Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 21:09 ---
As should b
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Barry Scott wrote:
I have failed to find a tar ball of CVS tag that names any
specific version of DRM. What did I miss?
Normally, the latest version of DRM distributed with linux kernel source
should be enough.
Why are you looking for 1.5 ? (Also note that different drivers ha
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1461
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 16:06 ---
I just fini
I checked in what I think is a working version for the DRM core split.
It is in two directories drm/linux-core and drm/shared-core.
I accidentally stomped drm/shared during the check-in but I have fixed
it. I checked builds on linux-2.4, linux and linux-core.
I will be gone for about four hours b
On Monday 27 September 2004 19:00, Barry Scott wrote:
> I have failed to find a tar ball of CVS tag that names any
> specific version of DRM. What did I miss?
To my knowledge, there is no global DRM version like this. Each driver has
an interface version number, but this number does not necessari
