Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Problem with latest trunk and i810?

2003-07-09 Thread Dave Airlie
> > > > Looks like David has already ported & applied it to XFree86. > > yeah but I'm hanging on bug 484 to make sure he is correct.. read 484, > David believes there is a drm/driver issue... I'm not 100% convinced it > is that important, of course he does know better than me :-), so I'll > apply h

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Radeon Driver issue? (OpenGL + newradeon_drv.o)

2003-07-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 17:30, Alex Deucher wrote: > --- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 16:03, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > > > I haven't been able to test mergedfb with a 3D context of 2048x2048 > > or > > > larger since my m6 only has 8 mb of ram. > > > > You cou

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Radeon Driver issue? (OpenGL + new radeon_drv.o)

2003-07-09 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Michel D�nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 16:03, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > I haven't been able to test mergedfb with a 3D context of 2048x2048 > or > > larger since my m6 only has 8 mb of ram. > > You could try with just the horizontal or vertical virtual resolutio

Re: [Dri-devel] radeon 9200 tester available

2003-07-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 14:11, Martin Spott wrote: > Rupert Levene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:07:28AM +0200, Michel Dnzer wrote: > > >> PS: http://levene.dyndns.org/invisible-text/normal.png does show a > >> driver problem - the lighting is wrong with HW TCL - but you

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Radeon Driver issue? (OpenGL + newradeon_drv.o)

2003-07-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 16:03, Alex Deucher wrote: > --- Richard F Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> So I guess my next questions are: 1) is the 2048x2048 a HW > > >> limitation, or a SW/implementation limitation > > > > > > AFAIK the maximum size of the GL context is a hardware issue. >

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Radeon Driver issue? (OpenGL + new radeon_drv.o)

2003-07-09 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Richard F Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> So I guess my next questions are: 1) is the 2048x2048 a HW > >> limitation, or a SW/implementation limitation > > > > AFAIK the maximum size of the GL context is a hardware issue. > However, > > it shouldn't matter where it is displayed, tha

Re: [Dri-devel] radeon 9200 tester available

2003-07-09 Thread Martin Spott
Rupert Levene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:07:28AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> PS: http://levene.dyndns.org/invisible-text/normal.png does show a >> driver problem - the lighting is wrong with HW TCL - but you didn't >> report that... ;) > Well I'd assumed that _this

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Problem with latest trunk and i810?

2003-07-09 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > > if no-one screams I'll apply it tomorrow... > > Looks like David has already ported & applied it to XFree86. yeah but I'm hanging on bug 484 to make sure he is correct.. read 484, David believes there is a drm/driver issue... I'm not 100% convinced

Re: [Dri-devel] radeon 9200 tester available

2003-07-09 Thread Rupert Levene
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:07:28AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 12:57, Rupert Levene wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:19:09PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 21:05, Rupert Levene wrote: > > > > > > > > 2. In noegnud, if there is text in a window

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Radeon Driver issue? (OpenGL + new radeon_drv.o)

2003-07-09 Thread Richard F Weber
Roland Scheidegger wrote: Richard F Weber wrote: Roland Scheidegger wrote: You are correct, the radeon 7x00 (and also the 8500/9100/9000/9200) have a maximum opengl context size of 2048x2048. This was mentioned briefly in some windows reviews I've seen. You can get this information from ATI

[Dri-devel] Your buglist for The XFree86 Project's Bugzilla needs attention.

2003-07-09 Thread bugadmin
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require attention. All of these bugs are in the NEW state, and have not been touched in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at th

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Problem with latest trunk and i810? (fwd)

2003-07-09 Thread Dave Airlie
sent this from wrong address.. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / [EMAIL PROTECTED] pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 08:56:17 +0100 (IST) From: Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach 64 DMA work.

2003-07-09 Thread José Fonseca
James, On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:57:53PM -0700, James Jones wrote: > I was just wondering how the new DMA code Jose was working on for the > mach64 driver is going. I've been doing the necessary architectural changes on the newdrm-0-0-1-branch. The most important stuff - allocationg and manag

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Problem with latest trunk and i810?

2003-07-09 Thread Keith Whitwell
Dave Airlie wrote: Yes, that would be cleaner. patch for not only the i810 but also the fixes for radoen/r128/mga drivers, along with the changes to xf86drm.[ch] ... http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied/patches/dri/agp_drm.diff I think XFree86 tree is going to need something along these lines also, but