Keith Whitwell wrote:
>> Major bumps once stuff went into the kernel weren't allowed at all.
>> You'd need to fork the driver in any case. So we did this once or
>> twice on drivers in devel trees like mach64.
>> However upstream first policy should avoid this need. I'd also prefer
>> to see getpar
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Keith Whitwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Major bumps once stuff went into the kernel weren't allowed at all.
>> You'd need to fork the driver in any case. So we did this once or
>> twice on drivers in devel trees like mach64.
>> However upstream first policy sho
Hi guys,
since I do not quite know who is the culprit for that problem, I want to
ask here first before filing a bug report. Maybe one of you has got an
idea how to deal with that.
The problem is as follows:
Using kernel 2.6.27-rc* with the GEM extensions from Eric's
drm-gem-merge branch as of
> Major bumps once stuff went into the kernel weren't allowed at all.
> You'd need to fork the driver in any case. So we did this once or
> twice on drivers in devel trees like mach64.
> However upstream first policy should avoid this need. I'd also prefer
> to see getparam for new features instead
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Thomas Hellström
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Thomas Hellström
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dave,
>>>
>>> This process looks ok to me,
>>> but I think some clarifications are needed:
>>>
>>> Dave
Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Thomas Hellström
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Dave,
>>
>> This process looks ok to me,
>> but I think some clarifications are needed:
>>
>> Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>>> Okay I've put some thoughts up at:
>>> http://dri.freedesktop.org/
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Thomas Hellström
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave,
>
> This process looks ok to me,
> but I think some clarifications are needed:
>
> Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> Okay I've put some thoughts up at:
>> http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/DRMProcess
>>
>> and I've pasted it
Dave,
This process looks ok to me,
but I think some clarifications are needed:
Dave Airlie wrote:
> Okay I've put some thoughts up at:
> http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/DRMProcess
>
> and I've pasted it in below this for discussion.
>
> some other points:
>
> a) People are pushing for a process c
