Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [GATOS]Radeon 7500 3D performance

2002-02-06 Thread Carl Busjahn
Nicholas Charles Leippe wrote: >>Apologies if this is off-topic. >> >>Does anyone here know roughly what kind of DRI performance I could >>expect with a Radeon 7500 using the gatos drivers? I'm thinking of >>replacing my trusty Matrox G400, and have found only scant >>information via Google rega

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [GATOS]Radeon 7500 3D performance

2002-02-06 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:32:38PM -0700, Nicholas Charles Leippe wrote: > it has serious ghosting (8mm @ 1600x1200) artifacts, and if I look > closely at the image, it is not steady--little dots are floating > around. I live with it because it is so much faster, and I use the > video in features

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [GATOS]Radeon 7500 3D performance

2002-02-06 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Nicholas Charles Leippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Apologies if this is off-topic. > > > > Does anyone here know roughly what kind of DRI performance I could > > expect with a Radeon 7500 using the gatos drivers? I'm thinking of > > replacing my trusty Matrox G400, and have found only scan

[Dri-devel] Re: [GATOS]Radeon 7500 3D performance

2002-02-06 Thread Nicholas Charles Leippe
> Apologies if this is off-topic. > > Does anyone here know roughly what kind of DRI performance I could > expect with a Radeon 7500 using the gatos drivers? I'm thinking of > replacing my trusty Matrox G400, and have found only scant > information via Google regarding XFree86 and the 7500. If

Re: [Dri-devel] Patch: mach64 hw cursor bugfix

2002-02-06 Thread Keith Whitwell
José Fonseca wrote: > > I'm not sure if I have CVS permition to directly apply this patch or not > but I decided to go through the proper channels since this is the first > time I'm doing this. > If you have write access, you should go ahead and commit the patch (if you're happy with it). Ke

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Patch: mach64 hw cursor bugfix

2002-02-06 Thread Leif Delgass
On 6 Feb 2002, Jose Fonseca wrote: > Leif, > > On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 10:20, José Fonseca wrote: [snip] > I also have 4.2.0 installed and my mach64 tree works fine with it so, > unless there is an immediate advantage in updating (like improvements in > mesa), I think is better to wait a little

[Dri-devel] Re: Patch: mach64 hw cursor bugfix

2002-02-06 Thread Jose Fonseca
Leif, On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 10:20, José Fonseca wrote: > On 2002.02.06 04:20 Leif Delgass wrote: > I don't have CVS access, but I tried this change and it fixed the > corrupted cursor problem in UT for me. Thanks! BTW, I merged the dri > HEAD into my working tree and it was relatively painless,