--- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I recall, no. As it is now, only a single instance of Xfree86 can
> use the DRI. I think it might be possible by adapting the resume code
> to reinitialize state and agp on a VT switch, however, I may be wrong.
>
> Alex
Am I right in thinking tha
As I recall, no. As it is now, only a single instance of Xfree86 can
use the DRI. I think it might be possible by adapting the resume code
to reinitialize state and agp on a VT switch, however, I may be wrong.
Alex
--- Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I am running two copies of Xfree/D
If I am running two copies of Xfree/DRI on different VT's and both are using
the same hardware, is 3D state maintained on VT switch? Including all of the
texture memory?
=
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved pro
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-14-10 22:03 ---
Someone (sincere appol
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Standalone Mesa doesn't have the Xfree code for walking the PCI bus so the
simplest way for me to find the hardware is to make the DRI drivers aware of
the OS's PCI probing support. I've already have PCI probing support added to
all of the DRI drivers, but I need to come up with an API that won't b
Risenhoover, Paul wrote:
I've been trying to get DRI working on an ATI Mach64. It's running
RedHat 8.0 and I just used up2date to ensure I got all new code, plus
the new kernel. I've attached all the obligatory files for your review.
There's no "official" 3D driver for that card. There is an
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 10:38, Alex Deucher wrote:
> what's the difference between the two? why does linux have it's own
> version? why couldn't the linux version be used with BSD? something to
> do with the kernel?
Yes. The linux-specific module uses the vm86 support of linux to do the
int10 exe
--- Roland Scheidegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
> > Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>I just committed a major rework of mergedfb to CVS. almost all of
> the
> >>code is now in radeon_mergedfb.c/h. I also committed Hui's latest
> code
> >>drop from xfree86
Martin Spott wrote:
Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just committed a major rework of mergedfb to CVS. almost all of the
code is now in radeon_mergedfb.c/h. I also committed Hui's latest code
drop from xfree86 CVS. Let me know if anyone has any problems.
I'm fine with running the 'new
what's the difference between the two? why does linux have it's own
version? why couldn't the linux version be used with BSD? something to
do with the kernel?
Alex
--- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 09:14, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> If the mode validation interacts
Dave Airlie wrote:
I've noticed an issue with the i810 chipset that I'm wondering if anyone
can shed light on it..
I've it narrowed down to the fact that the texture upload code never gets
called for my texture, so the card doesn't know what to display, hence it
displays white space.
To repeat - ge
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=791
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 18:14, Alex Deucher wrote:
> it seems to crash while validaing the modes on the second head. I
> don't know why it should work on linux but not freebsd.
Maybe your code makes assumptions which are true on Linux but false on
FreeBSD, e.g. something related to memory allocatio
Felix Kühling wrote:
Some quick googling shows this looks like it's some compatibility
problem with expat. Currently, I have installed expat 1.95.4 (SuSE 8.1,
gcc 3.2).
Am I just supposed to upgrade expat? That's no problem, but aren't all
those expat 1.95.x releases supposed to be source (and
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 04:25:23 +0200
Roland Scheidegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cvs trunk will no longer compile for me:
>
> gcc ... xmlconfig.c
> xmlconfig.c:268:29: warning: ISO C does not permit named variadic macros
> xmlconfig.c:280:27: warning: ISO C does not permit named variadic macros
16 matches
Mail list logo
