On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 08:17:52 +0200
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Additional info, this shows up in the XFree86.0.log file:
> (II) SAVAGE(0): [drm] Could not create dummy context
Could you try restoring your distro's original
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libdri.a. If that works
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 20:27:39 -0700
Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
> > Anyone working on the "t_vertex" conversion for radeon (r200)?
> > Then Andreas could do his TMU3 work, again. Which could help with Viewperf.
>
> I started looking at this today. I decided t
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 12:12:23PM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote:
>
> The t_vertex stuff replaces t_dd_vbtmp stuff. I've done this for the
> savage driver and it was pretty straight forward.
I have mga converted. The conversion was quite easy to do. I haven't
commited it because wanted to see if I
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> I think this fixed it. It looks like the driver wasn't getting linked
> to
> the shader files after the mesa code shuffle.
>
> It seems like all the problems were caused by make files after the
> mesa
> upgrade but just in case I've laid out all of my
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I think you're right Alex. This is what I think happened. I noticed
> that
> > when the various Imakefile and Imakefile.inc were updated with
> regards to
> > the file shuffle from the latest mesa update they were only
> committed to
> > head. They weren't adde
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=512
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-07 16:15 ---
Looks like the so
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-07 18:02 ---
Michel Dänzer, I
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=512
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-07 19:28 ---
OK, here's what I
> >
>
> Is anyone against just including mach64 in the trunk? I know it' still
> unsecure and unstable, but so is savage and that's in the trunk. We
> don't have to build it by default. plus it would avoid having to
> update the makefiles on the branch everytime mesa changes and the trunk
> gets
Felix Kühling wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 20:27:39 -0700
Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dieter Nützel wrote:
Anyone working on the "t_vertex" conversion for radeon (r200)?
Then Andreas could do his TMU3 work, again. Which could help with Viewperf.
I started looking at this today. I decide
--- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Is anyone against just including mach64 in the trunk? I know it'
> still
> > unsecure and unstable, but so is savage and that's in the trunk.
> We
> > don't have to build it by default. plus it would avoid having to
> > update the makefil
12 matches
Mail list logo
