Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-31-10 04:25 ---
What are you talking
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 01:54, Ronny V. Vindenes wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 00:43, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Ronny V. Vindenes wrote:
Something in the last week or two broke the r200 driver. After I cvs
update'ed and recompiled yesterday, I get this error:
(EE) RADEON(0):
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-31-10 07:35 ---
Fine, I misread your
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-31-10 07:51 ---
The package from
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-31-10 09:14 ---
Since I've time to
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-31-10 09:35 ---
The most simple way
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:47:36 -0800
Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:07:33PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
manu wrote:
Responding to myself : sorry it seems that the problem is because the
r200_dri.so module is linked against
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 14:45, Felix Kühling wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:47:36 -0800
Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:07:33PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
manu wrote:
Responding to myself : sorry it seems that the problem is
I have an old S3 M7 dual head card that I would like to port my
portrait code onto for XF86 for a hardware accelerated portrait dual
display system. I used to write drivers for the M7 and I am familiar
with the part but I am lacking documentation on it, this part is old so
is there still
test8 had broken detection for this agp chipset. You have to edit a
file in the x86_64 arch directory to get it to allow more than 0
(assuming you configed for uniprocessor) bridges to be used, as it
checks a variable after incrementing rather than before. I also found
the check wasn't even
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-31-10 22:49 ---
I don't see a large
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:07:33PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
manu wrote:
Le 30.10.2003 17:07:54, manu a écrit :
So I ran glxinfo see below which told me that Direct Rendering is not
enabled! This is crazy as you can check in the XFree log (file
attached).
Hope someone can tell me
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:07:33PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
manu wrote:
Responding to myself : sorry it seems that the problem is because the
r200_dri.so module is linked against libexpat.so.1 which is not on my
system. So I just made a link to the one I had and all is
I was pretty sure that the snapshots did staticly link with libexpat.a.
I remember there being some discussion about this. Once XFree86 4.4.0
hits the streets this particular problem will be moot. AFAIK, XFree86
4.4.0 will include libexpat. However, I still think that the default
should
15 matches
Mail list logo
