Re: [Dri-devel] Re: any DRM update scheduled for 2.4.23-pre?

2003-08-11 Thread Ian Romanick
Marcelo Tosatti wrote: Does DRM 4.3 work with both XFree 4.2 and 4.3 ? I dont so, right? Unless somebody screwed up it should. If it is broken, we would, of course, like to hear about it. :) --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free

Re: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] per-screen client-side glx extensions

2003-08-11 Thread Keith Whitwell
Ian Romanick wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: I'm also having second thoughts about allowing drivers to add function calls to the GLX dispatch table. This is a global table that has no way to identify the owner of a dispatch function. This functionality is currently only used by a single feature

[Dri-devel] Re: Build strangeness

2003-08-11 Thread Nathan Gray
Ian Romanick wrote: Nathan Gray wrote: Hello, I'm trying to build from CVS but I'm seeing something unexpected. The build is trying to link to X libraries outside of the DRI tree itself. In host.def I altered the ProjectRoot variable as so: /* Optionally turn this on to change the

Re: [Dri-devel] Two Linux framebuffer patches, Radeon and Rage128

2003-08-11 Thread Ian Romanick
Jon Smirl wrote: These add all known Radeon and Rage128 PCI IDs to their respective framebuffer drivers. It also updates linux/pci_ids.h with these IDs. Both drivers will display pretty_name if CONFIG_PCI_NAMES is enabled, otherwise a name is generated. Please check over the chip family

[Dri-devel] [Bug 62] RFE: Add support for DRI with Xinerama configurations

2003-08-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |dri- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional

[Dri-devel] Simple example fails w/direct rendering

2003-08-11 Thread Nathan Gray
Hello, This is an example from an opengl tutorial that I'm trying out. If I run it with LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT it works fine, but with direct rendering I just get a blank window. I'm using the radeon driver from recent CVS (checked out yesterday anonymously) on a Dell Inspiron 4150 w/Radeon

[Dri-devel] Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle fixes for drm_agpsupport

2003-08-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
Larry McVoy wrote: That ought to be balanced with don't screw up the revision history, people use it. It's one thing to reformat code that is unreadable, for the most part this code didn't come close to unreadable. Granted. I wasn't suggesting that. I was saying if (expr) statement; // OK

[Dri-devel] [Bug 25] radeon_vtxfmt.c:1057: radeonVtxfmtUnbindContext: Assertion `vb.context == ctx' failed.

2003-08-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |dri- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional

[Dri-devel] i810 compatibility fix upgraded to latest tree..

2003-08-11 Thread Dave Airlie
Okay I've updated Matthew's DRM compatibility fix for the top of DRI tree, http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied/patches/dri/i810_compat.diff I'll apply it in a couple of days as it seemed to be agreed previously that it solves the problem.. Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer

[Dri-devel] [Bug 131] Metabug - Mach64 DRI is not merged into the [DRI] trunk.

2003-08-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-08

[Dri-devel] Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle fixes for drm_agpsupport

2003-08-11 Thread Larry McVoy
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:53:17PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Larry McVoy wrote: are function calls at a 10-nanosecond glance. Also, having two styles of 'if' formatting in your example just screams inconsistent to me :) It is inconsistent, on purpose. It's essentially like perl's