Re: GEM discussion questions

2008-05-21 Thread Thomas Hellström
Ian Romanick wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Thomas Hellström wrote: > | Ian Romanick wrote: > |> Jerome Glisse wrote: > |> | On Mon, 19 May 2008 12:04:16 -0700 > |> | Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > |> | > |> |> The GLX spec says, basically, that the results

[Bug 14966] [i915 mesa_7.0.3-rc2] segment fault with BASE_LEVEL set to 5 for MipMap

2008-05-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14966 --- Comment #5 from Colin.Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-21 20:13:14 PST --- this case can run fine on 915 (with mesa 7_0_branch) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 14222] [i965 64bit] TORCS run abort on mesa 7.0.3 rc1

2008-05-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14222 --- Comment #7 from Colin.Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-21 18:45:23 PST --- this bug can't be produced on 7_0_branch -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: -

[Bug 14221] [i965 64bit] ut2004 run abort on mesa 7.0.3 rc1

2008-05-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14221 --- Comment #6 from Colin.Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-21 18:33:37 PST --- this bug can be reproduced on latest mesa 7_0_branch -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mai

Re: GEM discussion questions

2008-05-21 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Hellström wrote: | Ian Romanick wrote: |> Jerome Glisse wrote: |> | On Mon, 19 May 2008 12:04:16 -0700 |> | Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> | |> |> The GLX spec says, basically, that the results of changes to a shared |> |> object in

[Bug 15376] X aborts on running glxinfo

2008-05-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15376 Raúl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comme

Re: TTM vs GEM discussion questions

2008-05-21 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Anholt wrote: | We haven't touched the texsubimage path, having not found it in a | profile yet. It'll probably be doing map/write/unmap, which (as noted | elsewhere in the thread) is pretty much the worst thing you can do. If | you have a rele

Re: GEM discussion questions

2008-05-21 Thread Thomas Hellström
Ian Romanick wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jerome Glisse wrote: > | On Mon, 19 May 2008 12:04:16 -0700 > | Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > |> The GLX spec says, basically, that the results of changes to a shared > |> object in context A are guaranteed to

Re: GEM discussion questions

2008-05-21 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jerome Glisse wrote: | On Mon, 19 May 2008 12:04:16 -0700 | Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | |> The GLX spec says, basically, that the results of changes to a shared |> object in context A are guaranteed to be visible to context B when |> cont

Re: TTM vs GEM discussion questions

2008-05-21 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 17:55 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote: > Stephane Marchesin wrote: > > On 5/16/08, Pekka Paalanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 16 May 2008 10:05:18 +0200 > >> Jerome Glisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > My current understanding is that on newer GPU e

Re: GEM discussion questions

2008-05-21 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Mon, 19 May 2008 12:04:16 -0700 Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The GLX spec says, basically, that the results of changes to a shared > object in context A are guaranteed to be visible to context B when > context B binds the object. It leaves a lot of slack for changes to > show u