Re: [Dri-devel] Linux libGL ABI question

2003-08-26 Thread Ian Romanick
Brian Paul wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: Brian Paul wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: Currently, the only functions that are aliased like this are both GLX_SGI_make_current_read functions, a few GLX_SGIX_fbconfig functions, and glXGetCurrentDisplayEXT (from GLX_EXT_import_context and GLX 1.2). Since t

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Strange TLB flush in DRM

2003-08-26 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 19:11, David Mosberger wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:58:55 +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > said: > > Benjamin> flush_tlb_kernel_range((unsigned long) addr, (unsigned long) addr + > size); > > Benjamin> Why this flush ? I don't see why

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Re: something changed in r200 driver?

2003-08-26 Thread Ian Romanick
Korosi Akos wrote: Section "Device" Identifier "Videocard0" Driver "radeon" VideoRam131072 Option "AGPMode""4" #Option "AGPSize""128" # === disable PnP Monitor === #Option "NoDDC" # === disabl

[Dri-devel] VSync configuration issues

2003-08-26 Thread Felix Kühling
Hi, I tried to puzzle this together from my (vague) memory of the IRC discussion with Ian about this topic and my own thoughts. Here is the result: Synchronization with vertical refresh (swap intervals): - Never, FPS rulez! - Application preference, default interval 0 - Application preference, de

RE: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.22-rc2 unresolved symbols in drm/sis.o when CONFIG_AGP=m

2003-08-26 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 09:12, Alexander Stohr wrote: > why wont the module compilation still pass > when SIS fb configuration flags from the > Linux kernel configuration are missing? > > sorry if that requirement is already > mentioned in the readme. i am just wondering. The SiS DRM uses sisfb to

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Re: something changed in r200 driver?

2003-08-26 Thread Korosi Akos
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 10:12, Korosi Akos wrote: > > > > Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ă­rta: > > > > The latest working snapshot is r200-20030819. > > The XFree86 log of the latest working snapshot is at the end > > of this mail > > (so you can se

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-08-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-26-08 15:50 --- No u will use #540 if u wan

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-08-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-26-08 15:38 --- So I should apply patch #54

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-08-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-26-08 15:10 --- Jist for information. After

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-08-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-26-08 15:08 --- Created an attachment (id=5

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-08-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-26-08 15:04 --- Created an attachment (id=5

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-08-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-26-08 15:02 --- Kevin . Please remember tha

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch:config-0-0-1-branch)

2003-08-26 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 03:46, Felix Kühling wrote: > On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:58:41 -0700 > Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 17:45, Eric Anholt wrote: > > > CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri > > > Module name: xc > > > Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/common/ >

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-08-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-26-08 14:38 --- sonic kernel # make -f Make

[Dri-devel] Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Question about glcore.h

2003-08-26 Thread Brian Paul
Ian Romanick wrote: I have a question about the __GLcontextModesRec structure in glcore.h. Is it safe to extend that structure? I'd like to extend it to have the additional fields that are in __GLXFBConfigRec (from DRI's include/GL/glxint.h). If that were done, I could remove __GLXFBConfigRec

Re: [Dri-devel] 'GLX_ARB_get_proc_address' missing in 'glxinfo' with latest DRI ?

2003-08-26 Thread Lionel Ulmer
> For nearly all extensions, this is a good idea. On XFree86 based > platforms (Linux, the various BSDs, etc.) it is safe to assume that > GLX_ARB_get_proc_address is supported. You may want to have an option > to override checking for that particular extension. Well, I got for now only two b

[Dri-devel] Question about glcore.h

2003-08-26 Thread Ian Romanick
I have a question about the __GLcontextModesRec structure in glcore.h. Is it safe to extend that structure? I'd like to extend it to have the additional fields that are in __GLXFBConfigRec (from DRI's include/GL/glxint.h). If that were done, I could remove __GLXFBConfigRec entirely. However,

[Dri-devel] Re: Strange TLB flush in DRM

2003-08-26 Thread David Mosberger
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:58:55 +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Benjamin> flush_tlb_kernel_range((unsigned long) addr, (unsigned long) addr + size); Benjamin> Why this flush ? I don't see why one would need to flush Benjamin> TLBs on a region obtained from

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon PCI roundup

2003-08-26 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 23:19, Andreas Stenglein wrote: > > I looked at pciids.sf.net and found something interesting: > there are really many cards with bit 0 set in the subdevice, > also mobility chips. When you look for the spec of such laptops, > (thinkpad a30p for example) they claim to have

