Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-04 Thread Keith Whitwell
Eric Anholt wrote: On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 03:55, Felix Kühling wrote: On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 17:04:59 -0700 Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:46, Keith Whitwell wrote: Thomas Emmel wrote: On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote: Thomas Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED

[Dri-devel] SiS DRI update

2003-09-04 Thread Eric Anholt
My current diff is at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-15.diff Fixed the DeleteTexture problem (which was seen in glxinfo and tuxracer in the form of segfaults) with a workaround. In the radeon and r128 drivers there's: /* free the Mesa context */ rmesa->glCtx->DriverC

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-04 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 20:45, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:06, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Eric Anholt wrote: > > > On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > > > >>Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: > > >> > > >>>My current diff is at: > > >

Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-04 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 03:55, Felix Kühling wrote: > On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 17:04:59 -0700 > Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:46, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > Thomas Emmel wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote: > > > > > > > >>Thomas Emmel

Re: Snapshots, was Re: [Dri-devel] Problems with MOHAA spearhead under wine on ATI 128.

2003-09-04 Thread Felix Kühling
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:39:48 +0100 José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:27:01PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Ian Romanick wrote: > > >Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > > > >>Ian Romanick wrote: > > >> > > >>>Who is building the binary snapshots these days? > > I am.

Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-04 Thread Felix Kühling
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 17:04:59 -0700 Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:46, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Thomas Emmel wrote: > > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote: > > > > > >>Thomas Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>>and this message m

Re: [Dri-devel] New gatos API: Crashes with radeon on driverchange.

2003-09-04 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 02:18, Mike Mestnik wrote: > --- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 18:27, Mike Mestnik wrote: > > > --- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 18:43, Mike Mestnik wrote: > > > > > I have something to add to this.

Re: [Dri-devel] Testing the S3 DRI driver...

2003-09-04 Thread Maximo
Giustiniano, The savage driver is not working yet. What driver are you using? bye. At 07:16 AM 4/9/2003, you wrote: After building and successfully inserting the savage.o driver, I've tried to play Warcraft III under linux using winex 3.30: the game starts (according to the sounds I hea

[Dri-devel] Re: Snapshots

2003-09-04 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 10:39, José Fonseca wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:27:01PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > I'm OK with distributing libGL.so under that rationale. > > Done. It will affect binary snapshots built from now onwards. BTW, have you added atimisc_drv.o to the r200, radeon

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [OT] Sourceforge CVS

2003-09-04 Thread Keith Whitwell
Keith Whitwell wrote: Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: And as of this morning, I'm still getting stalled on locks on the *exact* same file as yesterday morning. This is one of those cvs problems people talk about. You have to report the file to the SF admins via the website and they'll go & manually r

[Dri-devel] Testing the S3 DRI driver...

2003-09-04 Thread Giustiniano
After building and successfully inserting the savage.o driver, I've tried to play Warcraft III under linux using winex 3.30: the game starts (according to the sounds I hear) but there's nothing on the screen: if I unload the driver the game start (and is painfully slow, because of the lack of

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-09-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-09 05:57 --- http://www.xfree86.org/deve

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [OT] Sourceforge CVS

2003-09-04 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Can someone post the URL for the page where that can be reported? I didn't see any link on the sourceforge homepage, and doing a search on their site for CVS is pretty pointless :-) Adam On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > > And as of this morning, I'm still g

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [OT] Sourceforge CVS

2003-09-04 Thread Keith Whitwell
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: And as of this morning, I'm still getting stalled on locks on the *exact* same file as yesterday morning. This is one of those cvs problems people talk about. You have to report the file to the SF admins via the website and they'll go & manually remove the lock. They're

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [OT] Sourceforge CVS

2003-09-04 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
And as of this morning, I'm still getting stalled on locks on the *exact* same file as yesterday morning. Adam On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > > Well, earlier today (after about 5 days of absolutely *no* luck with the > sourceforge CVS servers), I managed to pull the entire source

Re: Snapshots, was Re: [Dri-devel] Problems with MOHAA spearhead under wine on ATI 128.

2003-09-04 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:27:01PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Ian Romanick wrote: > >Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > >>Ian Romanick wrote: > >> > >>>Who is building the binary snapshots these days? I am. > >>>We need to start > >>>(and should have started a long time ago) including libGL.so in

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Sourceforge CVS

2003-09-04 Thread Keith Whitwell
Mike A. Harris wrote: On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote: Havoc, your comment on pserver being like telnet isn't really applicable, anon only pserver is as secure as any anon only service, I wouldn't even think about using non-anon pserver but I don't think DRI will ever need such a thing..

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Sourceforge CVS

2003-09-04 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote: >> >>Havoc, your comment on pserver being like telnet isn't really applicable, >> >>anon only pserver is as secure as any anon only service, I wouldn't even >> >>think about using non-anon pserver but I don't think DRI will ever need >> >>such a thing.. >>

Re: [Dri-devel] New gatos API: Crashes with radeon on driver change.

2003-09-04 Thread Keith Whitwell
Mike Mestnik wrote: --- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 18:27, Mike Mestnik wrote: --- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 18:43, Mike Mestnik wrote: I have something to add to this. Recently I tested gatos drivers going from dri to gat