[Dri-devel] Re: Mach64

2001-11-20 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Dorin Lazar wrote: >> Sorry to bother you again. I talked with the people from ATI - they said >> that (and I quote) >> >> Hello Dorin. >> >> I noticed in your form you are doing work with Linux. We have provided the >> necessary documents to the Xfree86 and DRI proje

Re: [Xpert]Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Radeon 2D accel very slow when DRIis enabled.

2001-11-20 Thread Ani Joshi
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote: > Well, I've now confirmed that we are not on crack. ;o) People > who claim they're using Radeon with DRI enabled and not having > any 2D slowdowns, are indeed on crack though, as the source code > itself, as well as developers have now confirmed to

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Radeon 2D accel very slow when DRI is enabled.

2001-11-20 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Eric Anholt wrote: >I've had a couple of FreeBSD DRI and Radeon users complain about this too. I >had always chalked it up to some bug in our drivers and I was waiting to get >a Radeon myself to check it out. Well, I've now confirmed that we are not on crack. ;o) People

[Dri-devel] Matrox G450 _PCI_ and Alpha

2001-11-20 Thread Claus-Justus Heine
Hi there, the last days I was amusing myself with finding out about the status of the Matrox G450 _PCI_ w.r.t. to hw 3D support. The card is plugged into an Alpha station (UP2000). I ended up hacking the agpgart module to kind-of emulate an agp chipset by using the iommu of the UP2000 mainboard.

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64

2001-11-20 Thread Gareth Hughes
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 07:18:16PM -0500, Frank C. Earl wrote: > > I don't think there's any more available from ATI than what we already have. > If memory serves, Gareth and John worked from the register docs and the 2D > coding info from the Programmer's guide. Yep, that's correct. Had to

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64

2001-11-20 Thread Frank C . Earl
On Tuesday 20 November 2001 04:36 pm, you wrote: > Having said all that, the docs that I have (and most others I think) don't > really cover 3D operations (except for register listings). I'm not sure > if the DRI project has 3D documentation available for project members. I don't think there's

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Radeon 2D accel very slow when DRI is enabled.

2001-11-20 Thread Eric Anholt
I've had a couple of FreeBSD DRI and Radeon users complain about this too. I had always chalked it up to some bug in our drivers and I was waiting to get a Radeon myself to check it out. On Tuesday 20 November 2001 16:29, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On 20 Nov 2001, Owen Taylor wrote: > >Date: 20

[Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Radeon 2D accel very slow when DRI is enabled.

2001-11-20 Thread Mike A. Harris
On 20 Nov 2001, Owen Taylor wrote: >Date: 20 Nov 2001 09:39:40 -0500 >From: Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Mike A. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: DRI devel list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], > Hui Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Subject: Re

Re: [Dri-devel] r128 & DPMS

2001-11-20 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2001-11-19 at 12:40, M.G. Houtman wrote: > I was wondering, the driver status of the r128 driver says DPMS is supported, > but somehow I can only get the screen blanking to work (works automagically). > Whatever tool I try to use, my screen will never go standby or suspend. Do you hav

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64

2001-11-20 Thread Leif Delgass
All the people actively doing development have gotten docs directly from ATI rather than through the xfree86/DRI project as I understand it. That's how I got them, but I mentioned that I wanted to contribute to xfree/DRI when I signed up with ATI. We've agreed to an NDA by accepting the docs, s

[Dri-devel] mach64 extra help

2001-11-20 Thread Jose Fonseca
Hi mach64 people! I've successfully run glxgears on my laptop and I drew a big smile on my face when the fps were set at 220, compared to the 40 that were before. Thanks to you all guys. Spite of that, I know that there is work to be done, so I'm voluteering to give the help I can. I've just sub

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] >1GB & DRI

2001-11-20 Thread Adam Stewart Edgar
I am im running debian unstable with 1.5 gb main mem, 64mb Radeon ddr with no problems what so ever adam edgar On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 12:36, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Steve Bergman wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm having problems with lockups since I upgraded my memory to > 1GB. I > > have reason

Re: [Dri-devel] >1GB & DRI

2001-11-20 Thread Ronald de Man
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 06:36:35PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Steve Bergman wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm having problems with lockups since I upgraded my memory to > 1GB. I > > have reason to suspect that the location of the SAREA (just above the > > 1GB level) is my problem. Does anyone

[Dri-devel] >1GB & DRI

2001-11-20 Thread Keith Whitwell
Steve Bergman wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm having problems with lockups since I upgraded my memory to > 1GB. I > have reason to suspect that the location of the SAREA (just above the > 1GB level) is my problem. Does anyone know how to change the address > that DRI picks for the SAREA? > I don't kn

[Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Radeon 2D accel very slow when DRI is enabled.

2001-11-20 Thread Owen Taylor
It's a little suprising to me that removing some (fairly unimportant) accelerations makes 2D "painfully slow"; except for a few things like blits and solid area fills, acceleration just doesn't matter much any more. What applications were you testing with? I've seen DRI slow 2D down to a "crawl"

[Dri-devel] r128 & DPMS

2001-11-20 Thread M.G. Houtman
Hi, I was wondering, the driver status of the r128 driver says DPMS is supported, but somehow I can only get the screen blanking to work (works automagically). Whatever tool I try to use, my screen will never go standby or suspend. Anyone else managed in doing this? Regards, -- tinus ___