Re: Fixing R300

2005-08-05 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
One change is that the remap table is now initialized to be full of -1 values. In addtion, all of the *_by_offset marcos misbehave in an obvious way if the specified offset is -1. SET_by_offset will do nothing, GET_by_offset will return NULL, and CALL_by_offset, since it uses GET_by_offs

Re: R300 memory leak

2005-08-05 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
Also, the code path pointed by Valgrind does not appear to cause this, at least not in the obvious way - putting printf("Hello\n") in r300NewProgram does not print many "Hello"'s so this is not the actual culprit.. Does anyone have suggestions ? 'key' is never freed when existing key is found

Re: Fixing R300

2005-08-05 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
I'm guessing that card_extensions in r300_context.c is wrong. There are a few extensions listed there that have NULL for their functions field. For example, the entry for GL_ARB_vertex_program should clearly be GL_ARB_vertex_program_functions instead of NULL. If there's an _functions structure

Update on R200/Squeak/croquet crash

2005-08-05 Thread Alan Grimes
I changed bit depths from 16-bit to 32-bit and the crash disappeared... This made me extremely happy for all of about two seconds, During that time I ordered the thing to go fullscreen and it gave me this error: I don't know exactly where these errors are coming from (UNIX IS EVIL) but here they

Re: Fixing R300

2005-08-05 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > > >> One change is that the remap table is now initialized to be full of -1 >> values. In addtion, all of the *_by_offset marcos misbehave in an >> obvious >> way if the specified offset is -1. SET_by_offset will do n

[Bug 1746] Freelist issues in MGA DRM

2005-08-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1746 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

Fixing R300

2005-08-05 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
One change is that the remap table is now initialized to be full of -1 values. In addtion, all of the *_by_offset marcos misbehave in an obvious way if the specified offset is -1. SET_by_offset will do nothing, GET_by_offset will return NULL, and CALL_by_offset, since it uses GET_by_offs

Re: r300 DRI killing X

2005-08-05 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Small update that might help... taking the setup that works, unloading the drm and radeon modules, loading the newer drm and radeon modules (the versions reported by the radeon are 1.15.0 and 1.16.0, respectively), then restarting X causes the same e

[Bug 812] Drivers don't have _glapi_DispatchTSD weak symbol

2005-08-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 3998] New: request for removing virt_to_bus from drm_bufs.c

2005-08-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998 Summary: request for removing virt_to_bus from drm_bufs.c Produc

Re: r300 DRI killing X

2005-08-05 Thread satyr_22901
Small update that might help... taking the setup that works, unloading the drm and radeon modules, loading the newer drm and radeon modules (the versions reported by the radeon are 1.15.0 and 1.16.0, respectively), then restarting X causes the same error message about a corrupted page table. My gu

CRTC scanout buffer types

2005-08-05 Thread Jon Smirl
I've included the scanout types for the R200, what other ones are supported by the various chips? For example I think the R300 can scanout in floating point. 4bpp Indexed 8bpp Indexed 16bpp aRGB 1555 16bpp RGB 565 24bpp RGB 888 32bpp aRGB 16bpp aRGB 16bpp aIndex 88 32bpp aRGB 2:10:10:10

[Bug 3956] Crash in DRI programs: "User called no-op dispatch function (an unsupported extension function?)"

2005-08-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3956 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-06 04:49 --- This

[Bug 709] segfault in _gl_copy_visual_to_context_mode mixing new DRI and old libGL

2005-08-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 3378] _glapi_add_entrypoint does not generate offset for drivers

2005-08-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3378 Bug 3378 depends on bug 3377, which changed state. Bug 3377 Summary: _glapi_add_entr

[Bug 3377] _glapi_add_entrypoint does not function properly for offset ~0

2005-08-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3377 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 3378] _glapi_add_entrypoint does not generate offset for drivers

2005-08-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3378 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 3868] DRI drivers should export all supported fbconfigs

2005-08-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3868 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-06 03:53 --- If I

[Bug 1657] GLX/DRI failure on XOrg 6.8.0/1

2005-08-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1657 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

Re: Fwd: radeon YCbCr output

2005-08-05 Thread Steven Newbury
Thanks for the quick reply. --- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/5/05, Steven Newbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > You may also want to take a look at my unfinished radeon tv-out patch: > > > > > > http://www.botchco.com/

Re: r300 driver

2005-08-05 Thread F. Heitkamp
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, F. Heitkamp wrote: Are you using recent Mesa CVS ? If yes, there are some bugs there due to recent code changes.. Yes. I was wondering though, should I use the Mesa from Xorg CVS or the CVS Mesa when experimenting with t

Re: Fwd: radeon YCbCr output

2005-08-05 Thread Steven Newbury
--- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You may also want to take a look at my unfinished radeon tv-out patch: > > http://www.botchco.com/alex/xorg/radeon_tvout.c > http://www.botchco.com/alex/xorg/radeon_tvout.h > http://www.botchco.com/alex/xorg/radeon_tvout.diff > > one of the regs (DA

Re: Fwd: radeon YCbCr output

2005-08-05 Thread Alex Deucher
On 8/5/05, Steven Newbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You may also want to take a look at my unfinished radeon tv-out patch: > > > > http://www.botchco.com/alex/xorg/radeon_tvout.c > > http://www.botchco.com/alex/xorg/radeon_tvout.h > > http://

Re: r300 driver

2005-08-05 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, F. Heitkamp wrote: On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, F. Heitkamp wrote: Are you using recent Mesa CVS ? If yes, there are some bugs there due to recent code changes.. Yes. I was wondering though, should I use the Mesa from Xorg CVS