One question about tiling, will this cause any problems with the current r300
code? Or is it
something completely unrelated?
Well, Aapo has ported the patch and it worked on his computer - so it is
unlikely to cause problems. If it does we are still better off finding and
fixing the issue.
Hopefully, the updated drm will allow me to stay in X for a while
without encountering the
"WaitForSomething(): select: errno=22" error I was having with the
current drm.
One question about tiling, will this cause any problems with the current
r300 code? Or is it
something completely unrelated?
t
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:38:05 +1100, Ben Skeggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> > [snip]
> >Thus, could everyone with changing they have not committed yet to
> > *DRM* driver but plan to please let me know ? Also any comments,
> > reservations, etc.
> >
> >One rea
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
[snip]
Thus, could everyone with changing they have not committed yet to
*DRM* driver but plan to please let me know ? Also any comments,
reservations, etc.
One reason I am so eager for this is that there have been quite a
few fixes to the DRM driver, including t
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2241
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
Summary: quad strips are drawn in the wrong order on tcl-capable
Ok. I said that this bug doesnt exist and it was just my problem ...
I changed my mind as it appeared again after rebuilding just about
everything and tracked it down after long battle. This was caused by
missing curly braces around texcoord VAP input configuration and resulted
in all 8 texture uni
Hi all,
Aapo Tahkola has made a merge of our current DRM driver and latest DRM
driver from freedesktop.org.
He asked me to commit this to R300 CVS (his Internet connection is a
bit slow for this) and I would like to do it. There will be quite a few
changes as the freedesktop.org + Aapo's
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
On Sunday 27 February 2005 23:10, Hamie wrote:
I've added in the pci-id's for the Saphire 9600 AGP card. As it has 2
pci-id's, I've added both to the pciids file, and added it into
radeon_screen, but left the seocnd head commented out on radeon-screen.c
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2241
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Sunday 27 February 2005 23:10, Hamie wrote:
> I've added in the pci-id's for the Saphire 9600 AGP card. As it has 2
> pci-id's, I've added both to the pciids file, and added it into
> radeon_screen, but left the seocnd head commented out on radeon-screen.c
> as I'm unsiure whether or not it s
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2241
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Hi,
I am running the Linuxconsole.sf.net multiconsole extension
on my machine and I have a Radeon 9200SE/AGP8x and a PCI Radeon7000VE.
Both cards are driven hardware accelerated with DRI.
I noticed behaviour differences running Tuxracer/PPracer between
the two cards.
E.g. on the Radeon 7000VE, the
I've added in the pci-id's for the Saphire 9600 AGP card. As it has 2
pci-id's, I've added both to the pciids file, and added it into
radeon_screen, but left the seocnd head commented out on radeon-screen.c
as I'm unsiure whether or not it should be treeated separately...
Why does it appear as
14 matches
Mail list logo
