Re: drm: Branch 'vblank-rework'

2007-06-15 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:37 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: Ok, I updated the branch with most of your suggestions. I think the ioctl still needs work (just made it a u64 for now), Yeah, that (first member 32 bit, second 64 bit) is exactly the same as radeon setparam so not 32/64 safe (64 bit

Re: drm: Branch 'vblank-rework'

2007-06-15 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Friday, June 15, 2007 4:15:57 Michel Dänzer wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:37 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: Ok, I updated the branch with most of your suggestions. I think the ioctl still needs work (just made it a u64 for now), Yeah, that (first member 32 bit, second 64 bit) is exactly

Re: drm: Branch 'vblank-rework'

2007-06-15 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 09:27 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: On Friday, June 15, 2007 4:15:57 Michel Dänzer wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:37 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: Ok, I updated the branch with most of your suggestions. I think the ioctl still needs work (just made it a u64 for now),

[PATCH] vblank rework for radeon

2007-06-15 Thread Jesse Barnes
For reference, here's a patch converting radeon to the new vblank infrastructure. The basics are pretty easy: - add a get_vblank_counter hook to return the current vblank event count - add enable/disable_vblank hooks to enable/disable the vblank interrupt - init the vblank core

Re: Merging DRI changes

2007-06-15 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On 6/14/07, Keith Whitwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kristian Høgsberg wrote: Hi, I've finished the changes to the DRI interface that I've been talking about for a while (see #5714). Ian had a look at the DRI driver side of things, and ACK'ed those changes. I've done the X server changes