[Dri-devel] Strange TLB flush in DRM

2003-08-26 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Hi David ! In the recent DRMs, there is this code in agp_remap: phys_addr_map = agpmem->memory->memory + (offset - agpmem->bound) / PAGE_SIZE; for (i = 0; i < num_pages; ++i) page_map[i] = pfn_to_page(phys_addr_map[i] >> PAGE_SHIFT); addr = vmap(page_map, n

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI

2003-08-26 Thread Alex Deucher
there are docs for the 300 series on utah-glx, but they are 2D only it looks like: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=1098&release_id=77440 Alex --- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As some of you have heard, I'm working on getting the SiS DRI working > again. It's bee

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI

2003-08-26 Thread Alex Deucher
There are no sis docs available for any thing newer than the 6326 as far as I know (the 6326 docs were on the dri downloads page for a while). There is also a utah-glx driver for the 6326. Sis wrote the DRI driver for the 300 series, but I don't think they ever released databooks for it. They ha

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Re: something changed in r200 driver?

2003-08-26 Thread Korosi Akos
Hi all! So now I provide more information about the problem. Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> írta: > Indeed, but the X config and log files might also be useful, as well as > the last snapshot that worked. I provide uname -a for any case: Linux localhost.localdomain 2.4.22-pre5 #1 Wed Jul 30 2

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-08-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-26-08 04:58 --- No, everything successfully

Re: [Dri-devel] Existing OpenGL based window manager

2003-08-26 Thread Jon Smirl
--- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd be interested in this project. I beleive there was a project a > Also, speaking of pbuffers, Alan Cox mentioned that he a received a > code drop from via that had pbuffer support for savage and maybe > CLE266. did that ever make it into CVS? I'd

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: config-0-0-1-branch)

2003-08-26 Thread Felix Kühling
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:58:41 -0700 Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 17:45, Eric Anholt wrote: > > CVSROOT:/cvsroot/dri > > Module name:xc > > Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/common/ > > Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/08/25 17:45:05 > > > > L

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon 9200 and XFree 4.2.1

2003-08-26 Thread Ian Romanick
Michael Knigge wrote: All, I have some trouble with my new ATI 9200 - I can't get it working with my Xfree86 4.2.1. I've compiled this Xfree by myself for Debian woody. So... is it somehow possible to get Xfree 4.2.1 working with this card? Maybe with a special CVS-Checkout with a dri version t

[Dri-devel] SiS DRI

2003-08-26 Thread Eric Anholt
As some of you have heard, I'm working on getting the SiS DRI working again. It's been quite a lot of work, particularly given my lack of knowledge about OpenGL or the structure of the client drivers. However, I am to the point where I can run several mesa demos (gears, fire, tunnel, multiarb, sp

[Dri-devel] Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.

2003-08-26 Thread bugadmin
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.] You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require attention

Re: [Dri-devel] Existing OpenGL based window manager

2003-08-26 Thread Ian Romanick
Alex Deucher wrote: I'd be interested in this project. I beleive there was a project a while back that did something like this using xnest. it was called transluxent and was kind of a hack. http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~unk6/transluxent/ Also, speaking of pbuffers, Alan Cox mentioned that he

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon 9200 and XFree 4.2.1

2003-08-26 Thread Jacek Popławski
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:36:03AM +, Michael Knigge wrote: > I have some trouble with my new ATI 9200 - I can't get it working with > my Xfree86 4.2.1. I've compiled this Xfree by myself for Debian woody. Do you feel any discomfort when using XFree86 never than 4.2.1? -- Free Software - fi

Re: [Dri-devel] 'GLX_ARB_get_proc_address' missing in 'glxinfo' withlatest DRI ?

2003-08-26 Thread Ian Romanick
Lionel Ulmer wrote: I got a bug report from an user telling that the latest upgrade to Wine broke HalfLife on his box (using Gentoo Linux). The problem is that I changed the Wine code to be pedantic and to check the presence of all extensions before using them EVEN for glXGetProcAddressARB (even i

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: config-0-0-1-branch)

2003-08-26 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 17:45, Eric Anholt wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri > Module name: xc > Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/common/ > Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/08/25 17:45:05 > > Log message: > Fix config-0-0-1-branch on FreeBSD: expat is located in /usr/local, so we