Re: CVS Update: drm (branch: trunk)

2005-03-29 Thread Thomas Hellström
Adam Jackson wrote: On Monday 28 March 2005 16:21, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: CVSROOT: /cvs/dri Module name: drm Repository: drm/shared-core/ Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/03/28 13:21:42 Log message: Via updates: * New PCI command parser. Moved from via_dma.c to

[Bug 2848] New: No targets specified and no makefile found

2005-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2848 Summary: No targets specified and no makefile found Product:

[Bug 2849] New: No targets specified and no makefile found

2005-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2849 Summary: No targets specified and no makefile found Product:

[Bug 2848] No targets specified and no makefile found

2005-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2848 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2849] No targets specified and no makefile found

2005-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2849 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-29 04:38 --- ***

Re: [r200] Mesa CVS changes after 23.05 broke direct rendering (shader)

2005-03-29 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Montag, 28. Mrz 2005 20:03 schrieb Dieter Ntzel: Happy Easter! -Dieter This one helps http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=6901710forum_id=5154 -Dieter --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest

[Bug 2849] No targets specified and no makefile found

2005-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2849 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2851] New: mach64_drm.h: No such file or directory

2005-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2851 Summary: mach64_drm.h: No such file or directory Product: Mesa

Re: [r300] what about *BSD?

2005-03-29 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Monday 28 March 2005 03:22 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Saturday 26 March 2005 07:03 am, Jerome Glisse wrote: Wait, I have one thing that's not from CVS. I patched system compiler from GCC 3.4.2 to GCC 3.4.4 snapshot (20050318). I updated GCC because I found some nasty optimization

[Bug 2851] mach64_drm.h: No such file or directory

2005-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2851 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-29 10:25 --- are

[Bug 2852] Bug when I enable DRI, xfree86 take 100% CPU

2005-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2852 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-29 11:04 ---

[Bug 2852] Bug when I enable DRI, xfree86 take 100% CPU

2005-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2852 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-29 11:04 ---

[Bug 2852] Bug when I enable DRI, xfree86 take 100% CPU

2005-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2852 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-29 11:05 ---

[Bug 2852] Bug when I enable DRI, xfree86 take 100% CPU

2005-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2852 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-29 11:13 ---

oopses upon loading or removing via

2005-03-29 Thread Benno Schulenberg
Hi list, Using CVS of today (and of the past few weeks I can't get the via module to work, it doesn't do anything, and it oopses either when loaded or removed. After booting, with agpgart as a module: # modprobe -v via insmod /lib/modules/2.6.11/kernel/drivers/char/agp/agpgart.ko insmod

Re: oopses upon loading or removing via

2005-03-29 Thread Thomas Hellström
Hi! Benno Schulenberg wrote: Hi list, Using CVS of today (and of the past few weeks I can't get the via module to work, it doesn't do anything, and it oopses either when loaded or removed. After booting, with agpgart as a module: # modprobe -v via insmod

Re: [r300] building on ppc?

2005-03-29 Thread Johannes Berg
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 13:49 +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote: Same as for PC (so see readme in r300 for detailed steps) but you must use lastest Xorg CVS (head). I don't think I can figure it out. Even after I figured out all the correct make commands (make linux-dri and whatever), copied around a

Re: [r300] building on ppc?

2005-03-29 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 17:23, Johannes Berg wrote: On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 13:49 +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote: Same as for PC (so see readme in r300 for detailed steps) but you must use lastest Xorg CVS (head). I don't think I can figure it out. Even after I figured out all the correct

Re: [r300] building on ppc?

2005-03-29 Thread Johannes Berg
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 17:27 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: The server doesn't load the DRI driver. Why are you asking it to? Umm. good question. Probably because I don't know what I actually have to ask it to load. johannes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [r300] building on ppc?

2005-03-29 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 17:34, Johannes Berg wrote: On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 17:27 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: The server doesn't load the DRI driver. Why are you asking it to? Umm. good question. Probably because I don't know what I actually have to ask it to load. In this order: As root,

Re: [r300] building on ppc?

2005-03-29 Thread Johannes Berg
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 17:51 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: As root, load the agpgart kernel modules corresponding to your motherboard chipset, ie, agpgart and chipset-agp. check. agpgart and uninorth-agp already loaded. As root, load the drm and r300 kernel modules. check. already loaded those

Re: [r300] building on ppc?

2005-03-29 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 17:57, Johannes Berg wrote: On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 17:51 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: Start X. no go: dlopen: /opt/Xorg-cvs/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so: undefined symbol: __glXLastContext (EE) Failed to load /opt/Xorg-cvs/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so

Re: [r300] building on ppc?

2005-03-29 Thread Johannes Berg
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 18:03 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: Yes. Attaching your config file and startup log would help. done. I think I probably just made a mistake while building though. johannes Xorg.1.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data xorg.conf.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed

Re: [r300] building on ppc?

2005-03-29 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 18:13, Johannes Berg wrote: On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 18:03 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: Yes. Attaching your config file and startup log would help. done. I think I probably just made a mistake while building though. (II) Loading /opt/Xorg-cvs/lib/modules/radeon_drv.o

Re: [r300] building on ppc?

2005-03-29 Thread Johannes Berg
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 18:38 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: That file name should end in .so, not .o. Find all the .o and .a files under /opt/Xorg-cvs and move them aside. Ouch, ok. All gone, but where do I get radeon_drv.so then? johannes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [r300] building on ppc?

2005-03-29 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 18:47, Johannes Berg wrote: On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 18:38 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: That file name should end in .so, not .o. Find all the .o and .a files under /opt/Xorg-cvs and move them aside. Ouch, ok. All gone, but where do I get radeon_drv.so then? It should

[Bug 2852] Bug when I enable DRI, xfree86 take 100% CPU

2005-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2852 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-29 17:44 --- Try

[Bug 2852] Bug when I enable DRI, xfree86 take 100% CPU

2005-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2852 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: [r300] building on ppc?

2005-03-29 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
Just to add a comment: I always had good success with using using X -configure configuration files. If things break, try X -configure configuration file first and, if it works, copy custom sections into it from other configuration files (I usually have to add mouse configuration, DefaultDepth

add new ati radeon card ids

2005-03-29 Thread Frank
ATI Radeon X800 (R430) (PCIE) :05:00.0 Class 0300: 1002:554f :05:00.1 Class 0380: 1002:556f -- second device 73 de Frank --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from

Re: [r300] what about *BSD?

2005-03-29 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:20:01 -0500, Jung-uk Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 28 March 2005 03:22 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Saturday 26 March 2005 07:03 am, Jerome Glisse wrote: Wait, I have one thing that's not from CVS. I patched system compiler from GCC 3.4.2 to GCC 3.4.4