Hi,
Thanks for the help my PCI radeon.
I'm now trying to use multiple PCI radeons on a computer, with DRI
hardware acceleration on each of them.
So far, when I plug two radeons in, they show up on the PCI scanbus at
0:9:0 and 0:13:0. I can use the 0:9:0 card, but when I change my
XF86Config
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:18:33 +
Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:08:15 +
> > Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Felix Kühling wrote:
> >>
> > [snip]
> >
> >>Felix, do you have versions of these that apply clea
Brian Paul wrote:
The glheader.h file includes assert.h
I don't know what's causing the error.
-Brian
I moved the #include of assert.h out of the #ifdef XFree86Module
section, and all the compile errors went away.
The only changes I've made on config/cf/host.def file are:
#define DoLoad
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 15:30, Jens Owen wrote:
> There was a discussion today in the weekly DRI developer's meeting
> regarding the cross purposes of pushing the latest DRI infrastructure
> work vs. providing a stable, easy to use set of drivers for our broader
> base of BETA testers.
>
> The co
Jens Owen wrote:
There was a discussion today in the weekly DRI developer's meeting
regarding the cross purposes of pushing the latest DRI infrastructure
work vs. providing a stable, easy to use set of drivers for our broader
base of BETA testers.
I don't have a full log of today's meeting, bu
There was a discussion today in the weekly DRI developer's meeting
regarding the cross purposes of pushing the latest DRI infrastructure
work vs. providing a stable, easy to use set of drivers for our broader
base of BETA testers.
The conclusions reached in this discussion were:
1) The DRI inf
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 06:21:17PM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I still cant use the daily snapshots - I get Sig11's and no display.
>
> Are the snapshots still not glibc2.2 compatible?
>
> I have X 4.2.1 and the latest snapshot. do I need anything else?
Ian,
Can I see a log from /var/lo
Ian Romanick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:43:50PM -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
#dri-devel on irc.openprojects.net
At 5pm EST, 2pm MST. (in about 1:15 from now)
We're off of daylight saving time now in the US so that might mean a
start time one hour later for people elsewhere.
D'oh! I for
Jens Owen wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
This is just a friendly reminder that the weeking dri-devel IRC
meeting will
be starting in the #dri-devel channel on irc.openprojects.net at 2100
UTC (or
5:00PM EDT or 2:00PDT, if you prefer).
Time zone conversion available at:
http://www.timezoneconvert
Ian Romanick wrote:
This is just a friendly reminder that the weeking dri-devel IRC meeting will
be starting in the #dri-devel channel on irc.openprojects.net at 2100 UTC (or
5:00PM EDT or 2:00PDT, if you prefer).
Time zone conversion available at:
http://www.timezoneconverter.com/cgi-bin/tzc.tz
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:43:50PM -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
>
> #dri-devel on irc.openprojects.net
>
> At 5pm EST, 2pm MST. (in about 1:15 from now)
>
> We're off of daylight saving time now in the US so that might mean a
> start time one hour later for people elsewhere.
D'oh! I forgot about
#dri-devel on irc.openprojects.net
At 5pm EST, 2pm MST. (in about 1:15 from now)
We're off of daylight saving time now in the US so that might mean a
start time one hour later for people elsewhere.
-Brian
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 14:53, David D. Hagood wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
#define DoLoadableServer NO
in host.def. I just fixed a bug that would indeed have prevented that
from building though. :)
I don't think it is fixed yet - I just pulled CVS and tried this, and
Ian Romanick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:38:49AM -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
I'm going to be merging the DRI cvs back into the XFree86 very soon.
Anyone have any furthur patches to the DRI cvs before I do this ?
I think I'll bring in my (minor) changes to the radeon
This is just a friendly reminder that the weeking dri-devel IRC meeting will
be starting in the #dri-devel channel on irc.openprojects.net at 2100 UTC (or
5:00PM EDT or 2:00PDT, if you prefer).
Time zone conversion available at:
http://www.timezoneconverter.com/cgi-bin/tzc.tzc
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 14:53, David D. Hagood wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > #define DoLoadableServer NO
> >
> > in host.def. I just fixed a bug that would indeed have prevented that
> > from building though. :)
> >
> >
> I don't think it is fixed yet - I just pulled CVS and tried this
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:46:56AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
> Ian Romanick wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:06:13AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
> >>Would disabling the DRI when backingstore is enabled give the semantic
> >>consistency you're looking for? I don't have a problem with that,
> >>bec
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:38:49AM -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > I'm going to be merging the DRI cvs back into the XFree86 very soon.
> >
> > Anyone have any furthur patches to the DRI cvs before I do this ?
>
> I think I'll bring in my (minor) changes to the radeon kernel
Brian Paul wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
I'm going to be merging the DRI cvs back into the XFree86 very soon.
Anyone have any furthur patches to the DRI cvs before I do this ?
I think I'll bring in my (minor) changes to the radeon kernel module from
the mesa-4.1 branch. This might save peopl
Alan Hourihane wrote:
I'm going to be merging the DRI cvs back into the XFree86 very soon.
Anyone have any furthur patches to the DRI cvs before I do this ?
I think I'll bring in my (minor) changes to the radeon kernel module from
the mesa-4.1 branch. This might save people from having to upgr
I'm going to be merging the DRI cvs back into the XFree86 very soon.
Anyone have any furthur patches to the DRI cvs before I do this ?
Alan.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
__
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 17:16, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
> > Memory can only ever increase for processes which do memory allocation
> > using brk() - there is no way to return such memory to the OS.
> >
> > -d
>
> "no way to return such memory to the OS"
>
> IMO that constitutes a leak. It is in ef
On Sunday 27 October 2002 03:58 pm, you wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had my Xserver running for about 24 hours straight and noticed that it
> > was using about 220M virtual memory. Even after closing all clients and
> > logging out the memory usage didn't drop significantly. Aft
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:08:15 +
Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
[snip]
> Felix, do you have versions of these that apply cleanly to the trunk? R200
> in particular.
I suppose the applied cleanly two weeks ago ;) New versions are attached.
>
> Keiht
>
Fel
Michel Dänzer wrote:
#define DoLoadableServer NO
in host.def. I just fixed a bug that would indeed have prevented that
from building though. :)
I don't think it is fixed yet - I just pulled CVS and tried this, and I
get the following error:
gcc -o XFree86 -O3 -ansi -Wall -Wpointer-arith -
Michel Dänzer wrote:
http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/radeon-pageflip.diff
is an attempt to fix the following pageflipping issues:
* the 2D driver clobbers the CRTC{,2}_OFFSET_CNTL registers when
switching modes; as a consequence, flips only take place on the
next vertical blan
Felix Kühling wrote:
Hi,
here is a new set of frame throttling patches for the radeon and r200
drivers. It implements a second chance strategy to avoid "ping-ponging"
between busy waiting and IRQ waiting with very high frame rates.
Felix, do you have versions of these that apply cleanly to the
27 matches
Mail list logo
