B. van den Heuvel wrote:
But will it help if I lower my resolution ?
yep, and to reduce the color depth.
its printed in the X log:
(II) MGA(0): Reserved 12288 kb for textures at offset 0x140
but i just realized that my g400 box still runs with
some patch i made.
(no, i wont pollute the
ralf willenbacher wrote:
B. van den Heuvel wrote:
But will it help if I lower my resolution ?
yep, and to reduce the color depth.
its printed in the X log:
(II) MGA(0): Reserved 12288 kb for textures at offset 0x140
but i just realized that my g400 box still runs with
some
Your depth is 24. 3D depths are only 16bit and 32bit. The Mach64 is
really not powerful enough to handle 32bit (which is what 24 yeilds in
XFree86 4.1). I'm not even sure if the driver supports 32bit depth, but
it's not a good idea anyway. Plus you're going to get better overall
quality
Hi folks,
I'm attempting to incorporate DRI's mesa-4-0-branch into my
current X 4.1.0.1 (Debian sid from X 4_1 branch) setup but am running
into difficulties. I checked out the mesa-4-0-branch and created the build
tree as the DRI compilation guide instructed (which btw is rather
Frank C. Earl wrote:
On Wednesday 24 October 2001 07:17 pm, Carl Busjahn wrote:
Your depth is 24. 3D depths are only 16bit and 32bit. The Mach64 is
really not powerful enough to handle 32bit (which is what 24 yeilds in
XFree86 4.1). I'm not even sure if the driver supports 32bit depth, but
On Wednesday 24 October 2001 01:54 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a=readl(kms-reg_aperture+MACH64_BUS_CNTL);
writel((a | (31) )(~(16)), kms-reg_aperture+MACH64_BUS_CNTL);
same other code
works fine. Now why would this be ?
This could be caused by the same thing
On Wednesday 24 October 2001 11:30 pm, Gareth Hughes wrote:
Hmm, in a day where you can get PC graphics hardware that can run Quake3
at 1600x1200@32 with maximum quality settings at around 100 fps, perhaps
you should reevaluate your idea of powerful enough...
Now, now, not everybody can use
Frank C. Earl wrote:
Now, now, not everybody can use your employer's gear, Gareth... :-
It's not hard to get something rather more powerful than a Rage Pro --
anandtech.com lists current-generation hardware for under $120. One
would guess going back a generation or two would bring the
