the CFG_CHIP_TYPE in CONFIG_CHIP_ID. There's also a class, > foundry ID, and major/minor numbers in C

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM, i810, IRQ conflict

2001-09-23 Thread Michael Zayats
> > > 1) theoretic: Why at all drm needs IRQ i.e. does AGP sends info back to > > > the driver? > > > > The irq is removed in the mesa-3-5 branch. If you feel ok about > downloading, > > compiling and installing a cvs branch, you might be able rid of the > problem > > that way. However, I don't

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM, i810, IRQ conflict

2001-09-23 Thread Michael Zayats
> > 1) theoretic: Why at all drm needs IRQ i.e. does AGP sends info back to > > the driver? > > The irq is removed in the mesa-3-5 branch. If you feel ok about downloading, > compiling and installing a cvs branch, you might be able rid of the problem > that way. However, I don't know if Jeff has